Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Physical Therapy on Pain, Functional Status, Sagittal Spinal Alignment, and Spinal Mobility in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Pages
22–26
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, significant improvements in ODI, mLST, and all inclinometric evaluations in terms of sagittal spinal alignment and spinal mobility were noted only in the study group compared with baseline values (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the effects of physical therapy (PT) on pain, functional status, sagittal spinal alignment, and spinal mobility in chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 100 patients with chronic NSLBP.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group comprised 60 patients to whom a PT program including superficial heat, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and ultrasound for 10 sessions was assigned.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, significant improvements in ODI, mLST, and all inclinometric evaluations in terms of sagittal spinal alignment and spinal mobility were noted only in the study group compared with baseline values (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of physical therapy (PT) on pain, functional status, sagittal spinal alignment, and spinal mobility in chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 100 patients with chronic NSLBP. The study group comprised 60 patients to whom a PT program including superficial heat, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and ultrasound for 10 sessions was assigned. The control group was composed of 40 patients who received no PT. Home exercise programs were applied to both groups. Pain severity was determined using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional status was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Spinal sagittal alignment in regard to lumbosacral, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis angles and spinal mobility regarding lumbar and thoracic flexion and extension degrees were assessed using a digital inclinometer. Lumbar flexion was also assessed using the modified lumbar Schober test (mLST). Evaluations were performed at baseline and after completing the therapy sessions.Results: There were significant decreases in VAS scores in each group upon therapy completion. However, significant improvements in ODI, mLST, and all inclinometric evaluations in terms of sagittal spinal alignment and spinal mobility were noted only in the study group compared with baseline values (p

🔖

Cite This Article

FIRAT, S. C., FİLİZ, M. B. (2022). Effects of Physical Therapy on Pain, Functional Status, Sagittal Spinal Alignment, and Spinal Mobility in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 22–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/509377

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Gilgil E, Kaçar C, Bütün B, et al. Prevalence of low back pain in a developing urban setting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1093-8. [CrossRef] 2. Magalhaes MO, Muzi LH, Comachio J, et al. The short-term effects of graded activity versus physiotherapy in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Man Ther 2015; 20: 603-9. [CrossRef] 3. Dewitte V, De Pauw R, De Meulemeester K, et al. Clinical classification criteria for nonspecific low back pain: A Delphi-survey of clinical experts. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2018; 34: 66-76. [CrossRef] 4. Manek NJ, MacGregor AJ. Epidemiology of back disorders: prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2005; 17: 134-40. 5. Koldas Dogan S, Sonel Tur B, Kurtais Y, Atay MB. Comparison of three different approaches in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Clin Rheumatol 2008; 27: 873-81. [CrossRef] 6. van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 19-39. [CrossRef] 7. Ng JK, Richardson CA, Kippers V, Parnianpour M. Comparison of lumbar range of movement and lumbar lordosis in back pain patients and matched controls. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 109-13. [CrossRef] 8. Tüzün C, Yorulmaz I, Cindaş A, Vatan S. Low back pain and posture. Clin Rheumatol 1999; 18: 308-12. [CrossRef] 9. Sorensen CJ, Norton BJ, Callaghan JP, Hwang CT, Van Dillen LR. Is lumbar lordosis related to low back pain development during prolonged standing? Man Ther 2015; 20: 553-7. 10. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 2940-52; discussion 52. 11. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 581-5; discussion 585. 12. Frost H, Lamb SE, Stewart-Brown S. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 2450-7; discussion 2458. 13. Ng JK, Kippers V, Richardson CA, Parnianpour M. Range of motion and lordosis of the lumbar spine: reliability of measurement and normative values. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 53-60. [CrossRef] 14. American Medical Association. Guidelines to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Chicago, I