Journals / Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

The value of preoperative pulmonary assessment in predicting postoperative pulmonary complications

Pages
29–37
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These parameters should be examined carefully in the preoperativeperiod and should be careful in terms of pulmonary complications that may develop during thepostoperative period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the preoperative parameters that may predict postoperativepulmonary complications (POPCs) and the value of some current practical indexes in predictingPOPCs.MATERIALS and METHODS: Our study is a retrospective cohort study carried out in 9 differentcenters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients admitted to the chest diseases outpatient clinic for preoperative evaluation werefollowed up during the 6‑month study period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These parameters should be examined carefully in the preoperativeperiod and should be careful in terms of pulmonary complications that may develop during thepostoperative period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the preoperative parameters that may predict postoperativepulmonary complications (POPCs) and the value of some current practical indexes in predictingPOPCs.MATERIALS and METHODS: Our study is a retrospective cohort study carried out in 9 differentcenters. Patients admitted to the chest diseases outpatient clinic for preoperative evaluation werefollowed up during the 6‑month study period. Patients with or without postoperative complicationswere evaluated retrospectively, and the effect of some parameters and indexes recorded duringthe preoperative evaluation of chest diseases on POPC development was investigated statistically.RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were included in the study. POPCs were observed in100 patients (32.6%). About 13% of these complications were respiratory tract infections, 59%were respiratory failure, 45% were pleural effusion, and 42% were atelectasis, which were the mostcommon pulmonary complications. The probability of experiencing POPCs by patients with chronicobstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is 2.5 (1.18–5.67) times more than those without COPD. Wedetermined that patients with the history of upper respiratory tract infection during the preoperativeperiod are 5.3 times more likely to have POPCs; similarly, the number was 4.7 for patients undergoingcardiac operation and 3.3 for patients with interstitial infiltration.CONCLUSION: The risk of pulmonary complications was higher for those with the history of upperrespiratory tract infection during the preoperative period, those undergoing cardiac surgery, thosewith the shortness of breath, those with the history of COPD, and those with the reticular/interstitialinfiltrations in the chest X‑ray. These parameters should be examined carefully in the preoperativeperiod and should be careful in terms of pulmonary complications that may develop during thepostoperative period.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIOĞLU, N., OGAN, N., FAZLIOĞLU, N., TANRIVERDİ, H., ŞENGÜL, A., YILMAZ, N., DİKEN, Ö. E., DEMİR, E., TURNA, A., MİRİCİ, A. (2022). The value of preoperative pulmonary assessment in predicting postoperative pulmonary complications. Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 29–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/509632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Vallès J, Castillo J, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population‑based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology 2010;113:1338‑50
  2. Mazo V, Sabaté S, Canet J, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, et al. Prospective external validation of a predictive score for postoperative pulmonary complications. Anesthesiology 2014;121:219‑31
  3. Lawrence VA, Hilsenbeck SG, Mulrow CD, Dhanda R, Sapp J, Page CP. Incidence and hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10:671‑8
  4. Bapoje SR, Whitaker JF, Schulz T, Chu ES, Albert RK. Preoperative evaluation of the patient with pulmonary disease. Chest 2007;132:1637‑45
  5. Fisher BW, Majumdar SR, McAlister FA. Predicting pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery: A systematic review of blinded studies. Am J Med 2002;112:219‑25
  6. Saraçoğlu A, Yavru A, Küçükgöncü S, Tüzüner F, Karadeniz M, Başaran B, et al. Predictive factors involved in development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2014;42:313‑9
  7. Canet J, Sabaté S, Mazo V, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, et al. Development and validation of a score to predict postoperative respiratory failure in a multicentre European cohort: A prospective, observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015;32:458‑70
  8. Gupta H, Gupta PK, Fang X, Miller WJ, Cemaj S, Forse RA, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator predicting postoperative respiratory failure. Chest 2011;140:1207‑15
  9. Johnson RG, Arozullah AM, Neumayer L, Henderson WG, Hosokawa P, Khuri SF. Multivariable predictors of postoperative respiratory failure after general and vascular surgery: Results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:1188‑98
  10. Staehr‑Rye AK, Eikermann M. Eliminate postoperative respiratory complications: Preoperative screening opens the door to clinical pathways that individualise perioperative treatment. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015;32:455‑7
  11. Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Cornell JE; American College of Physicians. Preoperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: Systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:581‑95
  12. Warner MA, Divertie MB, Tinker JH. Preoperative cessation of smoking and pulmonary complications in coronary artery bypass patients. Anesthesiology 1984;60:380‑3
  13. Licker M, Schweizer A, Ellenberger C, Tschopp JM, Diaper J, Cl