Journals / European journal of rhinology and allergy (Online) / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience

Pages
58–62
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The nasal reconstruction technique should be individualized based on the size, and depth, and location of the defect that occurs after tumor excision.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The nose is a common site for skin tumors because of its location on the face and it being exposed to sun.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate the tumor characteristics and reconstruction techniques in patients who underwent surgery for nasal skin tumors.Material and Methods: Eighty-six patients who were operated in Manisa, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery between 2007 and 2017 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The nasal reconstruction technique should be individualized based on the size, and depth, and location of the defect that occurs after tumor excision.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The nose is a common site for skin tumors because of its location on the face and it being exposed to sun. This study aimed to evaluate the tumor characteristics and reconstruction techniques in patients who underwent surgery for nasal skin tumors.Material and Methods: Eighty-six patients who were operated in Manisa, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery between 2007 and 2017 were included in the study. The sociodemographic data, size, depth, volume, and histopathological type of the tumor; the reconstruction technique; and surgical outcomes were evaluated.Results: The mean age of all patients was 64.8 years (range between 18 and 86 years). Among them, 45 patients were female, and 41 were male. Tumor histopathology was defined as basal cell carcinoma in 57 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in 14 patients, malignant melanoma in one patient, and solar keratosis in three patients. Local and regional flaps were used in 57 patients, primary repair in 17 patients, skin grafts in eight patients, and other techniques in four patients. The paramedian forehead flap and the melolabial flap were the most common and the second most common flap techniques, respectively.Conclusion: The most common histopathological type in nasal skin tumors is basal cell carcinoma. The nasal reconstruction technique should be individualized based on the size, and depth, and location of the defect that occurs after tumor excision.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKER, G. T., TEMİZ, P., DOMBAYCI, O., ESKİİZMİR, G. (2022). The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience. European journal of rhinology and allergy (Online), Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 58–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/511968

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Eskiizmir G, Baker S, Cingi C. Nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck: reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20: 493-513. [CrossRef] 2. Eskiizmir G, Ozgur E, Temiz P, Gencoglan G, Ermertcan AT. The evaluation of tumor histopathology, location, characteristic, size and thickness of nonmelanoma skin cancers of the head and neck. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2012; 22: 91-8. [CrossRef] 3. Eskiizmir G, Hırcın Z, Unlu H. A practical method for designing paramedian forehead flap: a preliminary report. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2010; 30: 1210-3. [CrossRef] 4. Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Restoration of the face covering by means of selected skin in regional aesthetic units. Br J Plast Surg 1956; 9: 212-21. [CrossRef] 5. Millard DR Jr. Aesthetic reconstructive rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1981; 8: 169-75. 6. Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 239-47. [CrossRef] 7. Menick FJ. Artistry in aesthetic surgery. Aesthetic perception and the subunit principle. Clin Plast Surg 1987; 14: 723-35. 8. Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ, Potter JK. Nasal reconstruction-beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-yearreview of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 114: 1405-16. 9. Katalinic A, Kunze U, Schäfer T. Epidemiology ofcutaneous melanoma and non-melanoma skincancer in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany: incidence, clinical subtypes, tumour stages and localization (epidemiology of skin cancer). Br J Dermatol 2003; 149: 1200-6. [CrossRef] 10. Kasap Ş, Pektaş ML, Dere Y, Altıparmak M. Retrospective Evaluation of Skin Cancer Patients in Muğla. Medical Journal of Mugla Sitki Kocman University 2015; 2: 34-7. 11. Avcı G. Retrospective Analysis of Skin Cancers. Turk Plast Surg 2009; 17: 91-6. 12. Armstrong BK, Kricker A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B 2001; 63: 8-18. [CrossRef] 13. Miller DL, Weinstock MA. Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30: 774-8. [CrossRef] 14. Alam M, Ratner D. Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 975-83. [CrossRef] 15. Netscher DT, Leong M, OrengoI, Yang D, Berg C, Krishnan B. Cutaneous malignancies: melanoma and nonmelanoma types. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 37-56. [CrossRef] 16. Kim HS, Cho EA, Bae JM, Yu DS, Oh ST, Kang H, et al. Recent trend in the incidence of premalignant and malignant skin lesions in Korea between 1991 and 2006. J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25: 924-9. [CrossRef]