SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2017 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2

Acil Serviste Çocuk Hastalarda Üriner Sistem Taş Tanısında Ultrason Ve Düşük Doz Bilgisayarlı Tomografinin Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Ultrasonography and Low-Dose Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Urolithiasis in the Emergency Department

Hayri OGUL
Suat EREN
Recep SADE
Akin LEVENT
Mecit KANTARCİ
Pages
128–131
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The presence of urolithiasis, anatomical location of urolithiasis, and measurements of renal stones were evaluated and recorded.Results: There were statistically significant differences between US and standard-dose CT (SDCT) with respect to the diagnosis of urolithiasis, anatomical location of urolithiasis, and measurements of renal stones (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to compare ultrasonography (US) and low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for diagnosing pediatric urolithiasis in the emergency department.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was waived.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From March 2016 to March 2017, 100 consecutive patients met the selection criteria and were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The presence of urolithiasis, anatomical location of urolithiasis, and measurements of renal stones were evaluated and recorded.Results: There were statistically significant differences between US and standard-dose CT (SDCT) with respect to the diagnosis of urolithiasis, anatomical location of urolithiasis, and measurements of renal stones (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare ultrasonography (US) and low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for diagnosing pediatric urolithiasis in the emergency department.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was waived. From March 2016 to March 2017, 100 consecutive patients met the selection criteria and were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly selected in a 1:1 ratio and were allocated to one of the following two imaging groups: US or abdominal LDCT. LDCT examinations were performed using a 320-detector row CT. Radiation dose analysis was performed using Radimetrics. US examinations were performed using the Aplio 500 ultrasound system. The presence of urolithiasis, anatomical location of urolithiasis, and measurements of renal stones were evaluated and recorded.Results: There were statistically significant differences between US and standard-dose CT (SDCT) with respect to the diagnosis of urolithiasis, anatomical location of urolithiasis, and measurements of renal stones (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmamızda acil serviste çocuk hastalarda üriner sistem taş tanısında ultrason (US) ve düşük doz bilgisayarlı tomografinin (DDBT) karşılaştırılması.Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2016 Mart ve 2017 Mart tarihleri arasında toplam 100 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar 1e 1e oranında US ve DDBT grubuna seçildi. BT incelemeleri 320 kesitli BT cihazı ile gerçekleştirildir. Radyasyon dozları Radimetrics programı kullanılarak hesaplandı. US incelemeleri Aplio 500 cihazında gerçekleştirildi. Taş varlığı, taş lokalizasyonu ve taş boyutları ölçüldü.Bulgular: Taş varlığı, taş lokalizasyonu ve taş boyutlarında US ve standard dose BT (SBT) arasında istatistiksel fark vardı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

OGUL, H., EREN, S., SADE, R., LEVENT, A., KANTARCİ, M. (2022). Acil Serviste Çocuk Hastalarda Üriner Sistem Taş Tanısında Ultrason Ve Düşük Doz Bilgisayarlı Tomografinin Karşılaştırılması. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2, 128–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/509020

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Van Batavia JP, Tasian GE. Clinical effectiveness in the diagnosis and acute management of pediatric nephrolithiasis. Int J Surg 2016; 36: 698-704
  2. Colleran GC, Callahan MJ, Paltiel HJ, et al. Imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis. Pediatr Radiol 2017; 47: 5-16
  3. Smith-Bindman R, Aubin C, Bailitz J, et al. Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1100-10
  4. Karaca L, Yuceler Z, Kantarci M, et al. The feasibility of dual-energy CT in differentiation of vertebral compression fractures. Br J Radiol 2016; 89: 20150300
  5. Sade R, Kantarci M, Ogul H, et al. The feasibility of dual-energy computed tomography in cardiac contusion imaging for mildest blunt cardiac injury. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016 Nov 7. [Epub ahead of print]
  6. Pirimoglu B, Sade R, Ogul H, Kantarci M, Eren S, Levent A. How can new imaging modalities help in the practice of radiology? Eurasian J Med 2016; 48: 213-221
  7. Noone TC, Hosey J, Firat Z, Semelka RC. Imaging and localization of islet-cell tumours of the pancreas on CT and MRI. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 19: 195-211
  8. Malkawi IM, Han E, Atalla CS, Santucci RA, O’Neil B, Wynberg JB. Low-dose (10%) computed tomography may be inferior to standard-dose CT in the evaluation of acute renal colic in the emergency room setting. J Endourol 2016; 30: 493-6
  9. Sohn W, Clayman RV, Lee JY, Cohen A, Mucksavage P. Low-dose and standard computed tomography scans yield equivalent stone measurements. Urology 2013; 81: 231-4
  10. Xiang H, Chan M, Brown V, Huo YR, Chan L, Ridley L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017 Jan 31. doi: 10.1111/1754- 9485.12587. [Epub ahead of print]
  11. Zhang GM, Shi B, Sun H, et al. High-pitch low-dose abdominopelvic CT with tin-filtration technique for detecting urinary stones. Abdom Radiol 2017 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/ s00261-017-1103-x. [Epub ahead of print]
  12. Passerotti C, Chow JS, Silva A, et al. Ultrasound versus computerized tomography for evaluating urolithiasis. J Urol 2009; 182: 1829-34.