Journals / European Journal of Therapeutics / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Corrected QT Intervals of 74 COVID- 19 Patients Treated with Hydroxychloroquine in Combination with or without Azithromycin and/or Favipiravir

Pages
311–317
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

HCQ, AZ, and FAV should be safely used in patients with lower MEWS score and without the severe disease, in conjunction with QTc follow-up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to evaluate the degree of QTc prolongation and associated factors in patients with COVID-19 in association with their usage of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with or without the combination of azithromycin (AZ) and/or favipiravir (FAV).
📊
Key Findings & Data:We retrospectively examined the pre- and post-treatment electrocardiogram (ECG) records of 74 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:HCQ, AZ, and FAV should be safely used in patients with lower MEWS score and without the severe disease, in conjunction with QTc follow-up.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the degree of QTc prolongation and associated factors in patients with COVID-19 in association with their usage of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with or without the combination of azithromycin (AZ) and/or favipiravir (FAV). Methods: This single-center, retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care university hospital. We retrospectively examined the pre- and post-treatment electrocardiogram (ECG) records of 74 patients. Results: The median age was 44 (interquartile range [IQR] 27), and 34 (45.5%) of them were women. All these 74 patients were treated with HCQ. Sixty-three of them (83.2%) were treated with AZ, and eight patients (10.8%) also were treated with plus favipiravir. All ECGs were in sinus rhythm, and arrhythmia was not developed in any patients. The median (IQR) baseline QTc of 74 patients was 400 (375- 421) milliseconds, the median (IQR) post-treatment QTc was 418 milliseconds (391-432), and the change was statistically significant (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in QTc prolongation between treatment groups. In the linear regression model, moderate disease activity, higher Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) score ( 2), and heart rate were independent predictors. QTc prolongation of more than 60 milliseconds was observed in five patients (6.7%). Post-treatment QTc value of over 500 milliseconds was observed in three patients (4%), and the drugs were discontinued. Conclusions: This is the first study that demonstrates that MEWS score and disease severity are related to higher QTc prolongation values. HCQ, AZ, and FAV should be safely used in patients with lower MEWS score and without the severe disease, in conjunction with QTc follow-up.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNKAYA, A. Ç., ŞENER, Y. Z., GÜVEN, G. S., BAŞARAN, N. Ç., YORGUN, H., CANPOLAT, U., AYTEMİR, K., UYAROĞLU, O. A., ÖZIŞIK, L., ÖZDEDE, M., ŞAHİN, T. K. (2022). Evaluation of Corrected QT Intervals of 74 COVID- 19 Patients Treated with Hydroxychloroquine in Combination with or without Azithromycin and/or Favipiravir. European Journal of Therapeutics, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 311–317. https://ajindex.com/articles/512130

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Data last updated: 2021/02/27, 3:09 pm CET. Available at
  2. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(1):105949. [CrossRef] 3. Tang W, Cao Z, Han M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in patients with mainly mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019: Open label, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2020;369:M1849. [CrossRef] 4. Geleris J, Sun Y, Platt J, et al. Observational study of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(25):2411-2418. [CrossRef] 5. Wallace DJ, Tse K, Hanrahan L, Davies R, Petri MA. Hydroxychloroquine usage in US patients, their experiences of tolerability and adherence, and implications for treatment: Survey results from 3127 patients with SLE conducted by the Lupus Foundation of America. Lupus Sci Med. 2019;6(1):E000317. [CrossRef] 6. Taylor SP, Sellers E, Taylor BT. Azithromycin for the prevention of COPD exacerbations: The good, bad, and ugly. Am J Med. 2015;128(12):1362.e1-1362.e26. [CrossRef] 7. Joshi S, Parkar J, Ansari A, et al. Role of favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;102:501-508. [CrossRef] 8. Chorin E, Wadhwani L, Magnani S, et al. QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes in patients with COVID-19 treated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(9):1425- 1433. [CrossRef] 9. Mercuro NJ, Yen CF, Shim DJ, et al. Risk of QT interval prolongation associated with use of hydroxychloroquine with or without concomitant azithromycin among hospitalized patients testing positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(9):1036-1041. Erratum in: JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(9):1071. [CrossRef] 10. Chinello P, Petrosillo N, Pittalis S, et al. QTc interval prolongation during favipiravir therapy in an ebolavirus-infected patient. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(12):E0006034. [CrossRef] 11. WHO discontinues hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir treatment arms for COVID-19. 2020. Available at https:// www.who.int/news-room/detail/04-07-2020-who-discontinueshydroxychloroquine- and-lopinavir-ritonavir-treatment-arms-forcovid- 19
  3. Lin C. Why do Asian countries use hydroxychloroquine for Covid- 19 despite Western rejection? ISPSW strategy series: Focus on defense and international security. Available