Journals / F L S F / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Felsefe Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16

Genç Marx, Yabancılaşma ve Komünizm, ve Aristoteles üzerine bir not

Young Marx, alienation and communism, and a note on Aristotle

Pages
95–120
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both thinkers recognize man’s communal nature but intrepret it in entirely different ways.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, I explore young Marx’s theses on man, alienation and communism from a critical point of view.
📊
Key Findings & Data:I argue that Marx’s thought fits well within the tradition of modern subject metaphysics which culminates in Hegel’s philosophy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both thinkers recognize man’s communal nature but intrepret it in entirely different ways.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this article, I explore young Marx’s theses on man, alienation and communism from a critical point of view. I argue that Marx’s thought fits well within the tradition of modern subject metaphysics which culminates in Hegel’s philosophy. Marx’s attempt at interpreting human essence in terms of labor and production belong directly to this context of subject metaphysics. I also take issue with the social-political implications of this undestanding of man. Then I have recourse to Aristotle’s political thought, his reflections on polis, as a comparative case. Both thinkers recognize man’s communal nature but intrepret it in entirely different ways.

Özet

Bu makalede genç Marx’ın insan, yabancılaşma ve komünizm üzerine tezlerini eleştirel bir şekilde ele alıyorum. Marx’ın düşüncesinin Hegel felsefesinde zirveye varan modern özne metafiziği geleneğine çok iyi oturduğunu savunuyorum. Marx’ın insanın özünü emek ve üretim çerçevesinde yorumlama girişimi doğrudan bu özne metafiziğinin bağlamına aittir. Ayrıca bu insan anlayışının toplumsal-politik imalarını da tartışıyorum. Sonrasında bir mukayese fırsatı olarak Aristoteles’in siyaset düşüncesine, polis hakkındaki fikirlerine yöneliyorum. Her iki düşünür de insanın asli toplumsal/komünal doğasını kabul etmekte, ancak bunu oldukça farklı biçimlerde yorumlamaktadırlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, M. (2022). Genç Marx, Yabancılaşma ve Komünizm, ve Aristoteles üzerine bir not. F L S F / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Felsefe Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16, 95–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/517497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ARİSTOTLE. Metaphysics, ed. D. Ross, 2 vol. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975). --- Metaphysics, trans. Hugh Lawson-Tancred (London: Penguin Books, 1998) --- Nichmachean Ethics, trans. D. Ross (rev. by L. Brown) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009). --- Politics, trans. H. Rakham (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1959). --- De Anima, trans. R. D. Hicks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1907)
  2. BRUDNEY, Daniel. Marx’s Attempt to Leave Philosophy (Massachusetts: Harvard Univ. Press, 1998)
  3. COHEN, Gerald A. History, Labour, and Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).
  4. GOULD, Carol C. Marx’s Social Ontology (Masschsetts: MIT Press, 1978).
  5. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. J. Shapiro (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971).
  6. HEİDEGGER, Martin. Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985) --- Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, trans. W. McNeill and N. WALKER (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995). --- What is Called Thinking? trans. F. D. Wieck and G. Gray (New York: Harper & Row, 1968). --- “The Question Concerning Technology” in Basic Writings, ed. D. F. Krell (New York: Harper Perrenial, 2008).
  7. KAİN, Philip J. “Aristotle, Kant and the Ethics of Young Marx”, in MA. LEOPOLD, David. The Young Karl Marx (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
  8. MARGOLİS, J. “Praxis and Meaning: Marx’s Species Being and Aristotle’s Political Animal”, in MA. MARX, K. Early Writings, trans. R. Livingstone and G. Benton, ed. L. Colletti (London: Penguin, 1975). --- The German Ideology, ed. C. J. Arthur (London: International Pubishers, 1970) --- Grundrisse, trans. Martin Nicolaus (London: Penguin Books, 1973) --- Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, trans. A. Jolin and J. O’Malley (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).
  9. MILLER, F. "Aristotle's Political Theory", The Stanford Enc. of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Ed.), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = _____http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/aristotle-politics/>.
  10. MCCARTHY, George E. (ed.) Marx and Aristotle: Nineteenth Century German Social Theory and Classical Antiquity (Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1992).
  11. Abbr. as MA. ROCKMORE, Tom. Fichte, Marx and the German Philosophical Tradition (Carbodale, III.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1980). --- “Marxian Subjectivity, Idealism and Greek Philosophy” in MA. --- Marx After Marxism (Oxford: Blackwell Pub., 2002).
  12. ROSEN, Stanley. “Karl Marx”, Rout