Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3

Which Surgical Method is Superior for the Treatment of Parotid Tumor? Is it Classical? Is it New?

Pages
273–276
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In short, we advocate to classical methods for the parotid tumor surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to compare the incidence of parotid tumors seen in our region in the last ten years with the literature values and to compare the recently proposed new parotidectomy methods with classical parotidectomy methods which we applied for ten years.Materials and Methods: 37 females and 36 males total 73 patients who made parotidectomy between 2008 and 2018 were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Histopathological results and the results of surgical methods applied were compared with literature.Results: The mean age of the 73 patients underwent parotidectomy was 54±34.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In short, we advocate to classical methods for the parotid tumor surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare the incidence of parotid tumors seen in our region in the last ten years with the literature values and to compare the recently proposed new parotidectomy methods with classical parotidectomy methods which we applied for ten years.Materials and Methods: 37 females and 36 males total 73 patients who made parotidectomy between 2008 and 2018 were included in the study. The patients age, sex, histopathological diagnosis, surgical methods applied to malignant or benign tumors and side of the disease were recorded. Histopathological results and the results of surgical methods applied were compared with literature.Results: The mean age of the 73 patients underwent parotidectomy was 54±34. Of the cases, 57 (78%) cases were benign and 16 (22%) were malignant. Histopathologically benign masses were found 3.5 time more common than malignant masses. The sides of diseases were observed at the near rates (right, left; 52%, 48%, respectively). The most often detected benign neoplasm was pleomorphic adenoma with 42 (74%) cases. The most often detected malignant neoplasm was mucoepidermoid carcinoma with 6 (43%) cases. As surgical method, superficial parotidectomy was applied to 64 (88%) patients, total parotidectomy to 9 (12%) patients and the neck dissection to 7 (10%) patients.Conclusion: We recommend that to be applied the superficial parotidectomy as the smallest procedure to be performed in the surgery of parotid tumors and to be avoided from partial superficial parotidectomies. In short, we advocate to classical methods for the parotid tumor surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUTLU, V., KAYA, Z. (2022). Which Surgical Method is Superior for the Treatment of Parotid Tumor? Is it Classical? Is it New?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3, 273–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/508949

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Chan WH, Lee KW, Chiang FY, et al. Features of parotid gland diseases and surgical results in Southern Taiwan. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2010
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Ho K, Lin H, Ann DK, Chu PG, Yen Y. An overview of the rare parotid gland cancer. Head Neck Oncol 2011
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Arshad AR. Parotid swellings: report of 110 consecutive cases. Med J Malaysia 1998
  4. Bussu F, Parrilla C, Rizzo D, Almadori G, Paludetti G, Galli J. Clinical approach and treatment of benign and malignant parotid masses, personal experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2011
  5. Supriya M, Denholm S, Palmer T. Seeding of tumor cells after fine needle aspiration cytology in benign parotid tumor: a case report and literature review. Laryngoscope 2008
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Bilici S, Akpınar ME, Yiğit Ö, Dönmez Z. The Clinical Management of the Parotid Masses: A Five Year Study Parotis. Istanbul Med J 2012
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Quer M, Guntinas-Lichius O, Marchal F, et al. Classification of parotidectomies: a proposal of the European Salivary Gland Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Junior AT, Almeida OP, Kowalski LP. Parotid neoplasms: analysis of 600 patients attended at a single institution. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Tas A, Giran S, Yagız R, et al. Evaluation of surgical and histopathologic results of patients operated for parotid gland tumor. Balkan Medical Journal 2009
  10. Al Salamah SM, Khalid K, Khan IAR, Gul R. Outcome of surgery for parotid tumours: 5- Year experience of a general surgical unit in a teaching hospital. ANZ J Surg 2005
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Kılıckesmez O, Aydın S, Cimilli T. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors: is it a useful technique? Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2010
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Zbaren P, Schupbach J, Nuyens M, et al. Carcinoma of the parotid gland. Am J Surg 2003
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Bansal A, Kaur M, Dalal V, Siraj F. Papillary pattern in acinic cell carcinoma of parotid gland: A potential diagnostic pitfall on FNAC. J Cytol 2018
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Khelfa Y, Mansour M, Abdel-Aziz Y, Raufi A, Denning K, Lebowicz Y. Relapsed acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland with diffuse distant metastasis: Case report with literature review. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 2016
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Laskawi R, Schott T, Mir