SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Teknik Dergi / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Time - Cost Relationships for Superstructure Projects in Turkey

Murat SÖNMEZ
S.ümit DİKMEN
Rıfat AKBIYIKLI
Pages
9869–9896
Publication Date
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the effects of the parameters such as exchange rates and the number of non-working days on the time-cost relationship were investigated statistically.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of time-cost relationship in construction projects was first introduced by Bromilow.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Time and cost data of superstructure projects completed between the years of 1999-2018 was used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the effects of the parameters such as exchange rates and the number of non-working days on the time-cost relationship were investigated statistically.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Time-cost relationship · Bromilow’s BTC model · superstructure projects

Abstract

The concept of time-cost relationship in construction projects was first introduced by Bromilow. Bromilow used the data of the superstructure projects completed in Australia in the creation of the proposed time-cost model (BTC model). The aim of this study is to determine the time-cost relationship of superstructure projects in Turkey. Time and cost data of superstructure projects completed between the years of 1999-2018 was used in the study. Data was grouped primarily on the basis of the intended use of buildings (individual buildings, educational buildings, hospitals, industrial buildings and social housing), and then time-cost relationships were separately determined for each group. In addition, the effects of the parameters such as exchange rates and the number of non-working days on the time-cost relationship were investigated statistically.

Özet

The concept of time-cost relationship in construction projects was first introduced by Bromilow. Bromilow used the data of the superstructure projects completed in Australia in the creation of the proposed time-cost model (BTC model). The aim of this study is to determine the time-cost relationship of superstructure projects in Turkey. Time and cost data of superstructure projects completed between the years of 1999-2018 was used in the study. Data was grouped primarily on the basis of the intended use of buildings (individual buildings, educational buildings, hospitals, industrial buildings and social housing), and then time-cost relationships were separately determined for each group. In addition, the effects of the parameters such as exchange rates and the number of non-working days on the time-cost relationship were investigated statistically.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖNMEZ, M., DİKMEN, S., AKBIYIKLI, R. (2020). Time - Cost Relationships for Superstructure Projects in Turkey. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 9869–9896. https://ajindex.com/articles/51213

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Barrie, D. S., & Paulson, B. C., Professional construction management: including CM, design-construct, and general contracting. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math. 1992
  2. Bayram, S. Duration prediction models for construction projects: In terms of cost or physical characteristics?. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2017, 21.6: 2049-2060
  3. Bromilow, F. J., Contract Time Performance Expectations and the Reality. Building Forum, 1, 70-80, 1969
  4. Petruseva, S., Pusic, D. C., & Pancovska, V. Z. Model for Predicting Construction Time by Using General Regression Neural Network. International Scientific Conference People, Buildings and Environment 2016 (PBE2016) 29 September – 1 October, 2016, Luhacovice, Czech Republic, 2016
  5. Bayram, S. & Al-Jibouri, S. Reference Class Forecasting Method in Predicting Construction Project Duration. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 22 (3), pp.1132-1142, 2018 [6] Ariful Haque, K.M., & Hasin, M.A.A. Genetic algorithm for project time-cost optimization in fuzzy environment. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 5(2), pp.364-381, 2012
  6. Odabaşı, E., Models for Estimating Construction Duration: An Application for Selected Buildings on the METU Campus. Ankara: Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2009
  7. Love, P. E. D., Tse, R. Y. C., & Edwards, D. J., Time-cost relationships in Australian building construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management (ASCE), Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 187-194, 2005
  8. Ireland, V., The Role of Managerial Actions in the Cost Time and Quality Performance of High-Rise Commercial Building Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 3(1), 59-87, 1985
  9. Choudhury, I. & Rajan, S. S. Time-Cost Relationship for Residential Construction in Texas. CIB, 2003
  10. Ng, S., Mak, M., Skitmore, R. & Varnam, M. The Predictive Ability of Bromilow’s Time-Cost Model. Construction Management and Economics, 19(2), 165-173, 2001
  11. Kaka, A., & Price, A. D., Relationship between value and duration of construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 9(4), 383-400, 1991
  12. Kumaraswamy, M., Chan, D., Determinants of Construction Duration Construction Management and Economics, 13(3), 209-217, 1995
  13. Hoffman, G. J., Thal Jr., A. E., Webb, T. S. & Weir, J. D., Estimating Performance Time for Construction Projects. 23, 193-199, 2006
  14. Chan, A., Time-Cost Relationship of public sector pro