Journals / European journal of rhinology and allergy (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A single center experience

Pages
94–98
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a surgical treatment method, endonasal endoscopic approaches have largely replaced transcranial approaches in recent years due to its high success rate and low morbidity profile

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the surgical methods and results according to the defect diameter and location, together with clinical and radiological findings in patients diagnosed with rhinorrhea in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Six patients diag- nosed with rhinorrhea between March 2015 and August 2020 in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a surgical treatment method, endonasal endoscopic approaches have largely replaced transcranial approaches in recent years due to its high success rate and low morbidity profile
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study is to examine the surgical methods and results according to the defect diameter and location, together with clinical and radiological findings in patients diagnosed with rhinorrhea in our clinic. Six patients diag- nosed with rhinorrhea between March 2015 and August 2020 in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic features, clinical findings, imaging findings, and surgi- cal treatment methods were analyzed. The age range is between 32 and 60 years, the mean age of the patients is 48.6. All six patients had a complaint of nasal discharge, which increased with leaning forward. Two patients had spontane- ous rhinorrhea (2/6), two patients had traffic accident history accompanied by head trauma (2/6), in the history of other two patients included previous nasal surgery (2/6). The initial diagnosis of rhinorrhea was confirmed by studying b-2 transferrin in the samples collected from the nasal discharges of all patients. Brain magnetic resonance imaging and paranasal sinus computed tomography imaging were performed in all patients to identify the defect site. The defect site was in the lamina cribrosa in three patients (3/6; 7.4, 2, and 3 mm), in two patients, the defect site was in the sphenoid sinus lateral recess (2/6; 3.6 and 2.6 mm), and in one patient, the defect site was in posterosuperior wall of the sphenoid sinus (1/6; 3 mm). All patients underwent surgery with the endonasal endoscopic method. Surgical treatment is necessary to prevent life-threatening complications in patients with rhinorrhea. In suspected cases of rhin- orrhea, the diagnosis of rhinorrhea is confirmed, and various surgical materials and methods are applied according to the defect location and size. As a surgical treatment method, endonasal endoscopic approaches have largely replaced transcranial approaches in recent years due to its high success rate and low morbidity profile

🔖

Cite This Article

Yazıcı, Z. M., Gülüstan, F., Gürlek, I. Ö., Aydın, E., Gülaever, A. B., Yegül, D., Sayın, İ. (2022). Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A single center experience. European journal of rhinology and allergy (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 94–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/511896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ommaya AK, Di Chiro G, Baldwin M, Pennybacker JB. Non-traumatic cerebro- spinal fluid rhinorrhoea. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968
  2. 31(3):214-225. [CrossRef] 2. Loew F, Pertuiset B, Chaumier EE, Jaksche H. Traumatic, spontaneous and postoperative CSF rhinorrhea. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 1984
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Nandapalan V, Watson ID, Swift AC. Beta-2-transferrin and cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. Clin Otolaryngol. 1996
  4. 21(3):259-264. [CrossRef] 4. Arrer E, Meco C, Oberascher G, et al. Beta-trace protein as a marker for cere- brospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Clin Chem. 2002
  5. 48(6):939-941. [CrossRef] 5. Lund VJ, Savy L, Lloyd G, Howard D. Optimum imaging and diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. J Laryngol Otol. 2000
  6. [Cross- Ref] 6. Pool CD, Patel VA, Schilling A, Hollenbeak C, Goyal N. Economic implications of localization strategies for cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020
  7. 10(3):419-425. [CrossRef] 7. Georgalas C, Oostra A, Ahmed S, et al. International consensus statement. Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021
  8. 11(4):794-803. 8. Oakley GM, Alt JA, Schlosser RJ, Harvey RJ, Orlandi RR. Diagnosis of cerebro- spinal fluid rhinorrhea: An evidence-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016
  9. 6(1):8-16. [CrossRef] 9. Aarabi B, Leibrock LG. Neurosurgical approaches to cerebrospinal fluid rhin- orrhea. Ear Nose Throat J. 1992
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Ibrahim AA, Okasha M, Elwany S. Endoscopic endonasal multilayer repair of traumatic CSF rhinorrhea. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016
  11. 273(4):921-926. [CrossRef] 11. Meurman O, Irjala K, Suonpaa J, Laurent B: A new method of identification of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Acta Otolaryngol. 1979
  12. 87(3-6):366-369. [CrossRef] 12. Oberascher G, Arrer E. Efficiency of various methods of identifying cerebro- spinal fluid in oto- and rhinorrhea. Oto Rhinolaryng. 1986
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Bubshait RF, Almomen AA. The endonasal endoscopic management of cere- brospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Cureus. 2021
  14. 13(2):e13457. [CrossRef] 14. Soudry E, Turner JH, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Endoscopic reconstruction of sur- gically created skull base defects: A systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruc- tion of large dural defects: A systematic review of published evidence. Laryn- goscope. 2012
  16. 122(2):452-459. [CrossRef]