Journals / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Combination of denosumab and biologic DMARDs in inflammatory muscle-skeletal diseases and connective tissue diseases

Pages
190–195
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future studies verifying the radiological disease inhibition could support denosumab use in RMD/CTD other than rheumatoid arthritis, when complicated by OP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Osteoporosis (OP) can complicate the course of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and connective tissue diseases (CTDs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Twenty-eight bDMARD/denosumab patients and 49 bDMARD patients were eligible.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future studies verifying the radiological disease inhibition could support denosumab use in RMD/CTD other than rheumatoid arthritis, when complicated by OP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Osteoporosis (OP) can complicate the course of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANK-L, showed beneficial effect in rheumatoid arthritis in inhibiting radiographic progression and erosive burden. We tested the efficacy, safety, and persistence on the treatment of the combination of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/denosumab versus bDMARD in patients with RMD and CTD. Methods: This is a retrospective evaluation of a single center, including patients with RMD/CTD (including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and overlap syndromes) treatment with bDMARD/denosumab, compared to age, gender, disease, bDMARD, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-matched controls. Results: Twenty-eight bDMARD/denosumab patients and 49 bDMARD patients were eligible. Despite a statistically significant difference during the first-year efficacy (due to the different baseline timepoint), there was no difference in the efficacy profile in the second year of treatment and in the safety profile (including local, systemic, and serious adverse events). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in the persistence of bDMARD treatment over 2 years of evaluation was found. The combination of bDMARD and denosumab was not an independent predictor of disease flare or bDMARD treatment withdrawal. Conclusion: The combination of bDMARD and denosumab does not alter the efficacy and the safety profile of the bDMARD in patients with RMD/CTD. Future studies verifying the radiological disease inhibition could support denosumab use in RMD/CTD other than rheumatoid arthritis, when complicated by OP.

🔖

Cite This Article

CERİNİC, M. M., BRUNİ, C., CİGOLİNİ, C., TESEİ, G., COMETİ, L., BARTOLİ, F., FİORİ, G., NACCİ, F., RANDONE, S. B., GUİDUCCİ, S. (2022). Combination of denosumab and biologic DMARDs in inflammatory muscle-skeletal diseases and connective tissue diseases. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 190–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/508495

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Dubrovsky AM, Lim MJ, Lane NE. Osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases: Anti-rheumatic drugs and the skeleton. Calcif Tissue Int. 2018
  2. 102(5): 607-18. [Crossref] 2. Adami G, Fassio A, Rossini M, et al. Osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019
  3. 20(23): 5867. 3. Ruaro B, Casabella A, Paolino S, Pizzorni C, Alessandri E, Seriolo C, et al. Correlation between bone quality and microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018
  4. 57(9): 1548–54. [Crossref] 4. Ruaro B, Casabella A, Paolino S, et al. Dickkopf- 1 (dkk-1) serum levels in systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis patients: Correlation with the trabecular bone score (TBS). Clin Rheumatol. 2018
  5. 37(11): 3057-62. [Crossref] 5. Koumakis E, Avouac J, Winzenrieth R, et al. Trabecular bone score in female patients with systemic sclerosis: Comparison with rheumatoid arthritis and influence of glucocorticoid exposure. J Rheumatol. 2015
  6. 42(2): 228-35. [Crossref] 6. Bruni C, Praino E, Allanore Y, et al. Use of biologics and other novel therapies for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017
  7. 13(5): 469-82. [Crossref] 7. Cometi L, Bruni C, Chiti N, et al. Effect of dysmetabolisms and comorbidities on the efficacy and safety of biological therapy in chronic inflammatory joint diseases. J Clin Med. 2020
  8. 9(5): 1310. 8. Mirabelli G, Cannarile F, Bruni C, Vagelli R, De Luca R, Carli L. One year in review 2015: Systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015
  9. 33(3): 414-25. 9. Ferro F, Vagelli R, Bruni C, et al. One year in review 2016: Sjogren’s syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016
  10. 34(2): 161-71. 10. Barsotti S, Bruni C, Cometi L, et al. One year in review 2017: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017
  11. 35(6): 875-84. 11. Hoes JN, Bultink IE, Lems WF. Management of osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015
  12. 16(4): 559-71. [Crossref] 12. Ruaro B, Casabella A, Molfetta L, et al. What role does trabecular bone score play in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases? Front Med. 2020 Nov 30
  13. 600697. [Crossref] 13. Lems WF, Dreinhofer KE, Bischoff-Ferrari H, et al. EULAR/EFORT recommendations for management of patients older than 50 years with a fragility fracture and prevention of subsequent fractures. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017
  14. 76(5): 802-10. [Crossref] 14. Ebina K, Hirao M, Hashimoto J, et al. Assessment of the effects of switching oral bisphosphonates to denosumab or daily teriparatide in pat