Journals / Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Single Center Experience in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomide Tek Merkez Deneyimi

Pages
135–138
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Gastrostomy, percutaneous end

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Gastrostomies are used to provide long-term enteral treatment in patients with inadequate oral intake.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Today, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEG) are preferred more because of the low complication rates compared to surgical and radiological gastrostomies and can be performed more easily at the bedside.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Gastrostomy, percutaneous end
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Gastrostomies are used to provide long-term enteral treatment in patients with inadequate oral intake. Today, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEG) are preferred more because of the low complication rates compared to surgical and radiological gastrostomies and can be performed more easily at the bedside. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate patients undergoing PEG. Materials and Methods: Between January 2014 and January 2019, 325 patients who underwent PEG at the Istanbul Medipol University Medical Faculty Hospital Intensive Care Unit were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic and clinical features of these patients and postprocedure results were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.8±18.1 years. 200 (61.5%) of these patients were male. The most common indications for PEG implantation were cerebrovascular diseases (SVD) (27.7%). The most common complication in patients was leakage from the side of the tube (4.6%). PEG associated mortality did not develop in these patients. PEG tube was removed in 25 (7.6%) patients whose oral feeding improved. Conclusion: PEG procedure seems appropriate for the maintenance of enteral treatments, especially in critically ill patients with poor oral intake, due to its easy application at the bedside, the low complication and mortality rates. Keywords: Gastrostomy, percutaneous end

Özet

Amaç: Gastrostomiler oral alım yetersizliği olan hastalarda uzun süreli enteral tedaviyi sağlamakiçin kullanılmaktadır. Günümüzde cerrahi ve radyolojik gastrostomilere göre komplikasyonoranlarındaki düşüklük ve hasta başında daha kolay yapılabilmesi nedeniyle perkütan endoskopikgastrostomiler (PEG) daha çok tercih edilmektedir. Bu retrospektif çalışmanın amacı, PEG yapılanhastaların değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2014 - Ocak 2019 tarihleri arasında İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi TıpFakültesi Hastanesi Yoğun Bakım Ünitesi'nde, PEG yapılan 325 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi.Bu hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ile işlem sonrası sonuçları değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 63.8±18.1 yıldı. Bu hastaların 200'ü (%61.5) erkekti.Hastalarda en sık PEG takılma endikasyonu serebrovasküler hastalıktı (SVH) (%27.7). Hastalardaen sık görülen komplikasyon tüp kenarından sızıntıydı (%4.6). Bu hastalarda PEG ile ilişkilimortalite gelişmedi. Oral beslenmesi düzelen 25 (%7.6) hastada PEG tüpü çekildi.Sonuç: Hasta başında kolaylıkla uygulanabilmesi, komplikasyon ve mortalite oranlarının sonderece düşük olması nedeniyle özellikle oral alımın yetersiz olduğu kritik hastalarda, enteraltedavilerin sürdürülebilmesi için PEG işlemi uygun görünmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTUĞRUL, G., KIZILASLAN, D., HIZARCI, B. (2022). Single Center Experience in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 135–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/514443

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Conroy T. The Prevention and management of complications associated with established percutaneous gastrostomy tubes in adults: A systematic review. JBI Lib Sys Rev 2009; 7: 1-37
  2. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: A percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15: 872-875
  3. McClave SA, Ritchie CS. The role of endoscopically placed feeding or decompression tubes. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2006; 35: 83-100
  4. Disario J. Endoscopic approaches to enteral nutritional support. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 20: 605- 630
  5. Bechtold ML, Matteson ML, Choudhary A,et al. Early versus delayed feeding after placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2919-2924
  6. Blomberg J, Lagergren J, Martin L, Mattsson F, Lagergren P. Complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 737-742
  7. Rimon E, Kagansky N, Levy S. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; evidence of different prognosis in various patient subgroups. Age Ageing 2005; 34: 353-357
  8. Russell TR, Brotman M, Norris F. Percutaneous gastrostomy. A new simplified and cost-effective technique. Am J Surg 1984; 148: 132-137
  9. Gauderer MW, Olsen MM, Stellato TA, Dokler ML. Feeding gastrostomy button: Experience and recommendations. J Pediatr Surg 1988; 23: 24-28
  10. Hutchinson E, Wilson N. Acute stroke, dysphagia and nutritional support. Br J Community Nurs 2013; Suppl: 26- 29
  11. Corrigan ML, Escuro AA, Celestin J, Kirby DF. Nutrition in the stroke patient. Nutr Clin Pract 2011; 26: 242-252
  12. Geeganage C, Beavan J, Ellender S, Bath PM. Interventions for dysphagia and nutritional support in acute and subacute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD000323 13. Czell D, Bauer M, Binek J, Schoch OD, Weber M. Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion in respiratory impaired amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients under noninvasive ventilation. Respir Care 2013; 58: 838-844
  13. Hanson LC, Carey TS, Caprio AJ, et al. Improving decision-making for feeding options in advanced dementia: A randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59: 2009-2016
  14. Pulkkinen J, Rekola J, Asanti M, Grénman R. Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: Results of tertiary institute. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 271: 1755-1758
  15. Nevah MI, Lamberth JR, Dekovich AA. Transnasal P