Journals / European Journal of Breast Health / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction

Pages
207–212
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, 72.6% said the exam was shorter.Conclusion: Self-compression technique decreases pain and anxiety of women during mammography examinations and promises to enhancecompliance of clients and patients with follow-up mammography recommendations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to evaluate the mammography experience of patients using a manually controlled self- compression tool compared to theirprevious experience based on technician performed breast compression by a questionnaire survey study.Materials and Methods: Th survey studies of 365 patients who underwent screening or diagnostic mammography between April 2017 andJuly 2017 at our center were reviewed retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Each patient had completed a 12-item questionnaire following mammography examinations.Women who never had a mammography before or who had a previous mammography examination more than 2 years ago or who did not want touse the self-compression device were excluded from the study. 106 women were included in the study.Results: Patient satisfaction was high.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, 72.6% said the exam was shorter.Conclusion: Self-compression technique decreases pain and anxiety of women during mammography examinations and promises to enhancecompliance of clients and patients with follow-up mammography recommendations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the mammography experience of patients using a manually controlled self- compression tool compared to theirprevious experience based on technician performed breast compression by a questionnaire survey study.Materials and Methods: Th survey studies of 365 patients who underwent screening or diagnostic mammography between April 2017 andJuly 2017 at our center were reviewed retrospectively. Each patient had completed a 12-item questionnaire following mammography examinations.Women who never had a mammography before or who had a previous mammography examination more than 2 years ago or who did not want touse the self-compression device were excluded from the study. 106 women were included in the study.Results: Patient satisfaction was high. Regarding the comparison of the experience of the exam to previous ones, 70.8% said it was a better experience. Th examination was found comfortable by 85.4% of the participants and 75.5% found the examination more comfortable compared to previous ones. Only 11.3% were anxious and 52.8% declared they were less anxious compared to previous examinations. Regarding the attractiveness ofthe new design, 66.9% declared they found the new design attractive, 39.7% found it more attractive than previous examinations, and 27.3% saidthe new design decreased anxiety. In the evaluation of impact of patient-assisted compression (PAC) on comfort, 80.2% said that they found it morecomfortable and 64.2% said that PAC decreased anxiety. Furthermore, 72.6% said the exam was shorter.Conclusion: Self-compression technique decreases pain and anxiety of women during mammography examinations and promises to enhancecompliance of clients and patients with follow-up mammography recommendations.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, A., ARIBAL, E., ULUS, S., KOVAN, Ö., ELPEN, P. (2022). A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. European Journal of Breast Health, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 207–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/510797

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Smith RA, Duff SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. Th randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004
  2. (PMID: 15337416) [CrossRef] 2. Tabár L, Yen AM, Wu WY, Chen SL, Chiu SY, Fann JC, Ku MM, Smith RA, Duff SW, Chen TH. Insights from the breast cancer screening trials: how screening affcts the natural history of breast cancer and implications for evaluating service screening programs. Breast J 2015
  3. (PMID: 25413699) [CrossRef] 3. Perry N, BroedersM, deWolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. Ann Oncol 2008
  4. (PMID: 18024988) [CrossRef] 4. Helvie MA, Chan HP, Adler DD, Boyd PG. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effct on image quality and radiation dose. American journal of roentgenology 1994
  5. (PMID: 7992731) [CrossRef] 5. Heine JJ, Cao K, Thmas JA. Effctive radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness inflences and correction. Biomed Eng Online 2010
  6. (PMID: 21080916) [CrossRef] 6. Keemers-Gels ME, Groenendijk RP, van den Heuvel JH, Boetes C, Peer PG, Wobbes TH. Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000
  7. (PMID: 10930111) [CrossRef] 7. Shrestha S, Poulos A. Th effct of verbal information on the experience of discomfort in mammography. Radiography 2001
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Yılmaz M, Kıymaz Ö. Anxiety and pain associated with process mammography: inflence of process information before. J Breast Health 2010
  9. Lambertz CK, Johnson CJ, Montgomery PG, Maxwell JR. Premedication to reduce discomfort during screening mammography. Radiology 2008
  10. (PMID: 18647845) [CrossRef] 10. Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Sullivan DC, Catoe KE, Stout AL, Brackett JS. Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology 1993
  11. (PMID: 8416595) [CrossRef] 11. Balleyguier C, Cousin M, Dunant A, Attard M, Delaloge S, ArfiRouche J. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography. Eur J Cancer 2018
  12. (PMID: 30223227) [CrossRef] 12. Tabar L, Lebovic GS, Hermann GD, Kaufman CS, Alexander C, Sayre J. Clinical assessment of a radiolucent cushion for mammography. Acta Radiol 2004
  13. (PMID: 15191098) [CrossR