Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2014 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Kan kültüründen soyutlanan gerçek bakteremi etkeni ve kontaminant koagulaz negatif stafilokokların slime üretimi ve metisilin direnci yönünden karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci isolated from blood cultures as a true bacteremia agent and contaminant in terms of slime production and methicillin resistance

Pages
115–119
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The slime activities of truebacteremia agents (58 CoNS strains) and contaminants (50 randomlyselected CoNS strains) were investigated by the Christensen method.The methicillin susceptibilities of the strains were determined by thedisk diffusion method.Results: Although the frequency of slime production was 39.7% among the true bacteremia CoNS agents, it was 18% in CoNS that were judged to be contaminants (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the species distribution, slime activity, and methicillin resistance of coagulase-negativestaphylococci (CoNS) isolated from blood cultures as either contaminants or true bacteremia agents.Materials and Methods: In this study, 13.268 blood culture samplessent to our laboratory from various clinics during a two-year periodwere examined in terms of the presence of CoNS to clarify whetherthe isolates are true bacteremia agents, as defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the species distribution, slime activity, and methicillin resistance of coagulase-negativestaphylococci (CoNS) isolated from blood cultures as either contaminants or true bacteremia agents.Materials and Methods: In this study, 13.268 blood culture samplessent to our laboratory from various clinics during a two-year periodwere examined in terms of the presence of CoNS to clarify whetherthe isolates are true bacteremia agents, as defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The slime activities of truebacteremia agents (58 CoNS strains) and contaminants (50 randomlyselected CoNS strains) were investigated by the Christensen method.The methicillin susceptibilities of the strains were determined by thedisk diffusion method.Results: Although the frequency of slime production was 39.7% among the true bacteremia CoNS agents, it was 18% in CoNS that were judged to be contaminants (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the species distribution, slime activity, and methicillin resistance of coagulase-negativestaphylococci (CoNS) isolated from blood cultures as either contaminants or true bacteremia agents.Materials and Methods: In this study, 13.268 blood culture samplessent to our laboratory from various clinics during a two-year periodwere examined in terms of the presence of CoNS to clarify whetherthe isolates are true bacteremia agents, as defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. The slime activities of truebacteremia agents (58 CoNS strains) and contaminants (50 randomlyselected CoNS strains) were investigated by the Christensen method.The methicillin susceptibilities of the strains were determined by thedisk diffusion method.Results: Although the frequency of slime production was 39.7% among the true bacteremia CoNS agents, it was 18% in CoNS that were judged to be contaminants (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kontaminant ve gerçek bakteremi etkeni olarak soyutlanan koagülaz negatif stafilokokların (KNS), tür düzeyinde tanımlanması, slime aktiviteleri, metisiline direnç oranlarının saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada iki yıllık süreçte çeşitli kliniklerindengönderilen 13,268 kan kültürü örneği KNS üremesi yönünden değerlendirildi. Kan kültürlerindeki üremenin gerçek bakteremi etkeni KNSolup olmadığı, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) kriterleri kullanılarak belirlendi. Gerçek bakteremi etkeni 58 KNS ve randomize seçilen 50 kontaminant KNS suşuna ait slime aktivitesi Christensen yöntemi ile araştırıldı. Bu KNS’lere ait metisilin duyarlılıkları disk difüzyon methodu uygulanarak belirlendi. Bulgular: Slime üretme oranı gerçek bakteremi etkeni olarak saptanan KNS’lerde %39,7 iken kontaminant KNS’lerde ise bu oran %18 olarak saptanmıştır (p

🔖

Cite This Article

UYANIK, M. H., AYYILDIZ, A., ERDİL, Z., YAZGI, H., OZDEN, K. (2022). Kan kültüründen soyutlanan gerçek bakteremi etkeni ve kontaminant koagulaz negatif stafilokokların slime üretimi ve metisilin direnci yönünden karşılaştırılması. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 115–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/509145

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Rogers KL, Fey PD, Rupp ME. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2009
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Kloos WE, Bannerman TL. Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 1994
  3. Kotilainen P. Association of coagulase-negative staphylococcal slime production and adherence with the development and out- come of adult septicemias. J Clin Microbiol 1990
  4. Winn W, Allen S, Janda W, et al. Gram positive cocci. Koneman’s Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
  5. pp.623-71. 5. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, et al. Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect Immun 1982
  7. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 19th Informational Supplement, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S19. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2009. 8. Verhoef J, Fluit AC, Schmitz FJ. Staphylococci and Other Micrococcaceae. In: Cohen J, Powderly WG, editors. Infectious Disease: New York NY, Elsevier, 2004.pp.2119-32. 9. Van Hal SJ, Frostis V, Miyakis S, et al. Prevalence and significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cul- tures in a tertiary hospital. Scand J Infect Dis 2008
  8. [CrossRef] 10. Kirchhoff LV, Sheagren JN. Epidemiology and clinical significance of blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphy- lococcus. Infect Control 1985
  9. Vogel L, Sloos JH, Spaargaren J, et al. Biofilm production by Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates associated with catheter related bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000
  10. [CrossRef] 12. Yazgi H, Uyanik MH, Ayyildiz A. Comparison of slime-producing coagulase-negative Staphylococcus colonization rates on vinyl and ceramic tile flooring materials. J Int Med Res 2009
  11. [CrossRef] 13. García P, Benítez R, Lam M, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylo- cocci: clinical, microbiological and molecular features to predict true bacteraemia. J Med Microbiol 2004
  12. [CrossRef] 14. Koksal F, Yasar H, Samasti M. Antibiotic resistance patterns of coag- ulase-negative s