Journals / Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Upper Extremity Electrical Stimulation in Addition to Conventional Rehabilitation in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: Randomized Controlled Study

Kronik İnmelilerde Konvansiyonel Rehabilitasyona Ek Olarak Uygulanan Üst Ekstremite Elektrik Stimülasyonunun Etkileri: Randomize Kontrollu Calışma

Pages
126–133
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: When the pre- and post- treatment variances of values were compared between thetreatment and control groups, the variance of wrist extension angle (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the effect of electrical stimulation of wrist and finger extensor musclesapplied in addition to the conventional rehabilitation program on wrist spasticity, hand motor function,and quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Patients were randomized intotwo groups as control (n=20) and treatment groups (n=20).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: When the pre- and post- treatment variances of values were compared between thetreatment and control groups, the variance of wrist extension angle (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of electrical stimulation of wrist and finger extensor musclesapplied in addition to the conventional rehabilitation program on wrist spasticity, hand motor function,and quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke. Material and Methods: Patients were randomized intotwo groups as control (n=20) and treatment groups (n=20). Patients in the treatment group received surfaceneuromuscular electrical stimulation to the wrist and finger extensors of the hemiplegic upper extremity for30 minutes, 5 days a week for 3 weeks in addition to conventional rehabilitation. The control group receivedonly the conventional rehabilitation program. All subjects were evaluated before and after treatment. Thehemiplegic upper extremity hand motor functions and spasticity were evaluated using Brunnstrom’s MotorStage Recovery, Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale(FMAS), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) respectively. The DuruözHand Index, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Nottinhgam Health Profile (NHP) werealso applied. Results: When the pre- and post- treatment variances of values were compared between thetreatment and control groups, the variance of wrist extension angle (p

Özet

Amaç: Kronik inmeli hastalarda konvansiyonel rehabilitasyona ek olarak; el bileği ve parmak ekstensörlerine uygulanan elektrik stimülasyonunun, el bileğinde spastisite, el motor fonksiyonu, yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Hastalar tedavi (n=20) ve kontrol (n=20) grubu olmak üzere iki gruba randomize edildi. Tedavi grubundaki hastalar hemiplejik üst ekstremiteye yönelik konvansiyonel rehabilitasyon programına ek olarak; üç hafta, haftada beş gün, günde 30 dk yüzeyel nöromusküler elektrik stimülasyonu tedavisi aldı. Kontrol grubu yalnız konvansiyonel rehabilitasyon programına alındı. Tüm hastalar tedavi öncesi ve sonrası değerlendirildi. Hemiplejik üst ekstremite motor fonksiyonları ve spastisitesi sırasıyla Brunnstrom Motor Evrelemesi, Fugl Meyer Değerlendirme Skalası (FMDS) ve Modiye Ashworth Skalası (MAS), ile değerlendirildi. Aynı zamanda Duruöz El indeksi, Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçeği (FBÖ) ve Nottinhgam Sağlık Profili (NSP) uygulandı. Bulgular: Tedavi ve kontrol gruplarında tedavi öncesi ve sonrası değerlerin farkları karşılaştırıldığında; el bilek ekstansiyonu açısı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TİLKİCİ, M., MANDIROĞLU, S., GÖKKAYA, N. K. O., UÇAN, H., AYKAN, S. A., ALEMDAROĞLU, E. (2022). The Effect of Upper Extremity Electrical Stimulation in Addition to Conventional Rehabilitation in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: Randomized Controlled Study. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 126–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/516810

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Wolfe CD, Tilling K, Rudd A, Giroud M, Inzitari D. Variations in care and outcome in the first year after stroke: a Western and Central European perspective. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(12):1702-6. Yıldız N, Ordu Gökkaya NK, Köseoğlu BF. Upper extremity problems in stroke patients. Fiziksel Tıp 2003;6(1):39-45. Yavuzer G, Sonel B, Tuncer S, Süldür N. The evaluation of upper extremity and hand functions in patients with stroke. Turkish Phys Med Rehab 2001;47(3):38-43. Dalyan Aras M, Çakcı A. İnme rehabilitasyonu. Oğuz H, Dursun E, Dursun N, editörler. Tıbbi Rehabilitasyon
  2. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2004. p.590-4. Brewer L, Horgan F, Hickey A, Williams D. Stroke rehabilitation: recent advances and future therapies. QJM 2013;106(1):11-25. Poulin de Courval L, Barsauskas A, Berenbaum B, Dehaut F, Dussault R, Fontaine FS, et al. Painful shoulder in the hemiplegic and unilateral neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71(9):673-6. Sahin N, Ugurlu H, Albayrak I. The efficacy of electrical stimulation in reducing the poststroke spasticity: a randomized controlled study. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34(2):151-6. Malhotra S, Rosewilliam S, Hermens H, Roffe C, Jones P, Pandyan AD. A randomized controlled trial of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation applied early after acute stroke: effects on wrist pain, spasticity and contractures. Clin Rehabil 2013;27(7):579-90. Yan T, Hui-Chan CW, Li LS. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke 2005;36(1):80- 5. Chae J, Bethoux F, Bohine T, Dobos L, Davis T, Friedl A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke 1998; 29(5):975-9. Bazin S, Kitchen S. Electrotherapy: EvidenceBased Practice. 11th ed. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. Kaymak Karataş G. İnme. Beyazova M, Gökçe Kutsal Y, editörler. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2011. p.2761-88. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient
  3. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7(1): 13-31. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;67(2):206-7. Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil