SavedAdd your journal

Journals / F L S F / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Felsefe Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 8

Two approaches to history in the context of contingency and necessity: Richard Rorty ve G.W.F. Hegel

Olumsallık ve zorunluluk kavramları bağlamında felsefe tarihine iki yaklaşım: Richard Rorty ve G.W.F. Hegel

Ömer Faik ANLI
Pages
71–91
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to compare the Rorty’s pragmatic approach which regards history of philosophy as a fiction relative to the language-game that it takes place in with Hegel’s approach to the history of philosophy in the context of concepts like purpose, actuality and necessity in The Phenomenology’s Preface.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to compare the Rorty’s pragmatic approach which regards history of philosophy as a fiction relative to the language-game that it takes place in with Hegel’s approach to the history of philosophy in the context of concepts like purpose, actuality and necessity in The Phenomenology’s Preface.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to compare the Rorty’s pragmatic approach which regards history of philosophy as a fiction relative to the language-game that it takes place in with Hegel’s approach to the history of philosophy in the context of concepts like purpose, actuality and necessity in The Phenomenology’s Preface.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study aims to compare the Rorty’s pragmatic approach which regards history of philosophy as a fiction relative to the language-game that it takes place in with Hegel’s approach to the history of philosophy in the context of concepts like purpose, actuality and necessity in The Phenomenology’s Preface.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to compare the Rorty’s pragmatic approach which regards history of philosophy as a fiction relative to the language-game that it takes place in with Hegel’s approach to the history of philosophy in the context of concepts like purpose, actuality and necessity in The Phenomenology’s Preface.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Richard Rorty’nin felsefe tarihini içerisinde bulunulan dil oyununa göreli bir kurgu olarak gören pragmatik anlayışı, Hegel’in özellikle Görüngübilim’in Önsöz’ünde erek, edimselleşme, zorunluluk kavramları bağlamında ele aldığı felsefe tarihi anlayışı ile karşılaştırılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ANLI, Ö. F. (2022). Two approaches to history in the context of contingency and necessity: Richard Rorty ve G.W.F. Hegel. F L S F / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Felsefe Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 8, 71–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/517545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. HEGEL, G.W.F., Lectures On The History of Philosophy V1, translated by E. S. Haldane – F. H. Simson, Humanites Press, New York, 1974.
  2. HEGEL, G. W. F., Tarihte Akıl, çev. Önay Sözer, Kabalcı Yay., İstanbul, 2003.
  3. HEGEL, G. W. F., Tinin Görüngübilimi, çev. Aziz Yardımlı, İdea Yay, İstanbul, 2004.
  4. HEGEL, G. W. F., Mantık Bilimi, çev. Aziz Yardımlı, İdea Yay. İstanbul, 2004.
  5. RORTY, Richard, The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method, The University of Chicago Pres, 1992.
  6. RORTY, Richard, Olumsallık, İroni ve Dayanışma, çev. Mehmet Küçük – Alev Türker, Ayrıntı Yay., İstanbul, 1995.
  7. RORTY, Richard, Felsefe ve Doğanın Aynası, çev. Funda Günsoy Kaya, Paradigma Yay., İstanbul, 2006.
  8. KAYA, Funda Günsoy, “Richard Rorty’ye Giriş”, Felsefe ve Doğanın Aynası, Paradigma Yay., İstanbul, 2006.
  9. WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig, Felsefi Soruşturmalar, çev. Deniz Kanıt, Küyerel Yayınları, İstanbul, 1998.