Journals / European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (elektronik) / 2010 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Stepwise variable selection for loglinear mixtures in record linkage

Pages
141–162
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We have applied this strategy to the record linkage case study in 2006 Annual Meeting of Statistical Society of Canada (SSC) and identified interactions among certain comparison attributes for both matched and unmatched pairs; these interactions are not always the same for both mixture components. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 62F07, 62F10, 62J99, 62P25

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A model building strategy is proposed to improve the probabilistic match in record linkage with focus on the loglinear mixture model of two components, each for the matched and unmatched pairs respectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The proposed strategy is data-driven, and attempts to avoid both underfitting and overfitting due to subjective model specification for the data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We have applied this strategy to the record linkage case study in 2006 Annual Meeting of Statistical Society of Canada (SSC) and identified interactions among certain comparison attributes for both matched and unmatched pairs; these interactions are not always the same for both mixture components. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 62F07, 62F10, 62J99, 62P25
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A model building strategy is proposed to improve the probabilistic match in record linkage with focus on the loglinear mixture model of two components, each for the matched and unmatched pairs respectively. In reality, comparison attributes (i.e., covariates) often interact with each other, leading to more or less interactions in the loglinear models for both the matched and unmatched pairs. However, the interactions patterns are often not the same for both components. Particularly, because the number of matched pairs is usually very small compared with that of unmatched pairs in practice, the model for matched pairs can not be fitted with the same higher order interactions as that for the unmatched pairs. The proposed strategy is data-driven, and attempts to avoid both underfitting and overfitting due to subjective model specification for the data. Starting from the situation of no interaction, we add interactions sequentially in two loglinear components using the forward selection approach. Specifically, we define the alternatively climbing pathways through mixture families of two components with higher order interactions. The mixture models expanded along a pathway are nested successively. Thus, conventional tests used for comparison of nested models can be applied. Regarding parameter estimation for the mixture, a simplified method (including the choice of initial values of parameters) for the EM algorithm is developed, which facilitates the mixture model fitting using existing packages and functions in sophisticated statistical software like R. Simulation studies have then been conducted for various situations to assess the model selection approach, and comparisons of the selected models with the naive model assuming field independence have been made. We have applied this strategy to the record linkage case study in 2006 Annual Meeting of Statistical Society of Canada (SSC) and identified interactions among certain comparison attributes for both matched and unmatched pairs; these interactions are not always the same for both mixture components. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 62F07, 62F10, 62J99, 62P25

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHU, R., ZHANG, J., ZHANG, D., YAN, G. (2022). Stepwise variable selection for loglinear mixtures in record linkage. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (elektronik), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 141–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/511343

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. E. D. Acheson. Record Linkage in Medicine. E. & S. Livingstone Ltd., Edinburgh and London, 1968
  2. A. Agresti. Categorical Data Analysis, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2002
  3. J. B. Copas and F. J. Hilton. Record linkage: Statistical models for matching computer records. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 153:287–320, 1990
  4. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 39:1–38, 1977
  5. M. E. Fair and P. Whitridge. Tutorial on record linkage. In W. Alvey and B. Jamerson, editors, Record Linkage Techniques - 1997: Proceedings of an International Workshop and Exposition., pages 457–482, Arlington, VA, 1997. Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, and Office of Management and Budget
  6. I. P. Fellegi and A. B. Sunter. A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64:1183–1210, 1969
  7. M. A. Jaro. Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of tampa florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84:414–420, 1989
  8. M. A. Jaro. Probabilistic linkage of large public health datafiles. Statistics in Medicine, 14:491–498, 1995
  9. M. D. Larsen. Modeling issues and the use of experience in record linkage. In W. Alvey and B. Jamerson, editors, Record Linkage Techniques - 1997: Proceedings of an Interna- tional Workshop and Exposition., pages 95–105, Arlington, VA, 1997. Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, and Office of Management and Budget
  10. M. D. Larsen and D. B. Rubin. Iterative automated record linkage using mixture models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96:32–41, 2001
  11. G. J. McLachlan and T. Krishnan. The EM algorithm and extensions. Wiley, New York, 1997
  12. H. B. Newcombe. Handbook of Record Linkage: Methods for Health and Statistical Studies, Administration, and Business. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, 1988
  13. H. B. Newcombe, J. M. Kennedy, S. J. Axford, and A. P. James. Automatic linkage of vital records. Science, 130:954–959, 1959
  14. Y. Thibaudeau. The discrimination power of dependency structures in record linkage. Survey Methodology, 19:31–38, 1993
  15. W. E. Winkler. Using the em algorithm for weight computation in the fellegi-sunter model of record linkage. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods., pages 667–671. American Statistical A