Journals / Eurasian Journal of Forest Science / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of natural resilience capacity of soil features affected by low severity ground wildfire after three years in Mediterranean forest ecosystem

Pages
145–156
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, there is no environmental sensitivity in the study area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Wildfires are one of the succession dynamics in the ecosystem, however forest ecosystems have natural resilience capacity to combat with natural disturbance regimes depend on local ecologic properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was determined that the negative effects of soil properties improved significantly after three years from the wildfire except for the PR and BD values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, there is no environmental sensitivity in the study area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ground wildfire · Soil ecology · Resilience capacity

Abstract

Wildfires are one of the succession dynamics in the ecosystem, however forest ecosystems have natural resilience capacity to combat with natural disturbance regimes depend on local ecologic properties. This study was conducted to evaluate natural resilience capacity status of the soil’s physical, chemical and hydrological features exposed to low severity ground wildfire after three years in the Bulutoglu village, Kahramanmaras. Particle size distribution, soil reaction (pH), electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter content (OM), dispersion ratio (DR), moisture content (MC), field capacity (FC), colloid/moisture equivalent (CM), particle density (PD), bulk density (BD) and porosity ratio (PR) analysis were performed on two groups of soils (burned and unburned counterpart). The environmental sensitivity index (ESI) include soil, vegetation, climate, and management quality of the study area was determined by MEDALUS methodology. According to the results, there is no environmental sensitivity in the study area. It was determined that the negative effects of soil properties improved significantly after three years from the wildfire except for the PR and BD values. There was no statistically significant difference between the analyzed two soil samples groups. It was concluded that the difference between the bulk density and porosity ratios is not only due to the effects of the fire but also with grazing pressure, especially on the unburned area. According to the results, the burned area suffered from low severity ground wildfire has substantially been naturally rehabilitated itself within three years. Environmentally sensitivity (ESI) of the study area was a play an important role in the recovery of soil features. Additionally recommended avoiding some activities that will compress the soil for increasing natural resilience capacity after a wildfire.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, F., DİNDAROĞLU, T. (2022). Investigation of natural resilience capacity of soil features affected by low severity ground wildfire after three years in Mediterranean forest ecosystem. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 145–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/508473

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ampoorter, E., Goris, R., Cornelis, W.M., Verheyen, K. (2007). Impact of Mechanized logging on compaction status of sandy forest soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 241: 162-174.
  2. Balcı, A.N. (1996).
  3. Forest Protection Course Notes, I.U. Fac. Of Forestry, Istanbul. Bilgili E. (2014). Forest Protection Course Notes http://www.ktu.edu.tr/dosyalar/15_01_02_83653.pdf
  4. Bradstock, R.A., Keith, D.A., Auld, T.D. (1995). Fire and conservation: imperatives and constraints on managing for diversity. In: Bradstock, R.A., Auld, T.D., Keith, D.A., Kingsford, R.T., Lunney, D., Sivertsen, D.P. (Eds.), Conserving Biodiversity: Threats and Solutions. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton. Cepel, N. (1988). Forest Ecology 3. Press. İ.U. Pub. No. 3518, Fac. of For. Pub. No. 399 Istanbul. Cerda, A and Doerr S.H. (2008). The effect of ash and needle cover on surface runoff and erosion in the immediate post-fire period. CATENA, Volume 74, Issue 3, 15 August 2008, Pages 256-263 Cerdà, A., Lasanta, T. (2005). Long-term erosional responses after fire in the Central Spanish Pyrenees 1. Water and sediment yield. Catena 60, 59–80.
  5. Certini, G. (2005). Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143, 1–10.
  6. Christensen, N.L. (1994). The Effects of Fire on Physical and Chemical Properties of Soils in Mediterranean-Climate Shrublands, in MORENO, J.M., OECHEL, W.C. (eds) The Role of Fire in Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems, Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 79-95.
  7. DESERTLINK. (2004). Desertification Indicators System for Mediterranean Europe,336pp DMİ. (2018).
  8. Meteorology General Director, K.Maraş Provincial Directorate of Meteorology, https://mgm.gov.tr/tahmin/il-ve-ilceler.aspx?il=Kahramanmaras, Accesses date: 21.04.2018
  9. Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A., Blake, W.H., Chafer, C.J., Humphreys, G.S., Wallbrink, P.J. (2006). Effects of differing wildfire severities on soil wettability and implications for hydrological responses. Journal of Hydrology 319, 295–311.
  10. Dunne, T., Leopold, L.B. (1978). Water in Environmental Planning. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. Eiten, G. (1992). Natural Brazilian vegetation types and their causes. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 64, 35–65.
  11. Eymen, U. E. (2007). SPSS User Guide Publication. Ferreira, A.J.D., Coelho, C.O.A., Boulet, A.K., Leighton-Boyce, G., Keizer, J.J., Ritsema, C.J. (2005). Influence of burning intensity on water repellence and hydrological processes at forest sites in Portugal. Australian Journal of Soil Research 43, 3