Journals / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Seronegative brucellosis of the spine: A case of psoas abscess secondary to brucellar spondylitis

Pages
185–187
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In patients, particularly those who live in areas endemic for brucellosis, as in our case, it should be kept in mind that a negative serological test result should not exclude the diagnosis of brucellosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Brucellosis is an infectious disease that affects many organ systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Osteoarticular involvement, especially spondylitis, is the most common complication of brucellosis, but psoas abscess is very rare.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In patients, particularly those who live in areas endemic for brucellosis, as in our case, it should be kept in mind that a negative serological test result should not exclude the diagnosis of brucellosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Brucellosis is an infectious disease that affects many organ systems. Osteoarticular involvement, especially spondylitis, is the most common complication of brucellosis, but psoas abscess is very rare. Serological tests at diagnosis of the disease are very valuable and most widely used. Herein, we report a case of psoas abscess secondary to brucellar spondylitis. In this case, interestingly, the serological test results were negative, and the diagnosis could be made by abscess culture. In patients, particularly those who live in areas endemic for brucellosis, as in our case, it should be kept in mind that a negative serological test result should not exclude the diagnosis of brucellosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZBAŞ, G. T., ÜNÜBOL, A. İ., GÜRER, G. (2022). Seronegative brucellosis of the spine: A case of psoas abscess secondary to brucellar spondylitis. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 185–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/511766

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aydın G, Tosun A, Keleş I, Ayaşlıoğlu E, Tosun O, Orkun S. Brucellar spondylodisciticis: a case report. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60: 1502-5. [CrossRef] 2. Çelik AD, Yulugkural Z, Kilincer C, Hamamcioglu MK, Kuloglu F, Akata F. Negative serology: could exclude the diagnosis of brucellosis? Rheumatol Int 2012; 32: 2547-9. [CrossRef] 3. Turgut M, Turgut AT, Kosar U. Spinal brucellosis: Turkish experience based on 452 cases published during the last century. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148: 1033-44. [CrossRef] 4. Bosilkovski M, Krteva L, Caparoska S, Dimzova M. Osteoarticular Involvement in Brucellosis: Study of 196 Cases in the Republic of Macedonia. Croat Med J 2004; 45: 727-33. 5. Navarro López V, Ramos JM, Meseguer V, Pérez Arellano JL, Serrano R, García Ordóñez MA, et al. Microbiology and outcome of iliopsoas abscess in 124 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2009; 88: 120-30. [CrossRef] 6. Guven GS, Cakir B, Oz G, Tanriover MD, Turkmen E, Sozen T. Could remembering the prozone phenomenon shorten our diagnostic journey in brucellosis? A case of Brucella spondylodiscitis. Rheumatol Int 2006; 26: 933-5. [CrossRef] 7. Alişkan H. The value of culture and serological methods in the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Mikrobiyol Bul 2008; 42: 185-95. 8. Young EJ. Brucella species. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R (eds). Principles and Practice of Infectious Disease 5.edition, Churchill Livingstone: Philadelphia; 2000. p. 2386. 9. Janmohammadi N, Roushan MR. False negative serological tests may lead to misdiagnosis and mismanagement in osteoarticular brucellosis. Trop Doct 2009; 39: 88-90. [CrossRef] 10. Chelli Bouaziz M, Ladeb MF, Chakroun M, Chaabane S. Spinal brucellosis: a review. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 785-90. [CrossRef] 11. Yang X, Zhang Q, Guo X. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in brucellar spondylodiscitis. Radiol Med 2014; 119: 928-33. [CrossRef]