Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of VATS and Thoracotomy Results in Mediastinal Neurogenic Tumors

Pages
214–219
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With increasing experience, resection can be performed thoracoscopically in most cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the results of patients who underwent surgery by thoracotomy and Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in mediastinal neurogenic tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Twenty-six consecutive cases (12 males and 14 females; mean age 39.4 ± 22.3 years; range 1–72 years) who were histopathologically diagnosed as having mediastinal neurogenic tumors between January 2000 and August 2020 were included in a single-center, retrospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With increasing experience, resection can be performed thoracoscopically in most cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the results of patients who underwent surgery by thoracotomy and Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in mediastinal neurogenic tumors. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six consecutive cases (12 males and 14 females; mean age 39.4 ± 22.3 years; range 1–72 years) who were histopathologically diagnosed as having mediastinal neurogenic tumors between January 2000 and August 2020 were included in a single-center, retrospective study. Results: There were 5 (19.2%) children and 21 (80.8%) adults. Lesions in all cases were located in the posterior mediastinum. Schwannoma was detected histopathologically in 18 cases (69.2%), and all of these cases were adult patients. Resection was performed by thoracotomy in 14 cases (7 right and 7 left) and 12 cases by thoracoscopy (7 right and 5 left). The mean tumor size was 7.4 ± 1.9 cm (range 5–12 cm) in the thoracotomy group and 4.3 ± 1.9 cm (range 2–7 cm) in the VATS group (P = .001). Mean operative time was 101.7 ± 27.8 min (range 70–150 min) in the thoracotomy group and 77.9 ± 24.3 min (range 60–150 min) in the VATS group (P = .014). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.4 ± 4.0 days (range 3–20 days) in the thoracotomy group and 4.7 ± 1.7 days (range 2–7 days) in the VATS group (P = .040). Conclusion: Most of the mediastinal neurogenic tumors are benign and surgical resection is required in their treatment. With increasing experience, resection can be performed thoracoscopically in most cases.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDOĞDU, B., ULAŞ, A. B., AYDIN, Y., EROĞLU, A. (2022). Comparison of VATS and Thoracotomy Results in Mediastinal Neurogenic Tumors. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3, 214–219. https://ajindex.com/articles/508837

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Rodriguez EF, Jones R, Miller D, Rodriguez FJ. Neurogenic tumors of the mediastinum. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2020
  2. 37(4):179-186. https://10. 1053/j.semdp.2020.04.004 2. Mlika M, Marghli A, Souilem I, et al. A single-institution experience of neurogenic tumors of the mediastinum. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2019
  3. 27(8):661-669. [Crossref] 3. Lochowski MP, Brzeziński D, Kozak J. Videothoracoscopy in the treatment of benign neurogenic tumours of the posterior mediastinum. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014
  4. 9(3):315-318. [Crossref] 4. Fraga JC, Rothenberg S, Kiely E, Pierro A. Videoassisted thoracic surgery resection for pediatric mediastinal neurogenic tumors. J Pediatr Surg. 2012
  5. 47(7):1349-1353. [Crossref] 5. Chen X, Ma Q, Wang S, Zhang H, Huang D. Surgical treatment of posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2019
  6. 119(6):807- 813. [Crossref] 6. Takeda S, Miyoshi S, Minami M, Matsuda H. Intrathoracic neurogenic tumors–50 years’ experience in a Japanese institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004
  7. 26(4):807-812. [Crossref] 7. Yamaguchi M, Yoshino I, Fukuyama S, et al. Surgical treatment of neurogenic tumors of the chest. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004
  8. 10 (3):148-151. 8. Ratbi MB, El Oueriachi F, Arsalane A, El Hammoumi MM, Kabiri El H. Surgery of benign neurogenic tumors in adults: Single institution experience. Pan Afr Med J. 2014
  9. [Crossref] 9. Pavlus JD, Carter BW, Tolley MD, Keung ES, Khorashadi L, Lichtenberger JP. 3rd. Imaging of Thoracic Neurogenic Tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016
  10. 207(3):552-561. [Crossref] 10. Ciriaco P, Negri G, Bandiera A, et al. Videothoracoscopic resection of benign neurogenic tumors of the posterior mediastinum. Innovations (Phila). 2006
  11. 1(6):332-334. [Crossref] 11. Tatci E, Ozmen O, Dadali Y, et al. The role of FDG PET/CT in evaluation of mediastinal masses and neurogenic tumors of chest wall. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015
  12. 8(7):11146-11152. 12. Reynolds M, Shields TW. Benign and malignant neurogenic tumours of mediastinum in children and adults. In: Shields TW, Locicero J, Reed G, Feins RH, editors. General Thoracic Surgery
  13. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  14. Inci İ, Turgut M. Neurogenic tumors of the mediastinum in children. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999
  15. 15 (8):372-376. [Crossref] 14. Strollo DC, Rosado-de-christenson ML, Jett JR. Primary mediastinal tumors: Part II. Tumors of the middle and posterior mediastinum. Chest. 1997
  16. 112(5):1344-1357. [Crossref] 15. Pons F