Journals / Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology / 2018 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer surgery: Is proportion of emphysema important?

Pages
7–11
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The average drainage time waslonger for higher GdCS scores, and the rate of exposition to a pulmonary complication was higherin the patients with increased GdCS.CONCLUSION: In view of these findings, Goddard’s scoring for chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease‑emphysema patients was considered likely to be an indicative parameter in the preoperativeevaluation and postoperative follow‑up of thoracic surgery patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Preoperative evaluation in thoracic surgery is highly important to determinesurgical suitability, estimate postoperative pulmonary complications, and for patient follow‑up.However, there is neither a definite explanation about the possible complications nor a goldstandard method.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 297 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection forprimary lung carcinoma were retrospectively evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To form a homogeneous group, all factorsthat increase the rate of pulmonary complication were excluded except emphysema.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The average drainage time waslonger for higher GdCS scores, and the rate of exposition to a pulmonary complication was higherin the patients with increased GdCS.CONCLUSION: In view of these findings, Goddard’s scoring for chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease‑emphysema patients was considered likely to be an indicative parameter in the preoperativeevaluation and postoperative follow‑up of thoracic surgery patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative evaluation in thoracic surgery is highly important to determinesurgical suitability, estimate postoperative pulmonary complications, and for patient follow‑up.However, there is neither a definite explanation about the possible complications nor a goldstandard method.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 297 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection forprimary lung carcinoma were retrospectively evaluated. To form a homogeneous group, all factorsthat increase the rate of pulmonary complication were excluded except emphysema. Patients whodid not meet these criteria were removed from the study. The study continued with 104 other patients.This patient subgroup was divided into groups according to Goddard Classification– Score (GdCS).The correlation between GdCS and other variables was statistically investigated.RESULTS: According to the GdCS of 104 patients, the patient distribution was as follows:10 patients (9.6%) were G0, 28 patients (26.9%) were G1, 42 patients (40.4%) were G2,22 patients (21.2%) were G3, and 2 patients (1.9%) were G4. Thirty‑five (33.6%) of 104 patientshad a pulmonary complication during the postoperative follow‑up. The average drainage time waslonger for higher GdCS scores, and the rate of exposition to a pulmonary complication was higherin the patients with increased GdCS.CONCLUSION: In view of these findings, Goddard’s scoring for chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease‑emphysema patients was considered likely to be an indicative parameter in the preoperativeevaluation and postoperative follow‑up of thoracic surgery patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

Susam, S., Akcay, O., Sevinc, S., Ceylan, K. C., Samancilar, O., Akcam, T. I., Kaya, S. O. (2022). Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer surgery: Is proportion of emphysema important?. Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 7–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/509690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT; American College of Chest Physicians. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced‑based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007;132:161S‑77S. 2. van Tilburg PM, Stam H, Hoogsteden HC, van Klaveren RJ. Pre‑operative pulmonary evaluation of lung cancer patients: A review of the literature. Eur Respir J 2009;33:1206‑15
  2. Ludwig C, Stoelben E, Olschewski M, Hasse J. Comparison of morbidity, 30‑day mortality, and long‑term survival after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy for non‑small cell lung carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:968‑73
  3. British Thoracic Society, Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Working Party. BTS guidelines: Guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. Thorax 2001;56:89‑108
  4. Datta D, Lahiri B. Preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing lung resection surgery. Chest 2003;123:2096‑103
  5. Brunelli A, Refai M, Xiumé F, Salati M, Sciarra V, Socci L, et al. Performance at symptom‑limited stair‑climbing test is associated with increased cardiopulmonary complications, mortality, and costs after major lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:240‑7
  6. Charloux A, Brunelli A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier JP, Varela G, et al. Lung function evaluation before surgery in lung cancer patients: How are recent advances put into practice? A survey among members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) and of the Thoracic Oncology Section of the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:925‑31
  7. Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier JP, Varela G, et al. The European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical guidelines for evaluating fitness for radical treatment (surgery and chemoradiotherapy) in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:181‑4
  8. Bobbio A, Chetta A, Carbognani P, Internullo E, Verduri A, Sansebastiano G, et al. Changes in pulmonary function test and cardio‑pulmonary exercise capacity in COPD patients after lobar pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:754‑8
  9. Goddard PR, Nicholson EM, Laszlo G, Watt I. Computed tomography in pulmonary emphysema. Clin Radiol 1982;33:379‑87
  10. Sevinc S, Kaya SO, Akcam TI, Ceylan KC, Ozturk O, Susam S, et al. Prolonged air leakage in secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: Is proporti