AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightWhen TTTCB and TTFNA were performed consecutively in the same procedure, theoverall diagnostic accuracy was 93.7%.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US) guided transthoracic fine needleaspiration biopsy (TTFNA) and US guided transthoracic tru-cut biopsy (TTTCB) in malignant thoraxlesions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent US guided transthoracic biopsies betweenApril 2014 and May 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who were diagnosed as thoracicmalignancy and both TTTCB and TTFNA performed for the same lesion were included in the study.The diagnostic accuracy of TTTCB, TTFNA and their combination were analyzed. The diagnosticaccurracy of methods were statistically compared by McNemar Test.RESULTS: Thirty two patients were included in the study. Ultrasound guided TTFNA and/or TTTCBwere diagnostic in 30 (93.8%) of them. TTFNA was diagnostic in 23 (%71.8), TTTCB were diagnosticin 26 (%81.2) of these pateints. Seven (77.7%) of 9 patients in which TTFNA was not diagnostic,TTTCB was diagnostic. The diagnostic accuracy was 71.8% and 81.2% for TTFNA and TTTCB,respectively. When TTTCB and TTFNA were performed consecutively in the same procedure, theoverall diagnostic accuracy was 93.7%. There was no difference between the diagnostic accuracyof US-guided TTFNA and TTTCB (P=0.508). The diagnostic accuracy of combination of TTFNAand TTTCB was significantly higher than that of TTFNA alone (P=0.016). During the procedures,pneumothorax which did not require chest tube insertion was detected as complication in 1 case(3.1%).CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of US-guided TTFNA and TTTCB is high and has no superiorityto each other. Combining both procedures under the quidence of US increases the diagnosticaccuracy statistically significantly.