SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Teknik Dergi / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Residual Displacement Demand Evaluation from Spectral Displacement

Müberra ESER AYDEMİR
Cem AYDEMİR
Pages
8913–8935
Publication Date
2019-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on time history analyses, a new simple equation is proposed for residual displacement demand of a system as a function of structural period (T), ductility (µ), strain hardening ratio (α) and spectral displacement (Sd).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, residual displacement demands are investigated for SDOF systems with period range of 0.1-3.0 s for near-field and far-field ground motions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effects of stiffness degradation and post yield stiffness ratio on residual displacements are investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on time history analyses, a new simple equation is proposed for residual displacement demand of a system as a function of structural period (T), ductility (µ), strain hardening ratio (α) and spectral displacement (Sd).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Residual displacement · stiffness degradation · ductility demand

Abstract

In this study, residual displacement demands are investigated for SDOF systems with period range of 0.1-3.0 s for near-field and far-field ground motions. The effects of stiffness degradation and post yield stiffness ratio on residual displacements are investigated. The modified-Clough model is used to represent structures that exhibit significant stiffness degradation when subjected to reverse cyclic loading. An elastoplastic model is used to represent non-degrading structures. For inelastic time history analyses, Newmark’s step by step time integration method was adapted in an in-house computer program. Based on time history analyses, a new simple equation is proposed for residual displacement demand of a system as a function of structural period (T), ductility (µ), strain hardening ratio (α) and spectral displacement (Sd).

Özet

In this study, residual displacement demands are investigated for SDOF systems with period range of 0.1-3.0 s for near-field and far-field ground motions. The effects of stiffness degradation and post yield stiffness ratio on residual displacements are investigated. The modified-Clough model is used to represent structures that exhibit significant stiffness degradation when subjected to reverse cyclic loading. The elastoplastic model is used to represent non-degrading structures. For inelastic time history analyses, Newmark’s step by step time integration method was adapted in an in-house computer program. Based on time history analyses, a new simple equation is proposed for residual displacement demand of a system as a function of structural period (T), ductility (µ), strain hardening ratio (α) and spectral displacement (Sd).

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDEMİR, M. E., AYDEMİR, C. (2019). Residual Displacement Demand Evaluation from Spectral Displacement. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 8913–8935. https://ajindex.com/articles/51249

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Applied Technology Council (1996). ATC 40: The Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. 2 volumes. Redwood City, California. Applied Technology Council (2007). ATC 63: Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters - 75% Interim Draft Report, Redwood City, California. Ayoub A, Chenouda M (2009). Response spectra of degrading structural systems. Engineering Structures, 31, 1393-1402.
  2. Bates DM, Watts DG (1988). Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley: New York. Borzi B, Calvi GM, Elnashai AS, Faccioli E, Bommer JJ (2011). Inelastic spectra for displacement-based seismic design. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(1), 47–61.
  3. Christidis AA, Dimitroudi EG, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2013). Maximum seismic displacements evaluation of steel frames from their post-earthquake residual deformation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(6): 2233–2248.
  4. Clough RW, Johnston SB (1966). Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements. In: Proc of the Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, 227–232. D’Ambrisi A, Mezzi M (2015). Design value estimate of the residuals of the seismic response parameters of RC frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(5), 1491-1511.
  5. Farrow KT, Kurama YT (2003). SDOF demand index relationships for performance-based design. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4):799–838.
  6. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. ReportFEMA356:, Washington, DC. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2009), Effects of Strength and Stiffness Degradation on Seismic Response FEMA P440A, Washington, DC. Gupta A, Krawinkler H (1998). Effect of stiffness degradation on deformation demands for SDOF and MDOF structures. Proc., 6th Natl. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California. Gupta B, Kunnath SK (1998). Effect of hysteretic model parameters on inelastic seismic demands. Proc., 6th Natl. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California. Hatzigeorgiou GD, Papagiannopoulos GA, Beskos DE (2011). Evaluation of maximum seismic displacements of SDOF systems from their residual deformation. Engineering Structures, 33: 3422–3431.
  7. Liossatou E, Fardis MN (2014). Residual displacements of RC structures as SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, doi: 10.1002/eqe.2483. MacRae GA, K