Journals / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Joint scores in hemophilic arthropathy in children: Developing country perspectives

Pages
26–30
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All of the USG score, MRI score, and FISH score have a significant correlation (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Hemophilia is a common X-linked recessive coagulopathy causing recurrent bleeding into the synovial joints and results in articular and periarticular abnormalities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The joint physical examination was scored using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS 2.1).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All of the USG score, MRI score, and FISH score have a significant correlation (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Hemophilia is a common X-linked recessive coagulopathy causing recurrent bleeding into the synovial joints and results in articular and periarticular abnormalities. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study aimed at studying the clinico-radiological joint score evaluation in hemophilic arthropathy in children from a developing country and its possible impact on the quality of life.Methods: In this hospital-based, prospective, descriptive study, all children presenting to the pediatric rheumatology clinic were studied. The joint physical examination was scored using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS 2.1). The patients were then subjected to imaging of the most affected joint using ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Detailed USG and MRI radiological evaluation was recorded in the predesigned proforma using the Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultra Sound (HEAD-US) score and MRI DENVER score. The physical quality of life as per Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) was noted. The clinical, radiological, and functional scores were analyzed with an appropriate statistical measure.Results: The mean age at presentation was 7.4 years (interquartile range 4.9-10), with the knee being the most common joint involved. All of the USG score, MRI score, and FISH score have a significant correlation (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GUHA, A., RAI, A., NANDY, A., Mondal, T., PANDIT, N., GUHA, S., GUPTA, D., MONDAL, R. (2022). Joint scores in hemophilic arthropathy in children: Developing country perspectives. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 26–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/511549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Roosendaal, Rinsum V, Vianen, Berg VD, Lafeber, Bijlsma. Haemophilic arthropathy resembles degenerative rather than inflammatory joint disease. Histopathology 1999; 34: 144-53. [CrossRef] 2. Arnold WD, Hilgartner MW. Haemophilic arthropathy. Current concepts of pathogenesis and management. J Bone Joint Surg 1977; 59; 287-305. [CrossRef] 3. Madhok R, York J, Sturrock RD. Haemophilic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1991; 50; 588-91. [CrossRef] 4. Aledort LM, Haschmeyer RH, Pettersson H. A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor-VIII-deficient haemophiliacs. The Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group. J Int Med 1994; 236; 391-9. [CrossRef] 5. Petrini P, Lindvall N, Egberg N, Blomback M. Prophylaxis withfactor concentrates in preventing haemophilic arthropathy. Am J Ped Hematol Oncol 1991; 13; 280-7. [CrossRef] 6. Soreff J, Blomback M. Arthropathy in children with severehemophilia A. Acta Paedriatr Scand 1980; 69; 667-73. [CrossRef] 7. Lusher JM. Considerations for recurrent and future management of haemophilia and its complications. Haemophilia 1995; 1; 2-10. [CrossRef] 8. Nilsson IM, Bertorp E, Lofqvist T, Pettersson H. Twenty-five years’ experience of prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia A and B. J Int Med 1992; 232; 25-32. [CrossRef] 9. Resnick D. Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2002. 10. Berquist TH. MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system, 5thedn. In: Elbow and Forearm. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006. p. 708-9. 11. Jaganathan S, Gamanagatti S, Goyal A. Musculoskeletal Manifestations of Hemophilia: Imaging Features. Cur Prob Diagn Radiol 2011; 40: 191-7. [CrossRef] 12. Valentino LA, Hakobyan N, Rodriguez N, Hoots WK. Pathogenesis of haemophilic synovitis: experimental studies on blood-induced joint damage. Haemophilia 2007; 13 (Suppl 3): 10-3. [CrossRef] 13. Roosendaal G, Lafeber FP. Pathogenesis of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2006; 12: 117-21. [CrossRef] 14. Haxaire C, Kalliolias G, Dicarlo E, Salmon J, Srivastava A, Blobel C. Blood-Induced Arthropathy in Hemophilia: Mechanisms and Heterogeneity. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41: 832-7. [CrossRef] 15. Bladen M, Main E, Hubert N, Koutoumanou E, Liesner R, Khair K. Factors affecting the Haemophilia Joint Health Score in children with severe haemophilia. Haemophilia 2013; 19: 626-31. [CrossRef] 16. Martinoli Carlo, Alberighi Ornella Della Casa, Di MinnoGiovanni, GrazianoErmelinda, Molinari Angelo Claudio,Pasta Gia