SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Ticari yumurtacı tavuklarda Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale enfeksiyonunun serolojik prevalansı

Serologic prevalence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in commercial layers

Gokcenur SANİOGLU
Zeki ARAS
Zafer SAYİN
Pages
22–25
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that O. rhinotracheale infection is at high prevalence in the commercial layer flocks from this part of Turkey

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aras Z, Sayin Z, Sanioglu G.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 650 blood serum samples were collected from 26 different layer flocks located in Konya, Aksaray, Karaman, Ankara, and Gaziantep provinces.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that O. rhinotracheale infection is at high prevalence in the commercial layer flocks from this part of Turkey
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aras Z, Sayin Z, Sanioglu G. Serologic prevalence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in commercial layers.Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the serological prevalence of Ornithobacterium (O.) rhinotracheale infections in commercial layers. Materials and Methods: A total of 650 blood serum samples were collected from 26 different layer flocks located in Konya, Aksaray, Karaman, Ankara, and Gaziantep provinces. None of the chickens have been vaccinated against O. rhinotracheale prior to sampling. The presence of antibodies against O. rhinotracheale in each sample was determined by ELISA. Results: Of the 650 serum samples, 113 (17.4%) were found to be positive for O. rhinotracheale antibodies. These 113 positive sera were collected from 12 (46.2%) out of 26 flocks. The twelve infected flocks belonged to 12 different farms form Konya, Gaziantep, Ankara and Karaman. Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that O. rhinotracheale infection is at high prevalence in the commercial layer flocks from this part of Turkey

Özet

. Amaç: Bu çalışmada ticari yumurtacı tavuk işletmelerinde bulunan tavuklarda Ornithobacterium (O.) rhinotracheale enfeksiyonunun serolojik prevalansının belirlenmesi amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Konya, Aksaray, Karaman, Ankara ve Gaziantep illerinde bulunan 26 farklı kümesteki yumurtacı tavuklardan 650 kan serum örneği toplandı. Örnekleme yapılan tavukların hiç birisi daha önceden O. rhinotracheale enfeksiyonuna karşı aşılanmamışlardı. O. rhinotracheale'ye karşı oluşmuş antikorların varlığı ELISA testi ile belirlendi.Bulgular: Toplam 650 kan serum örneğinden 113 (%17.4)'ünde O. rhinotracheale antikoru tespit edildi. Bu 113 pozitif serum örneği örnekleme yapılan 26 kümesin 12 (%46.2)'sinden toplanmıştı. Enfekte 12 kümes, Konya, Gaziantep, Ankara ve Karaman illerindeki 12 farklı çiftliğe aitti. Öneriler: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları göstermiştir ki, Türkiye'deki ticari yumurtacı tavuk kümeslerinde O. rhinotracheale enfeksiyonu yüksek bir prevalansa sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANİOGLU, G., ARAS, Z., SAYİN, Z. (2022). Ticari yumurtacı tavuklarda Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale enfeksiyonunun serolojik prevalansı. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 22–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/509954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Allymehr M, 2006. Seroprevalence of Ornithobacterium rhi- notracheale infection in broiler and broiler breeder chic- kens in West Azarbaijan Province, Iran. J Vet Med Series A, 3, 40-42.
  2. Back A, Halvorson D, Rajashekara G, Nagaraja KV, 1998. De- velopment of a serum plate agglutination test to detect antibodies to Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale. J Vet Diagn Invest, 10, 84-86.
  3. Banani M, Momayez R, Pourbakhsh SA, Goodarzi H, Bahmani- nejad MA, 2002. Simultaneous isolation of O. rhinotrachea- le and avian influenza virus subtype H9N2 from commerci- al poultry chickens. Iran J Vet Res, 6, 190-195.
  4. Chansiripornchai N, Wanasawaeng W, Sasipreeyajan J, 2007. Seroprevalence and identification of Ornithobacterium rhi- notracheale from broiler and broiler breeder flocks in Tha- iland. Avian Dis, 51, 777-780.
  5. Charlton B, Channing-Santiago S, Bickford A, Cardona C, Chin R, Cooper G, Droul R, Jeffrey J, Meteyer H, Shivaprasad H, Walker R, 1993. Preliminary characterization of a pleo- morphic Gramnegative rod associated with avian respira- tory disease. J Vet Diagn Invest, 5, 47-51.
  6. Chin RP, Droual R, 1997. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in- fection. In: Diseases of Poultry, Eds: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, McDougald LR and Saif YM, 10th edition, Iowa State University Press,
  7. Iowa, USA, pp: 1012-1015.
  8. Dudouyt J, Leorat J, Van Empel P, Gardin Y, Celine D, 1995. Iso- lement d'un novel pathogene chez la dinde: Ornithobacte- rium rhinotracheale: Conduit a tenir. In: Proceedings of the Journees de la Recherche Avicole, Angers, France, 28-30 March 1995, 240-243.
  9. Erganiş O, Hadimli HH, Kav K, Çorlu M, Öztürk D, 2002. A comparative study on detection of Ornithobacterium rhi- notracheale antibodies in meat-type turkeys by dot immu- nobinding assay, rapid agglutination test and serum agglu- tination test. Avian Pathol, 31, 201-204.
  10. Erganiş O, Hadimli HH, Kav K, Sayın Z, 2013. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of strains of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolated from poultry in Turkey. Afr J Micro- biol Res, 7, 82-88.
  11. Eröksüz H, Özbey G, Çevik A, Gencer B, Tarakci B, Balik DT, 2006.
  12. Immuno-histochemical, Pathological, Enzyme Lin- ked Immunosorbent Assay and Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Experimental Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale Infection in Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Rev Med Vet, 157, 197-202. Hafez HM, 1998. Current status on the Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) infection in poultry. Berl Munch Ti- erarztl Wocchenschr, 111, 143-145. Hafez H