Journals / European Journal of Therapeutics / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Bibliometric Analysis of Turkey’s Research Activity in the Anatomy and Morphology Category from the Web of Science Database

Pages
268–280
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that 1,461 publications (3.04%) have at least one author from Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The measurement of international publication activities is one of the essential indicators used to evaluate the scientific development level of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: According to 2019 data, journals in the Anatomy and Morphology category and indexed in the SCI-E were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that 1,461 publications (3.04%) have at least one author from Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The measurement of international publication activities is one of the essential indicators used to evaluate the scientific development level of countries. Although many studies are using the bibliometric method in the literature, it is seen that there are very few bibliometric studies in the field of anatomy. This study aimed to analyze the articles bibliometrically which conducted by researchers at institutions from Turkey and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) of the Web of Science database in the category of Anatomy and Morphology. Materials and Methods: According to 2019 data, journals in the Anatomy and Morphology category and indexed in the SCI-E were determined. Publications from Turkey that were published in these journals was determined. The full-texts of these articles were examined, and study types were defined. Also, VOSviewer software was used to create a collaboration and word co-occurrence network. Results: It was determined that there were 48,002 publications in 21 journals. It was found that 1,461 publications (3.04%) have at least one author from Turkey. The total number of citations was 11,728 for these publications. The average number of citations was 8.02 6 11.95. The radiological studies have increased statisticallymore than both experimental animal and cadaveric studies by years. In addition, it has been determined that the total number of articles, especially the radiological studies, has increased significantly over the years. Conclusion: The increase in the number of scientific studies in the field of anatomy is important in terms of the contribution of Turkey to literature in this area.

🔖

Cite This Article

GOVSA, F., ADANIR, S. S., BAHŞİ, İ., ORHAN, M., KERVANCIOĞLU, P. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Turkey’s Research Activity in the Anatomy and Morphology Category from the Web of Science Database. European Journal of Therapeutics, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 268–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/512155

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Cetkin M, Turhan B, Bahsi I, Kervancioglu P. The opinions of medicine faculty students about anatomy education. Eur J Ther. 2016;22(2):82-88. [CrossRef] 2. Persaud TVN. Early History of Human Anatomy: From Antiquity to the Beginning of the Modern Era. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher, 1984. 3. Adanir SS, Bahsi I, Orhan M. Contributions to our modern understanding of cranial nerves and brain: Friedrich Arnold (1803-1890). Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35(4):577-580. [CrossRef] 4. McMenamin PG, McLachlan J, Wilson A, et al. Do we really need cadavers anymore to learn anatomy in undergraduate medicine? Med Teach. 2018;40(10):1020-1029. [CrossRef] 5. Wing L, Massoud TF. Trends in performance indicators of neuroimaging anatomy research publications: A bibliometric study of major neuroradiology journal output over four decades based on web of science database. Clin Anat. 2015;28(1):16-26. [Cross- Ref] 6. Dhiman A. Ethnobotany journal: A ten year bibliometric study. IASLIC Bull. 2000;45(4):177-182. 7. Abdi A, Idris N, Alguliyev RM, Aliguliyev RM. Bibliometric analysis of IP&M journal. J Sci Res. 2018;7(1):54-62. [CrossRef] 8. Topal Z, Bahsi I, Tufan AE. Evaluation of the psychiatric research output fromTurkey via web of science database: A bibliometric analysis. Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020;30(4):1-33. [CrossRef] 9. Tekin AM, Bahsi _I. Global research on maxillofacial fracture over the last 40 years: A bibliometric study. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(6):e568-e572. [CrossRef] 10. Petekkaya E. The most cited articles in anatomy: An update study. Eurasian J Med Investig. 2019;4(1):6-13. 11. Adanır SS, Bahsi _I, Kervancıog˘ lu P, Orhan M, CihanO¨ F. Bibliometric analysis of articles published in anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018. Anatomy. 2020;14(1):39-43. [CrossRef] 12. Thompson DF. Bibliometric analysis of pharmacology publications in the United States: A state-level evaluation. J Sci Res. 2019;7(3):167-172. [CrossRef] 13. Web of Science Core Collection Help. [CrossRef] 14. Publication Characteristics (Publication Types) with Scope Notes. [CrossRef] 15. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523- 538. [CrossRef] 16. Altunkaynak ME, Ozbek E, Altunkaynak BZ, Can I, Unal D, Unal B. The effects of high-fat diet on the renal structure and morphometric parametric of kidneys in rats. J Anatomy. 2008;21