Journals / European Journal of Forensic Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Capital punishment: An eye for an eye-right or wrong?

Pages
10–14
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A statistical difference exists in the perceptional view among law and medical students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In the world we live in, there were certain issues that had gone through a series of discussions among various sectors of the society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A questionnaire which contains 12 objective type questions was distributed to 200 medical and 100 law students and their perception regarding capital punishment is assessed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A statistical difference exists in the perceptional view among law and medical students.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: In the world we live in, there were certain issues that had gone through a series of discussions among various sectors of the society. One such issue is capital punishment, and debate still continues through different angles of arguments. Objective: This questionnaire study aims to understand the perception of Medical and Law students in Mangalore toward capital punishment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire which contains 12 objective type questions was distributed to 200 medical and 100 law students and their perception regarding capital punishment is assessed. Result and Conclusion: This was a cross-sectional study among a group of medical and law students in Mangalore. Our study suggested a positive attitude toward capital punishment among both set of students. The minority group who opposed it had done the same on humanitarian grounds. Hanging was suggested as the preferred method of capital punishment followed by chemical injection. Murder, rape, and terrorism were the three major crimes which deserved capital punishment in accordance with both the subject groups. A statistical difference exists in the perceptional view among law and medical students.

🔖

Cite This Article

BABU, B., VASWANİ, V., KUMAR, K., NALLATHAMBY, R. (2022). Capital punishment: An eye for an eye-right or wrong?. European Journal of Forensic Sciences, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 10–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/510933

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Lambert E, Clarke A. Crime, capital punishment, and knowledge: Are criminal justice majors better informed than other majors about crime and capital punishment? Soc Sci J 2004;41:53-66.
  2. Mancini C, Mears D. To execute or not to execute? Examining public support for capital punishment of sex offenders. J Crim Justice 2010;38:959-68.
  3. Maggarda SR, Payneb BK. Attitudes toward capital punishment: Educational, demographic, and neighborhood crime influences. Soc Sci J 2012;49:155-66. Ehrilch I. The deterrent effect of capital punishment, a question of life and death. Am Econ Rev 1975;65:397-417. Vogel LB. The age of death: Appraising public opinion of juvenile Capital punishment. J Crim Justice 2003;31:169-83. Bohm R. Death Quest: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment in the United States. Cincinnati, OH: NCJRS; 1999. O'Shea K. Women and the Death Penalty in the United States 1900- 1998. London: Praeger; 1999. Schabas W. The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. King LR. Society's Final Solution: A History and Discussion of the Death Penalty. Lanham, MD.: University Press of America; 1997. Streib VL. Death Penalty for Female Offenders January 1, 1973 to June 30, 2007. Ohio Southern University; 2003.