Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2011 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Altı nadir safra yolları anatomik varyasyonu: karaciğer cerrahisi sonucları

Six rare biliary tract anatomic variations: implications for liver surgery

Pages
67–72
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: These newly described biliary tract variations should be recognized by liver surgeons to avoid unwanted postoperative complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The variations in the anatomy of the biliary tract need to be recognized in modern liver surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Over the previous 10 years, the anatomic variations of the bile ducts were examined during 600 intraoperative cholangiographies, 104 segmentectomies and 54 hemihepatectomies in patients with liver diseases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: These newly described biliary tract variations should be recognized by liver surgeons to avoid unwanted postoperative complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The variations in the anatomy of the biliary tract need to be recognized in modern liver surgery. The purpose of this clinical and anatomical study is to describe several novel biliary tract variations and to outline their practical importance for liver resections and transplantations. Materials and Methods: Over the previous 10 years, the anatomic variations of the bile ducts were examined during 600 intraoperative cholangiographies, 104 segmentectomies and 54 hemihepatectomies in patients with liver diseases. The intraoperative anatomies of the right and left hepatic ducts and the common hepatic duct confluence were analyzed. Results: Twenty-two variations occurred in 59.5% of the patients. Six variations were described for the first time: an accessory right hepatic duct in which a cystic duct drained; a tetrafurcation from the right anterior hepatic duct, right posterior hepatic duct and bile ducts for Segments 2 and 3 with aberrant bile drainage from Segment 4 into the bile duct for Segment 8; an aberrant bile drainage from Segments 6 and 7 into the common hepatic duct; an accessory bile duct for Segment 6 that drained into the bile duct for Segment 3; a tetrafurcation from the right anterior hepatic duct and the bile ducts for Segments 6, 3 and 2 with bile from Segment 7 draining into the bile duct for Segment 2; and an accessory bile duct for the left hemiliver that drained bile from the Type 4 small accessory hepatic lobe (according to Caygill & Gatenby) into the common hepatic duct. Conclusion: These newly described biliary tract variations should be recognized by liver surgeons to avoid unwanted postoperative complications.

Özet

Amaç: Safra yolları anatomisi içinde farklılıkların, modern karaciğer cerrahisinde tanınması gerekir. Bu klinik ve anatomik çalışmanın amacı, birkaç yeni safra yolları değişimini tanımlamak ve karaciğer rezeksiyonları ve nakli için pratik öneminin altını çizmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bundan önceki on yılda, safra kanallarının anatomik varyasyonlu karaciğer hastalığı olanlarda 600 intraoperatif kolanjiografi, 104 segmentektomi ve 54 hemihepatektomi incelendi. Sağ ve sol hepatik kanalların intraoperatif anatomileri ve ortak hepatik kanal kavşakları analiz edildi. Bulgular: Hastaların %59.5’da yirmi iki kanal varyasyonu gözlemlenmiştir. Altı varyasyon ilk kez tarif edilmiştir: bir sistik kanala drene olan bir aksesuar sağ hepatik kanal; Segment 4 anormal safra drenajı ile 2 ve 3 segmentleri için sağ anterior hepatik kanal, sağ posterior hepatik kanal ve safra yolları bir tetrafurkasyon içine segment 8 safra kanalı; segment 6 ve 7’den ortak hepatik kanal içine bir anormal safra drenajı; segment 3 safra kanalı içine drene olan segment 6 için bir aksesuar safra kanalı, sağ anterior hepatik kanal bir tetrafurkasyon ve safra segmentleri 6, 3 ve segment 2 safra kanalına drene segment 7 ile 2 safra kanalları ve sol hemiliver için bir aksesuar safra kanalına drene safra bu Tip 4 küçük aksesuar karaciğer lobu (Caygill & Gatenby’a göre) içine ortak hepatik kanal. Sonuç: Bu yeni tanımlanan safra yolları varyasyonları istenmeyen ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonları önlemek için karaciğer cerrahları tarafından göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOSTOV, D. V., KOBAKOV, G. L. (2022). Altı nadir safra yolları anatomik varyasyonu: karaciğer cerrahisi sonucları. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 67–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/509255

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Smadja C, Blumgart LH. The biliary tract and the anatomy of biliary exposure. In: Blumgart LH, ed. Surgery of the Liver and Biliary Tract. Vol. 1. 3rd Edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 2000: 19
  2. Castaing D. Surgical anatomy of the biliary tract. HPB 2008; 10: 72-6
  3. Vakili K, Pomfret E. Biliary anatomy and embryology. Surg Clin N Am 2008; 88: 1159-74
  4. Ohkubo M, Nagino M, Kamiya J, et al. Surgical anatomy of the bile ducts at the hepatic hilum as applied to living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 82-6
  5. Couinaud C. Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation. Dig Surg 1999; 16: 459-67
  6. Bismuth H. Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg 1982; 6: 3-9
  7. Radtke A, Sgourakis G, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Vascular and biliary anatomy of the right hilar window: its impact on recipient morbidity and mortality for right graft live donor liver transplantation. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1941-51
  8. Ozden I, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Uesaka K, Sano T, Nimura Y. Clinicoanatomical study on the infraportal bile ducts of segment 3. World J Surg 2002; 26: 1441-5
  9. Onishi H, Kawarada Y, Das B, et al. Surgical anatomy of the medial segment (S 4) of the liver with special reference to bile ducts and vessels. Hepatogastroenterology 2000; 47: 143-50
  10. Kostov DV, Kobakov GL. Accessory right hepatic duct in which a cystic duct drains. HPB 2011; 13: 364
  11. Kostov DV, Kobakov GL. Rare anatomical variants of bile ducts. In: Kostov DV, Kobakov GL. A Colour Atlas of Liver Resections. Marko Markov Interregional Dispensary and Hospital of Oncological Diseases of Varna, Varna, 2010; pp 107-12
  12. Caygill CP, Gatenby PA. Ectopic liver and hepatocarcinogenesis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 727-9
  13. Deshpande RR, Heaton ND, Rela M. Surgical anatomy of segmental liver transplantation. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1078-88
  14. Alibrahim E, Gibson RN, Vincent J, Speer T, Collier N, Jardine C. Spiral computed tomography-intravenous cholangiography with three-dimensional reconstructions for imaging the biliary tree. Australas Radiol 2006; 50: 136-42
  15. Choi JW, Kyoung KT, Kyoung WK, et al. Anatomic variation in intrahepatic bile ducts: an analysis of intraoperative cholangiograms in 300 consecutive donors for living donor liver transplantation. Korean J Radiol 2003; 4: 83-90
  16. Crossingham J, Jenkinsin J, Woolridge N, Gallinger S, Tait G, Moulton CA. Interpreting three-dimensional structures from two-dimensio