Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes

Pages
72–76
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Basic parameters such as maternal age, induction time, parity, and Bishop score can be used to predict successful vaginal birth following dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert administration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting successful vaginal delivery in induction with slow-release dinoprostone at term pregnancy with premature rupture of membranes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Pregnancies between 370/7 and 416/7 gestation weeks with premature rupture of membranes in which slow-release dinoprostone was used for cervical ripening were sought for inclusion in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Basic parameters such as maternal age, induction time, parity, and Bishop score can be used to predict successful vaginal birth following dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert administration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting successful vaginal delivery in induction with slow-release dinoprostone at term pregnancy with premature rupture of membranes. Materials and Methods: Pregnancies between 370/7 and 416/7 gestation weeks with premature rupture of membranes in which slow-release dinoprostone was used for cervical ripening were sought for inclusion in the study. Pregnancies with previous uterine surgery, multiple fetal gestations, chorioamnionitis, non-cephalic presentation, fetal distress at the time of admission, HIV positivity, and estimated fetal weight >4500 on ultrasonographic evaluation were excluded. The primary outcome of measures were factors affecting the success of vaginal delivery including maternal age, gestational weeks at delivery, initial Bishop score, parity, induction time, and induction–delivery time interval. To reduce the risk of overfitting in the study, penalized maximum likelihood estimation was performed instead of traditional logistic regression in the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 1266 participants who met the study criteria were included in the study. Among the parameters evaluated for the prediction of successful vaginal delivery in cases with premature rupture of membranes, maternal age (P < .001), Bishop score (P < .001), parity (P=.01), induction time (P < .001), and induction–delivery time interval (P < .001) had an impact on success. The mean gestational week of the participants who had cesarean deliveries was lower than in those who had vaginal deliveries (P=.03); however, this was not a predictor factor of penalized maximum likelihood estimation (P=.70). Conclusion: Basic parameters such as maternal age, induction time, parity, and Bishop score can be used to predict successful vaginal birth following dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert administration.

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞLAK, S. C., OBUT, M., YILDIZ, G. A., BADEMKIRAN, M. H., ÇELİK, Ö. Y., ÖLMEZ, F. (2022). Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 72–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/508767

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, McBain RD, Crowther CA. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017
  2. 1(1):CD005302. [CrossRef] 2. Gafni A, Goeree R, Myhr TL, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: an economic evaluation. TERMPROM Study Group. Term prelabour Rupture of the membranes. CMAJ. 1997
  3. 157(11):1519-1525. 3. Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Wang EE, et al. Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and prelabor rupture of membranes at term: the role of induction of labor. TermPROM Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997
  4. 177(4):780- 785. [CrossRef] 4. Saccone G, Berghella V. Antibiotic prophylaxis for term or near-term premature rupture of membranes: metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015
  5. 212(5):627.e1-627.e9. [CrossRef] 5. Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, et al. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996
  6. 334(16):1005-1010. [CrossRef] 6. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010
  7. 10(10):CD000941. [CrossRef] 7. Crane JMG, Young DC. Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003
  8. 17(5):795-809. [CrossRef] 8. Keirse MJ. Prostaglandins in preinduction cervical ripening. Meta-analysis of worldwide clinical experience. J Reprod Med. 1993
  9. 38(1):89-100. 9. Lyrenäs S, Clason I, Ulmsten U. In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour. BJOG. 2001
  10. 108(2):169-178. [CrossRef] 10. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for induction of labour
  11. Available at: http://who.int. Accessed 31 July 2018. 11. Leduc D, Biringer A, Lee L, Dy J, Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee, Special Contributors. Induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013
  12. 35(9):840-857. [CrossRef] 12. Hou L, Zhu Y, Ma X, Li J, Zhang W. Clinical parameters for prediction of successful labor induction after application of intravaginal dinoprostone in nulliparous Chinese women. Med Sci Monit. 2012
  13. 18(8):CR518-CR522. [CrossRef] 13. Dare MR, Middleton P, Crowther CA, Flenady VJ, Varatharaju B. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour ruptu