SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Endodontic Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Cleaning Ability of Irrigants and Orange Oil Solvent Combination in the Removal of Root Canal Filling Materials

Karina Rodrigues SALGADO
Roberta Fonseca de CASTRO
Marina Carvalho Prado
Gustavo Antônio BRANDÃO
Juliana Melo da SILVA
Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da SILVA
Pages
33–37
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Groups in which a solvent was used showed a less effective cleaning ability (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study investigated the influence of different irrigants and the use of orange oil solvent in the removal of filling materials during root canal retreatment.Methods: Forty maxillary premolars were shaped using the ProTaper System up to file F3 (size 30, 0.09 taper) and filled by Tagger’s hybrid technique using the AH Plus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Samples were randomly assigned to four groups (n=10) according to the irrigating protocol during endodontic retreatment with the ProTaper Universal Re-treatment System: G1, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel; G2, 2% CHX gel with an orange oil solvent; G3, 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); and G4, 5% NaOCl with an orange oil solvent.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Groups in which a solvent was used showed a less effective cleaning ability (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the influence of different irrigants and the use of orange oil solvent in the removal of filling materials during root canal retreatment.Methods: Forty maxillary premolars were shaped using the ProTaper System up to file F3 (size 30, 0.09 taper) and filled by Tagger’s hybrid technique using the AH Plus. Samples were randomly assigned to four groups (n=10) according to the irrigating protocol during endodontic retreatment with the ProTaper Universal Re-treatment System: G1, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel; G2, 2% CHX gel with an orange oil solvent; G3, 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); and G4, 5% NaOCl with an orange oil solvent. Afterwards, the samples were longitu-dinally split into two halves, and the root wall images were prepared by scanning electron microscopy. Two pre-calibrated evaluators analyzed the images using a filling materials remnants score system. Data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s tests (pG1=G3. No statistical differences were found when the CHX and NaOCl were used (p>0.05). Groups in which a solvent was used showed a less effective cleaning ability (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SALGADO, K. R., CASTRO, R. F. D., Prado, M. C., BRANDÃO, G. A., SILVA, J. M. D., SILVA, E. J. N. L. D. (2022). Cleaning Ability of Irrigants and Orange Oil Solvent Combination in the Removal of Root Canal Filling Materials. European Endodontic Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 33–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/510484

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Scelza MF, Coil JM, Maciel AC, Oliveira LR, Scelza P. Comparative SEM evaluation of three solvents used in endodontic retreatment: an ex vivo study. J Appl Oral Sci 2008
  2. 16(1):24–9. [CrossRef ] 2. Özyürek T, Demiryürek EÖ. Efficacy of Different Nickel-Titanium Instru-ments in Removing Gutta-percha during RootCanal Retreatment. J En-dod 2016
  3. 42(4):646–9. [CrossRef ] 3. Da Rosa RA, Santini MF, Cavenago BC, Pereira JR, Duarte MA, Só MV. Mi-cro-CT Evaluation of Root Filling Removal after Three Stages of Retreat-ment Procedure. Braz Dent J 2015
  4. 26(6):612–8. [CrossRef ] 4. Yürüker S, Görduysus M, Küçükkaya S, Uzunoğlu E, Ilgın C, Gülen O, et al. Efficacy of Combined Use of Different Nickel-Titanium Files on Removing Root Canal Filling Materials. J Endod 2016
  5. 42(3):487–92. [CrossRef ] 5. Monguilhott Crozeta B, Damião de Sousa-Neto M, Bianchi Leoni G, Fran-cisco Mazzi-Chaves J, Terezinha Corrêa Silva-Sousa Y, Baratto-Filho F. A micro-computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of rotary and reciprocatingtechniques for filling material removal in root canal retreat-ment. Clin Oral Investig 2016
  6. 20(8):2235–40. [CrossRef ] 6. Blank-Gonçalves LM, Nabeshima CK, Martins GH, Machado ME. Qualita-tive analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems. J Endod 2011
  7. 37(9):1268–71. [CrossRef ] 7. Saber Sel-D, Hashem AA. Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal. J Endod 2011
  8. 37(9):1272–5. [CrossRef ] 8. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006
  9. 32(5):389–98. [CrossRef ] 9. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Zaia AA, Almeida JF, Souza-Filho FJ, Ferraz CC. Chlorhexidine in endodontics. Braz Dent J 2013
  10. 24(2):89–102. [CrossRef ] 10. Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assess-ment of the antimicrobial action and the mechanical ability of chlorhexi-dinegel as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod 2001
  11. 27(7):452–5. [CrossRef ] 11. Rosenthal S, Spångberg L, Safavi K. Chlorhexidine substantivity in root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004
  12. 98(4):488–92. [CrossRef ] 12. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of smear layer against disinfec-tion protocols on Enterococcus faecalis-infected dentin. J Endod 2013
  13. 39(11):1395–400. [CrossRef ] 13. Bramante CM, Fidelis NS, Assumpção TS, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bra-mante AS, et al. Heat release, time required, and cleaning ability of MTwo R and ProTaper univer