Journals / Teknik Dergi / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

A Method For Determination of Accident Probability in Construction Industry

Pages
8537–8561
Publication Date
2018-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thanks to the approach presented in this paper it was possible to provide an objective method to obtain accident probabilities using the Poisson distribution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Safety issues for construction industry have been considered in almost every country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, an objective and quantitative accident probability calculation approach is proposed using actual construction work accidents in between 2000-2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thanks to the approach presented in this paper it was possible to provide an objective method to obtain accident probabilities using the Poisson distribution.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aktivite tabanlı kaza sıklığı · maruziyet · adam-saat değerleri

Abstract

Safety issues for construction industry have been considered in almost every country. In this paper, an objective and quantitative accident probability calculation approach is proposed using actual construction work accidents in between 2000-2013. Probabilities were calculated by using Poisson distribution where accident rates and exposure values were used as distribution parameters. In an industry where the accidents are recorded in non-specific standards, it is very difficult to represent probability of accidents with a known distribution model. Thanks to the approach presented in this paper it was possible to provide an objective method to obtain accident probabilities using the Poisson distribution.

Özet

İnşaat Sektöründe Kaza Olasılıklarının Belirlenmesi İçin Bir Yöntemİnşaat sektöründe iş güvenliği bir çok ülkede önem verilen bir konudur. Bu makalede inşaat sektöründe nesnel ve hesaplanabilir yeni bir kaza olasılığı yaklaşımı sunulmaktadır. Bu kaza olasılığı hesaplaması için 2000-2013 yılları arasında ülkemizde gerçekleşen gerçek inşaat kazaları ve istanbul çevresinde bulunan 20 inşaat projesinin planlama tabloları kullanılmıştır. Olasılıklar, Poisson dağılımı ile kaza sıklıkları ve maruziyet değerlerinden faydalanılarak hesaplanmıştır. İnşaat sektörü gibi kazaların random gerçekleştiği sektörlerde iş kazalarını herhangi bir olasılık dağılımı ile temsil edilmesi oldukça güçtür. Ancak bu yaklaşım sayesinde kaza olasılıkları projeye başlanmadan evvel rahatlıkla belirlenebilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLİR, S., GÜRCANLI, G. E. (2018). A Method For Determination of Accident Probability in Construction Industry. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 8537–8561. https://ajindex.com/articles/51273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Zou, P., X.,W., Sunindijo, R., Y., 2013. Skills for managing safety risk, implementing safety task, and developing positive safety climate in construction project. Automation in Construction, 34, 92-100
  2. CFOI. Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Report, 2013. (retrieved 12.05.14)
  3. Loosemore, M., Andonakis, N., 2007. Barriers to implementing OHS reforms – the experience of small subcontractors in the Australian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management 25, 579–588
  4. Yi, J.-s., Kim Y.-w., Kim K.-a., Koo B. 2012. A suggested color scheme for reducing perception-related accidents on construction work sites. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 185-192
  5. ILO. International Labour Organization, Statistics and Database, LABORSTA, Occupational Injuries. (retrieved 06.04.2014
  6. SII. Social Insurance Institution Occupational Accidents Statistics Report, 2012. 10.12.2013. Retrieved from http://www.isteguvenlik.tc/SGK2012IsKazaIstatistik.pdf (in Turkish)
  7. Gurcanli E., Bilir S., Sevim M., 2015. Activity Based Risk Assessment And Safety Cost Estimation For Residential Building Construction Projects. Safety Science, 2015, 80, 1–12, DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.002
  8. Gurcanli G.E., Mungen U., 2013. Analysis of construction accidents in turkey and responsible parties. National Industrial Health, 51 (6), 581-595
  9. Baradan, S., and Usmen, M. A. 2006. Comparative injury and fatality risk analysis of building trades. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(5), 533–539
  10. Gnoni, M. G., Saleh, J. H., 2017. Near-miss management systems and observability-in-depth: Handling safety incidents and accident precursors in light of safety principles. Safety Science, 91, 154-167
  11. Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N., Roca, X. and Fuertes, A. 2010. Mitigating construction safety risks using prevention through design. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 41, 107-122
  12. Gurcanli G.E., Mungen U., 2009. An occupational safety risk analysis method at construction sites using fuzzy sets. International J. of Industrial Ergonomics 39(2), 371-387
  13. Hallowell, M. 2011. Risk-Based Framework for Safety Investment in Construction Organizations. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 137(8), 592–599
  14. Irumba R., 2014. Spatial analysis of construction accidents in Kampala, Uganda. Safety Science. 64. 109-120
  15. Park, C. S., Kim, H. J., 2012. A framework for construction safety management and visualization system. Automation in Construction 33, 95–103.