Journals / European journal of rhinology and allergy (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Perspectives on Rhinology Postgraduate Training and Education

Pages
39–43
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The sustainability of the training appears to be an important concern that needs to be addressed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to discuss perspectives of the 2016-2018 Turkish Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Society Rhinology-Rhinoplasty-Allergy and Sleep School (RS) postgraduate training and education.Material and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of aspects related to the postgraduate rhinology training and education of students admitted to the RS for the 2016-2018 education periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The average scores of the feedback received for lectures were 3.95/5 and 4.05/5 for each semester, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The sustainability of the training appears to be an important concern that needs to be addressed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to discuss perspectives of the 2016-2018 Turkish Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Society Rhinology-Rhinoplasty-Allergy and Sleep School (RS) postgraduate training and education.Material and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of aspects related to the postgraduate rhinology training and education of students admitted to the RS for the 2016-2018 education periods. The following data was collected and reviewed: criteria for student admission to the school, student age and gender, institution of practice, qualification document status, training course content, pre-test, and post-test results, place of training activities in the total time, sites for clinic visitations and their durations, educational activities carried out during the visitations and student feedback.Results: Fifteen students were accepted in the two consecutive semesters. The academic program of the RS comprised four days of lectures, a day of cadaver dissection, and five days of clinic visitations. The average scores of the feedback received for lectures were 3.95/5 and 4.05/5 for each semester, respectively. Regarding the correct result ratio for pre- and post-test students presented was a statistically positive change in the level of knowledge (p=0.001).Conclusion: The training program of the RS, conducted by Otorhinolaryngology Schools (ORL-S), has contributed to the process of obtaining information on the day of training and was evaluated positively by the participants. The student presented positive feedback about the full curriculum, however revealed some organizational drawbacks. The main outcome, the impact on behavioral change, has not been evaluated and it has been observed that rhinology school education is not sufficiently structured to evaluate this. The sustainability of the training appears to be an important concern that needs to be addressed.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, S., ECEVİT, M. C., EREN, E. (2022). Perspectives on Rhinology Postgraduate Training and Education. European journal of rhinology and allergy (Online), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 39–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/511907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Davis N, Davis D, Bloch R. Continuing medical education: AMEE Education Guide No 35. Med Teach 2008
  2. [Crossref] 2. Türk Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Derneği. Türk Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Derneği Tüzük. Available from: https://www.kbb.org.tr/Custom/Upload/Document/KBBC-DERNEK-TUZUK-20192159119.pdf. 3. Türk Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Derneği. KBB Okulları Eğitim Kredilendirme Yönergesi. Available from: http://kbbokullari.kbb.org.tr/file/KBB%20Okulları%20Eğitim%20Kredilendirme%20Yönergesi.pdf. 4. Patil NG. The postgraduate curriculum. Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone
  3. p.31. 5. Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE, editors. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders
  4. VanNieuwenborg L, Goossens M, De Lepeleire J, Schoenmakers B. Continuing medical education for general practitioners: A practice format. Postgrad Med J 2016
  5. [Crossref] 7. Levine DM, Barsky AJ III, Fox RC, Freidin RB, Williams SR, Wysong JA. Trends in medical education research: Past, present, and future. J Med Educ 1974
  6. [Crossref] 8. Levine HG, McGuire CH. Rating habitual performance in graduate medical education. J Med Educ 1971
  7. [Crossref] 9. Price D. Continuing medical education, quality improvement, and organizational change: Implications of recent theories for twenty-first-century CME. Med Teach 2005
  8. [Crossref] 10. Campbell C, Silver I, Sherbino J, Cate OT, Holmboe ES. Competency-based continuing professional development. Med Teach 2010
  9. [Crossref] 11. Parboosingh IJ, Reed VA, Caldwell Palmer J, Bernstein HH. Enhancing practice improvement by facilitating practitioner interactivity: New roles for providers of continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2011
  10. [Crossref] 12. Reed VA, Schifferdecker KE, Turco MG. Motivating learning and assessing outcomes in continuing medical education using a personal learning plan. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2012
  11. [Crossref] 13. Al-Azri H, Ratnapalan S. Problem-based learning in continuing medical education: Review of randomized controlled trials. Can Fam Physician 2014
  12. Savery JR. Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdiscip J Probl Based Learn 2006
  13. [Crossref] 15. Balmer JT, Bellande BJ, Addleton RL, Have