Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin in an Italian Cohort of HCV Genotype 2 Elderly Cirrhotic Patients

Pages
113–120
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Overall, 147 patients (138 Child–Pugh A, mean age: 71 years) were treated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Sofosbuvir and ribavirin represented until recently the standard of care in hepatitis C virus genotype 2 cirrhotic patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In registration trials, 12-16 week durations were associated with 90% sustained virological responses, although not confirmed by real-life studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Overall, 147 patients (138 Child–Pugh A, mean age: 71 years) were treated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Sofosbuvir and ribavirin represented until recently the standard of care in hepatitis C virus genotype 2 cirrhotic patients. In registration trials, 12-16 week durations were associated with 90% sustained virological responses, although not confirmed by real-life studies. In Italy, various durations (12,16, 20, and 24 weeks) represent lawfully reimbursable healthcare practice. The aim is, therefore, to study the behavior of Italian clinicians and the possible impact of therapy durations on sustained virological responses and patient safety. Materials and Methods: Data of all consecutive genotype 2 cirrhotic patients who started sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy between January 2015 and March 2017 in 7 Italian liver clinics were collected retrospectively. Results: Overall, 147 patients (138 Child–Pugh A, mean age: 71 years) were treated. The median treatment duration was 16 weeks, but marked differences were found among the clinicians; however, the 12-week duration was not considered by the vast majority of them. Rates of intention-to-treat and per-protocol sustained virological responses were 95.9% and 97.1%, respectively, and neither showed differences between the various durations. No independent, sustained virological response predictors could be found, but the median baselines for Child–Pugh and Model For End-Stage Liver Disease scores were higher in non-responders. Anemia was not associated with treatment duration. One case of acute kidney injury attributed to the possible sofosbuvir effect was reported. Conclusion: In genotype 2 cirrhotic patients, sofosbuvir plus ribavirin was associated with real-life-sustained virological response rates of almost 96%, without a significant impact on treatment duration provided it was longer than 12 weeks.

🔖

Cite This Article

COLLETTA, C., SAINAGHI, P. P., ELENA, G., SMIRNE, C., PİRİSİ, M., CARBONE, R., SCIVETTI, P. (2022). Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin in an Italian Cohort of HCV Genotype 2 Elderly Cirrhotic Patients. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 113–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/508771

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/Infectious Diseases Society of America, HCV Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C guidance: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating adults infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2015
  2. 62(3):932-954. [CrossRef] 2. Yeon JE. Recent update of the 2017 Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL) treatment guidelines of chronic hepatitis C: comparison of guidelines from other continents, 2017 AASLD/IDSA and 2016 EASL. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018
  3. 24(3):278-293. [CrossRef] 3. Omata M, Kanda T, Wei L, et al. APASL consensus statements and recommendation on treatment of hepatitis C. Hepatol Int. 2016
  4. 10(5):702- 726. [CrossRef] 4. Lawitz E, Mangia A, Wyles D, et al. Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med. 2013
  5. 368(20):1878- 1887. [CrossRef] 5. Jacobson IM, Gordon SC, Kowdley KV, et al. Sofosbuvir for hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3 in patients without treatment options. N Engl J Med. 2013
  6. 368(20):1867-1877. [CrossRef] 6. Zeuzem S, Dusheiko GM, Salupere R, et al. Sofosbuvir and ribavirin in HCV genotypes 2 and 3. N Engl J Med. 2014
  7. 370(21):1993-2001. [CrossRef] 7. Foster GR, Pianko S, Brown A, et al. Efficacy of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin with or without peginterferon-alfa in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection and treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis and hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection. Gastroenterology. 2015
  8. 149(6):1462-1470. [CrossRef] 8. Kao JH, Chien RN, Chang TT, et al. A phase 3b study of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in Taiwanese patients with chronic genotype 2 hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Int. 2016
  9. 36(8):1101-1107. [CrossRef] 9. Omata M, Nishiguchi S, Ueno Y, et al. Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in Japanese patients with chronic genotype 2 HCV infection: an open-label, phase 3 trial. J Viral Hepat. 2014
  10. 21(11):762-768. [CrossRef] 10. Tacke F, Günther R, Buggisch P, et al. Treatment of HCV genotype 2 with sofosbuvir and ribavirin results in lower sustained virological response rates in real life than expected from clinical trials. Liver Int. 2017
  11. 37(2):205-211. [CrossRef] 11. Kim YM, Kim SB, Song IH, et al. Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for Korean patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection: a retrospective multi-institutional study. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018
  12. 24(3):311-318. [CrossRef] 12. Yoon JH, Jun CH, Seo JH, et al. Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype