Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2013 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Mide kanserli vakalarda 18 F-2-deoksi-2-floro-D-glukoz pozitron emisyon tomografisinin (Fdg- Pet) preoperatif evrelemedeki rolü

The role of 2-[F-18] fluoro 2-deoxy D-glucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer

Pages
149–154
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In patients who are planned for curative surgery, FDG-PET provides better staging when used with CT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: FDG-PET can contribute significantly to the preoperativeperiod of patients with planned curative resections or with isolatedliver or lung metastasis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Separate stagings were performed according to the findings of conventional methods and PET scans, and the results were compared with the operative and histological findings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In patients who are planned for curative surgery, FDG-PET provides better staging when used with CT.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: FDG-PET can contribute significantly to the preoperativeperiod of patients with planned curative resections or with isolatedliver or lung metastasis. In this study, we analyze the importance anddiagnostic value of FDG-PET in the preoperative evaluation of gastriccancers by correlating its value with computerized tomography (CT).Materials and Methods:A prospective study was conducted. Abdominal and pelvic CTs were obtained for preoperative staging in each patient. Separate stagings were performed according to the findings of conventional methods and PET scans, and the results were compared with the operative and histological findings. Results: When the patients were evaluated according to the pathological stage, eight patients were Stage 1 (26.7%), five were Stage 2 (16.7%), eight were Stage 3 (26.7%), and nine were Stage 4 (30%). FDG-PET and CT down-staged the disease in eight (26.7%) and twelve (40%) patients, respectively. FDG-PET and CT up-staged the disease in two (6.7%) and five patients (16.7%), respectively. FDG-PET accurately staged the disease in eighteen patients (60%) (p= 0.182). Conclusion: To develop highly sensitive radioactive tests that show invasive local lymph node and peritoneal metastases, more studies in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer are needed. FDG-PET indicates a high specificity in the staging of gastric cancer. In patients who are planned for curative surgery, FDG-PET provides better staging when used with CT.

Özet

Amaç: FDG-PET izole karaciğer veya akciğer metastazlı veya küratif rezeksiyon planlanan mide kanserli vakalarda preoperatif evrelemede oldukça katkılar sağlamaktadır. Mide kanserlerinde, preoperatifuygulanan FDG-PET ve Konvansiyonel Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (CT)’nin performanslarını, operatif bulgular ve formal patoloji sonuçları ile karşılaştırmayı planladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Metodolojik çalışma disipliniyle prospektif olarak çalışma yürütülmüştür. Abdominopelvik CT ve FDG-PET preoperatif evrede tüm hastalara uygulanmıştır. Tüm bulgular Patolojik sonuçlarla kıyaslanmıştır. Bulgular: Patolojik sonuçlara göre bakıldığında; 8 (%26.7) hasta evre 1, 5 (%16.7) hasta evre 2, 8 (%26.7) hasta evre 3, 9 (%30) hasta evre 4 olarak tespit edilmiştir. FDG-PET ve Konvansiyonel CT sırasıyla 8 (%26.7) ve 20 (%40) hastada düşük evreleme, sırasıyla 2 (%6.7) ve 5 (%16.7) hastada da yüksek evreleme yapmışlardır. FDG- PET 16 (% 60) hastada evreyi doğru olarak bilmiştir (p=0.182). Sonuç: Mide kanserli hastaların preoperatif evrelemesinde, invase lenf nodu ve peritoneal metastazları gösteren, yüksek sensitif radyoaktif testlerin geliştirilmesi için daha fazla çalışmaya ihtiyaç vardır. FDG-PET mide kanseri evrelemesinde yüksek spesivite göstermiştir. Küratif cerrahi planlanan hastalarda Konvansiyonel CT ile kombine edildiğinde daha isabetli evreleme yapabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİMSEK, A., GORGULU, S., YAGCI, G., DUMAN, K., PEKER, Y. (2022). Mide kanserli vakalarda 18 F-2-deoksi-2-floro-D-glukoz pozitron emisyon tomografisinin (Fdg- Pet) preoperatif evrelemedeki rolü. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 149–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/509179

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ak I, Ciftci OD, Ustunel Z, Sivrikoz MC. Atrial angiosarcoma imaged by F-18 FDG PET/CT. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2011; 11: 14-8
  2. Sen F, Akpınar AT, et al. Radiation-Induced Lung Injury on PET/CT: Analysis of FDG Uptake Response within Specific Isodose Regions of Irradiation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2011; 31: 1218-26 3. Yapıcı O, Sahin M, Ersoy E, Semirgin, SU, Polat V. A False Positive Uptake of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose in the Liver in PET/CT Scan: Case Report. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2012; 32: 878-81 4. Adachi Y, Sakino I, Matsumata T, et al. Preoperative assessment of advanced gastric carcinoma using computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 872-5
  3. Bailey DL. Transmission scanning in emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1998; 25: 774-87
  4. Kole AC, Plukker JT, Nieweg OE, Vaalburg W. Pozitron emisyon tomography to stage oesophageal and gastroesophageal malignancy. Br J Cancer 1998; 78: 521-7
  5. Mukai K, Ishida Y, Okajima K, Isozaki H, Morimoto T, Nishiyama S. Usefulness of preoperative FDG-PET for detection of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2006; 9: 192-6
  6. Yeung HW, Macapinlac H, Karpek M, Finn RD, Larson SM. Accuracy of FDG-PET in Gastric Cancer. Preliminary Experience. Clin Positron İmaging 1998; 1: 213-21
  7. Stahl A, Ott K, Weber WA, et al. FDG-PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas. Correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 288-95
  8. Koga H, Sasaki M, Kuwabara Y, et al. An analysis of the physiological FDG uptake pattern in the stomach. Ann Nucl Med 2003; 17: 733-8
  9. Chen J, Cheong HJ, Yun MJ, et al. Improvement in preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma with positron emission tomography. Cancer 2005; 103: 2383-90
  10. Kim SK, Keon WK, Lee SJ, et al. Assessment of lymph node metastases using 18F- FDG-PET in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Molecular Imaging 2006; 33: 148-55
  11. Mochiki E, Kuwano H, Katoh H, Asao T, Oriuchi N, Endo K. Evaluation of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography for gastric cancer. World J Surg 2004; 28: 247-53
  12. Yun M, Lim SJ, Noh SH, et al. Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using 18F- FDG-PET: a comparison study with CT. The J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 1582-8
  13. Yun M, Choi HS, Yoo E, et al. The role of gastric distention in differentiating recurrent tumor from physiologic uptake in the remnant stomach on 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 9