Journals / Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Gynecologic pain: Diagnosis and treatment of current approaches, evidence-based applications

Jinekolojik ağrı: Tanı ve tedavide güncel yaklaşımlar, kanıt temelli uygulamalar

Pages
198–204
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, addressing the phenomenon of pain and its treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach, and this team is an indispensable member of the nurses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gynaecological pain, occurs more frequently in women of reproductive age in each age group with a common and important health problem which can be seen.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Whatever the cause of the pain adversely affecting the quality of life of women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, addressing the phenomenon of pain and its treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach, and this team is an indispensable member of the nurses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Gynaecological pain, occurs more frequently in women of reproductive age in each age group with a common and important health problem which can be seen. Whatever the cause of the pain adversely affecting the quality of life of women. This is a difficult situation in pain management by clinicians, as the process of diagnosis and treatment of a majority of women suffer because of this situation. Well understood due to pathophysiology of gynecological pain semptoms relaxing treatments are insufficient and often. Proven effective interventions is limited to gynecological pain. Therefore, addressing the phenomenon of pain and its treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach, and this team is an indispensable member of the nurses.

Özet

inekolojik ağrı, üreme çağındaki kadınlarda daha sık görülmekle birlikte her yaş grubunda da görülebilen yaygın ve önemli bir sağlık sorunudur. Ağrı nedeni ne olursa olsun kadınların yaşam kalitesini olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Bu ağrı klinisyenler tarafından yönetimi zor bir durum olup, tanı ve tedavi sürecine kadar kadınların bir çoğu bu durumdan dolayı acı çekmekte- dir. Jinekolojik ağrının patofizyolojisi iyi anlaşılamamış olmasından dolayı uygulanan tedaviler yetersiz kalmakta ve genellikle semptomları rahatlatmaya yönelik olmaktadır. Jinekolojik ağrıda kanıtlanmış etkili müdahaleler sınırlıdır. Bundan dolayı ağrı olgusunun ele alınması ve tedavisi multidisipliner bir yaklaşımını gerektirir ve bu ekibin vazgeçilmez üyesi ise hemşirelerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAL, H. E., KIZILKAYA, N. B. (2022). Gynecologic pain: Diagnosis and treatment of current approaches, evidence-based applications. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 198–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/517290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (2004). Chronic pelvic pain obstetrics & gynecology. Practice Bulletin, 103(3): 589-605.
  2. Atasü, T., Şahmay, S. (2001).
  3. Jinekolojide semptomlar. Atasü, T., Şamay S. (Ed.). Jinekoloji. 2. basım, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, İstanbul, 103-104.
  4. Candiani, G. B., Fedele, L., Vercellini, P., Bianchi, S., Di Nola G. (1992). Presacral neuroctomy for the treatment of pelvic pain asso- ciated with endometriosis: A controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 167: 100-103.
  5. Chen, F. P., Chang, S. D., Chu, K. K., Soong, Y. K. (1996). Comparison of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy and laparoscopic uterin nerve ablation for primary dysmenorrhea. J Reprod Med., 41: 463-466.
  6. Cheong, Y., Stones, R.W. (2006). Chronic pelvic pain: Aetiology and therapy. Best Practice&Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 20: 695-711.
  7. Cheong, Y., Stones, W. (2005). Investigations for chronic pelvic pain. Reviews in Gynaecological Practice, 5: 227-236.
  8. Cody, R. F., Ascher, S. M. (2000). Diagnostic value of radiological tests in chronic pelvic pain. Bailliere’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 14(3): 433-466.
  9. Cooperberg, M. R., Stoller, M. L. (2005). Percutaneous neuromodulation. Urol Clin N Am., 32: 71-78.
  10. Coşkun, A. ve ark. (2008). Hemşire ve ebelere yönelik kadın sağlığı ve hastalıkları öğrenim rehberi. Coşkun, A. (Ed.). İstanbul Medikal Yayıncılık Ltd. Şti., İstanbul, 167-225.
  11. Elcombe, S., Gath, D., Day, A. (1997). The psychological effects of laparoscopy on women with chronic pelvic pain. Psychol Med., 27: 1041-1050.
  12. El-Din Shawki, H. (2011). The efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation (LUNA) in the treatment of unexplained chronic pelvic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Surg., 8: 31-39.
  13. Fall, M. ve ark. (2008). Guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. European Association of Urology, 85-98, http://www.uroweb.org/file- admin/user_upload/Guidelines/Chronic%20Pelvic%20Pain.pdf (10.08.2013).
  14. Gelbaya, T. A, El-Halwagy, H. E. (2001). Focus on primary care: Chronic pelvic pain in women. Obstet Gynecol Surv., 56(12): 757-764.
  15. Gökyıldız Bayrak, Ş. (2008). Kronik pelvik ağrı şikayeti olan hastalarda tibial sinir uyarısı tedavisinin (nöromodülasyon) yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  16. Gökyıldız, Ş., Kızılkaya Beji, N. (2012). Chronic pelvic pain: Gynaecological and non-gynaecological causes and considerations for nursing care. Int J of Urol Nurs., 6: 3