SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering / 2017 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2

A NEW SIMILARITY COEFFICIENT FOR A COLLABORATIVE FILTERING ALGORITHM

Ozge MERCANOGLU SINCAN
Zeynep YILDIRIM
Pages
41–54
Publication Date
2017-12-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We used MAE and RMSE measures in our experiments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Recommender systems give the opportunity to present automatically personalized content across many digital marketing channels to visitors depending on visitor movements on the site.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We tested our algorithm in MovieLens 100K dataset and compared to other similarity functions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We used MAE and RMSE measures in our experiments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Recommendation systems · collaborative filtering · user similarity

Özet

Öz Recommender systems give the opportunity to present automatically personalized content across many digital marketing channels to visitors depending on visitor movements on the site. In recent years, there has been a lot of interest in e-commerce companies in order to offer personalized content. So, recommender systems become very popular and many studies have been done in this regard. New works are being done day by day to improve the results. In this paper, we propose a new memory-based collaborative filtering algorithm. Calculation of similarities between items or users is a critical step in memory-based CF algorithms. Therefore, we proposed a new function for calculation of similarities based on user ratings. In this study the more similar the user's pleasures are, the more similar it is to the products the users choose, is adopted. The adopted idea in this study is that the more similar the user's pleasures are, the more similar products are chosen. We estimate the degree which a user is interested in X product. To do this, we find other users who are interested in product X and calculate the similarity ratios of those users to the user. We tested our algorithm in MovieLens 100K dataset and compared to other similarity functions. We used MAE and RMSE measures in our experiments.

🔖

Cite This Article

SINCAN, O. M., YILDIRIM, Z. (2017). A NEW SIMILARITY COEFFICIENT FOR A COLLABORATIVE FILTERING ALGORITHM. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2, 41–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/51172

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Sincan, O.M., Yildirim, Z., “Video recommendation system using collaborative filtering”, International Conference on Advances in Science and Arts ICASA'2017, ( 2017).
  2. Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B. M., Terry, D. “Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry.” Communications of the ACM, 35/12 (1992) 61-70.
  3. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J. “GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews.” In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (1994), p. 175-186.
  4. Breese, J. S., Heckerman, D., Kadie, C. “Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering.” In Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, (1998), p. 43-52.
  5. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Riedl, J. “Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations.” In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (2000), p. 241-250.
  6. Yu, K., Schwaighofer, A., Tresp, V., Xu, X., Kriegel, H. P. “Probabilistic memory-based collaborative filtering.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16/1(2004) 56-69.
  7. Yang, J. M., Li, K. F. “Recommendation based on rational inferences in collaborative filtering.” Knowledge-Based Systems, 22/1 (2009) 105-114.
  8. Adamopoulos, P., Tuzhilin, A. “Recommendation opportunities: improving item prediction using weighted percentile methods in collaborative filtering systems.” In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems, (2013), p. 351-354).
  9. Bulut, H., Milli, M. “İşbirlikçi filtreleme için yeni tahminleme yöntemleri.” Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 22/2(2016) 123-128.
  10. Gogna, A., Majumdar, A. “A comprehensive recommender system model: Improving accuracy for both warm and cold start users.” IEEE Access, 3(2015) 2803-2813.
  11. Luo, X., Zhou, M., Xia, Y., Zhu, Q. “An efficient non-negative matrix-factorization-based approach to collaborative filtering for recommender systems.“ IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10/2(2014) 1273-1284.
  12. Hernando, A., Bobadilla, J., Ortega, F. “A non negative matrix factorization for collaborative filtering recommender systems based on a Bayesian probabilistic model.” Knowledge-Based Systems, 97(2016), 188-202.
  13. Yang, X., Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Steck, H. “A survey of collaborative filtering based social recommender systems.” Computer Communications, 41(2014) 1-10.
  14. Yang, Z., Wu, B., Zheng, K., Wang, X., Lei, L. “A Sur