✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Method: This was a single-center retrospective comparison of in-hospital and 1-year major advance cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the efficacy and bleeding risk of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim: To compare the efficacy and bleeding risk of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Method: This was a single-center retrospective comparison of in-hospital and 1-year major advance cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Aim: To compare the efficacy and bleeding risk of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method: This was a single-center retrospective comparison of in-hospital and 1-year major advance cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR
🔖
Cite This Article
Katkat, F., Sahin, I., Karahan, S., Ince, O., Okuyan, E., Degertekin, M. M. (2022). Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in chronic kidney disease patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective evaluation. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 183–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/512590