Journals / Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology / 2021 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Awareness of occupational diseases among research assistants working in a medical faculty hospital: An exploratory study on a neglected area

Pages
116–121
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that there is a significant lack of knowledge on occupational disease in medical education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: Occupational diseases are conditions that are preventable and that are actually frequently encountered by physicians in daily practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive study, for which an exploratory survey was administered to 126 resident physicians in a medical faculty hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that there is a significant lack of knowledge on occupational disease in medical education.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Occupational diseases are conditions that are preventable and that are actually frequently encountered by physicians in daily practice. The present study, involving research assistants working in a medical faculty hospital clinic where there is the potential to diagnose occupational disease measures, aimed to analyze their level of awareness of the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of occupational diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive study, for which an exploratory survey was administered to 126 resident physicians in a medical faculty hospital. The survey items were related to the physicians’ knowledge of the definition of “occupational disease,” whether they took work and occupational history in daily practice, the status of diagnosis of occupational diseases in their own fields of specialization and the procedure followed in the event of a diagnosis, and their opinions of the significance of diagnosing occupational diseases. RESULTS: Among the participants, 77 (62.1%) were found to ask the patients about their occupation, with the reasons given for not doing so being stated as patient load and busy schedule by 16 (12.9%) and limited time by 9 (3%) of the participants. Approximately 60% of the participants were able to define the term “occupational disease,” however, only 37.9% were aware of the laws on occupational health and safety. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that there is a significant lack of knowledge on occupational disease in medical education. As such, education should be provided during both medical school and specialization training regarding the duties, powers, and responsibilities of physicians related to occupational diseases

🔖

Cite This Article

Çimrin, A. H., Alici, N. Ş., Suzer, B., Ecemis, M. U., Kasabali, G., Sanli, S., Kuzgun, O., Nakipoglu, A. B. (2022). Awareness of occupational diseases among research assistants working in a medical faculty hospital: An exploratory study on a neglected area. Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 116–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/509545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Social Insurances and General Health Insurance Law No. 5510. Available from: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/Kanunlar.aspx. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 21]
  2. Occupational Health and Safety Law No. 6331. Available from: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/Kanunlar.aspx. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 21]
  3. Social security institutions of the republic of turkey statistical annuals 2019. Available from: http://www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/ portal/sgk/tr/kurumsal/istatistik/sgk_istatistik_yilliklari. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 06]
  4. Gardiner K, Harrington JM. Occupational Diseases. In Occupational Health Pocket Consultant (Pocket Consultant Series). 5th ed. USA: Blackwell Publishing; 2007
  5. List of Occupational Diseases (revised 2010). Identification and Recognition of Occupational Diseases: Criteria for Incorporating Diseases in the ILO List of Occupational Diseases 2017;15:58. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/safework/info/ publications/WCMS_150323/la. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 21]
  6. Cimrin AH, Sevinc C, Kundak I, Ellidokuz H, Itil O. Attitudes of medical faculty physicians about taking occupational history. Med Educ 1999;33:466‑7
  7. Thompson JN, Brodkin CA, Kyes K, Neighbor W, Evanoff B. Use of a questionnaire to improve occupational and environmental history taking in primary care physicians. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42:1188‑94
  8. Çımrın A, Albayrak S, Tabak L. Burden of occupational health issues in medical education in Turkey (in Turkish). Tuberculosis and Thorax 2010;58:142‑6
  9. Rest KM, Cordes DH, Hake JC. Teaching occupational health to medical students. J Fam Pract 1983;16:979‑83
  10. Politi BJ, Arena VC, Schwerha J, Sussman N. Occupational medical history taking: How are today’s physicians doing? A cross‑sectional investigation of the frequency of occupational history taking by physicians in a major US teaching center. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:550‑5
  11. Republic of turkey health statistics annual 2018. Available from: https://dosyasb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/36134, siy2018trpdf. pdf? [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 06]
  12. Turkish Health Union Number of Patients Per Doctor. Available from: https://www.turksagliksen.org. tr/1‑doktor‑basina‑dusen‑hasta‑sayisi‑5635_3069.html. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 06]
  13. Republic of turkey health statistics annual 2017. Available from: https://ohsad.org/wp‑content/ uploads/2018/12/28310saglik‑istatistikleri‑yilligi‑2017pdf. pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 06]
  14. Turkish Medical Association. TTB 2014‑16 Annual Work Report