Journals / Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Assesment of symptom burden and related factors of patients with lung cancer in a palliative care unit

Pages
93–96
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall survival and meanESAS score were not related (P > 0.05).CONCLUSION: ESAS contributes significantly to improve general medical condition of patients withlung cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Symptom palliation is important in terms of improving quality of life andtherapy compliance in patients diagnosed with lung cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mean sleepvariance score was significantly higher in Stage IV patients compared to all other groups (P = 0.038).The scores of cough and how they felt themselves were significantly higher in patients withmetastatic lymph node (n = 30; P = 0.016 and P = 0.027, respectively).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall survival and meanESAS score were not related (P > 0.05).CONCLUSION: ESAS contributes significantly to improve general medical condition of patients withlung cancer.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Symptom palliation is important in terms of improving quality of life andtherapy compliance in patients diagnosed with lung cancer. In this study, we intend to describe thetumor symptoms and related factors with Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) in patientswho admitted to a palliative care unit.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and ninety patients with lung cancer who admitted toour tertiary outpatient palliative clinic were retrospectively reviewed. Pathological diagnosis, stage,demographic features, comorbidities, treatment modalities, and ESAS score were recorded. Survivalwas analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analysis.RESULTS: There was no relation between stage of disease and ESAS score. The mean sleepvariance score was significantly higher in Stage IV patients compared to all other groups (P = 0.038).The scores of cough and how they felt themselves were significantly higher in patients withmetastatic lymph node (n = 30; P = 0.016 and P = 0.027, respectively). The presence of diabetesmellitus was found to be significantly related to higher sadness and anxiety score (P = 0.046 andP = 0.023, respectively). Treatment modalities (Group 1: best supportive care [n = 22] and Group 2:others [n = 268]) did not affect the mean ESAS score (P > 0.05). The overall survival and meanESAS score were not related (P > 0.05).CONCLUSION: ESAS contributes significantly to improve general medical condition of patients withlung cancer. Comorbidities should be considered along with ESAS during cancer management.Symptom score evaluation and proper palliative treatment is important in lung cancer patients.Anyway, the treatment period of lung cancer is already difficult enough, so physicians should facilitatethis process for patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, Ü., KIZILGÖZ, D., KABALAK, P. A., YEŞİLDAĞLI, H., CENGİZ, T. İ. (2022). Assesment of symptom burden and related factors of patients with lung cancer in a palliative care unit. Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 93–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/509646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Henoch I, Lövgren M. The influence of symptom clusters and the most distressing concerns regarding quality of life among patients with inoperable lung cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014;18:236‑41
  2. Liao YC, Shun SC, Liao WY, Yu CJ, Yang PC, Lai YH, et al. Quality of life and related factors in patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer: A longitudinal study. Oncol Nurs Forum 2014;41:E44‑55
  3. Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M. Validation of the edmonton symptom assessment scale. Cancer 2000;88:2164‑71
  4. Cheifetz O, Packham TL, Macdermid JC. Rasch analysis of the edmonton symptom assessment system and research implications. Curr Oncol 2014;21:e186‑94
  5. Barbera L, Seow H, Howell D, Sutradhar R, Earle C, Liu Y, et al. Symptom burden and performance status in a population‑based cohort of ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 2010;116:5767‑76
  6. Cheung WY, Barmala N, Zarinehbaf S, Rodin G, Le LW, Zimmermann C, et al. The association of physical and psychological symptom burden with time to death among palliative cancer outpatients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;37:297‑304
  7. Oldenmenger WH, de Raaf PJ, de Klerk C, van der Rijt CC. Cut points on 0‑10 numeric rating scales for symptoms included in the edmonton symptom assessment scale in cancer patients: A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013;45:1083‑93
  8. Alshemmari S, Ezzat H, Samir Z, Sajnani K, Alsirafy S. Symptom burden in hospitalized patients with cancer in Kuwait and the need for palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2010;27:446‑9
  9. Gupta M, Sahi MS, Bhargava AK, Talwar V. A prospective evaluation of symptom prevalence and overall symptom burden among cohort of critically ill cancer patients. Indian J Palliat Care 2016;22:118‑24
  10. Hua MS, Li G, Blinderman CD, Wunsch H. Estimates of the need for palliative care consultation across United States İntensive Care Units using a trigger‑based model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;189:428‑36
  11. Wang XS, Shi Q, Lu C, Basch EM, Johnson VE, Mendoza TR, et al. Prognostic value of symptom burden for overall survival in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 2010;116:137‑45
  12. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non‑small‑cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:733‑42
  13. Ovayolu N, Ovayolu Ö, Serçe S, Tuna D, Pirbudak Çöçelli L, Sevinç A, et al. Pain and quality of life in Turkish cancer patients. Nurs Health S