Journals / Eurasian Journal of Forest Science / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Effects of regenerative cutting on the height growth of Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) saplings

Pages
70–78
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results showed that regenerative cutting is promising to foster the growth ofTurkey oak saplings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey oak (Quercus cerris) is distributed at the northern, western and southern Anatolia in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context,the mature Turkey oak stands in Sipahiler Forests sub-district affiliated Sütçüler Forest District Directorate in Isparta,which did not have natural regeneration conditions, were artificially regenerated by acorn point sowing under thestand shelter.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results showed that regenerative cutting is promising to foster the growth ofTurkey oak saplings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Turkey oak (Quercus cerris) is distributed at the northern, western and southern Anatolia in Turkey. Although theseforests are managed by shelterwood systems, degraded forests are subjected to artificial regeneration. In this context,the mature Turkey oak stands in Sipahiler Forests sub-district affiliated Sütçüler Forest District Directorate in Isparta,which did not have natural regeneration conditions, were artificially regenerated by acorn point sowing under thestand shelter. Although the regeneration was successful, the seedlings did not realize sufficient growth. In this context,regenerative cuttings (1- cutting all saplings in the plots from just above the ground level, 2- Cutting saplings from 10cm height above the ground level, 3- Leaving only one individual at the each sowing plot (excluding the lateral stems)and pruning, 4-Leaving only one individual at the each sowing plot (excluding the lateral stems) without pruning and5- Control without any cutting and pruning) were applied to the saplings and the 4 years’ height growths of saplingswere measured. The treatments were realized just before the vegetation period of 2014 and first measurements weredone after the cuttings. To determine the height increment, second measurements were carried out after the vegetationperiod of 2017. As a result of these measurements, the height growth increment for each treatment was realized asfollow: 75.25 cm for the saplings cut from ground level, 61.98 cm for the saplings cut from 10 cm height from groundlevel, 33.62 cm for the saplings of thinned and pruning, 32.80 cm for the saplings of thinned without pruning and32.80 for the saplings of control. In final, the height growth of regenerative cutting saplings reached to those whichwere not subjected to cuttings. These results showed that regenerative cutting is promising to foster the growth ofTurkey oak saplings. But for a better understanding, longer observation is needed to see the growth differencesbetween the saplings subjected to regenerative cuttings and others, since the height of regenerative cutting saplings isnot higher than the others yet.Keywords: artificial regeneration, degradation, sapling, sprouting

🔖

Cite This Article

ALAN, M., KAVGACI, A., ÖRTEL, E., ÇOBANOĞLU, A. (2022). Effects of regenerative cutting on the height growth of Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) saplings. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 70–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/508439

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akman, Y. (1995) Türkiye orman vejetasyonu. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayını, Ankara.
  2. Amorini, E., Bruschini, S., Cutini A, Di Lorenzo, M.G., Fabbio, G. (1996) Treatment of Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) coppices. Structure, biomass and silvicultural options. Annali Istituto Sperimentale Selvicoltura, 27:121-129. Anon. (2006-2015) Baltalıkların koruya dönüştürülmesi eylem planı. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü. 25 p. Ankara.
  3. Büyükgebiz, T., Fakir, H., Negiz, M.G. (2008) Sütçüler (Isparta) yöresinde doğal odun dışı bitkisel orman ürünleri ve geleneksel kullanımları. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, A(1): 109-120.
  4. Çalıkoğlu, M., Kavgacı, A. (2001) Biyolojik çeşitliliğin sürekliliği ve artırılması açısından baltalıkların koruya dönüştürülmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, B51:111-121. de Rigo, D., Enescu, C. M., Houston Durrant, T., Caudullo, G. (2016) Quercus cerris in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A. (Eds.), European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg, pp. e01b479+ Del Tredici, P. (2001) Sprouting in temperate trees: A morphological and ecological review. The Botanical Review, 67: 121-140.
  5. Girardclos, O., Dufraisse, A., Dupouey, J.L., Coubray, S., Ruelle, J., Rathgeber, C.B.K. ( 2017) Improving identification of coppiced and seeded trees in past woodland management by comparing growth and wood anatomy of living sessile oaks (Quercus petraea) Olivier. Querternary International, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.quaint.2017.04.015. Jo Schweitzer, C., Janzen, G., Dey, D. (2016) Regenerating oak stands the natural way. In: Keyser, P.D.; Fearer, T.; Harper, C.A., eds. Managing oak forests in the eastern United States. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press: 75-84. Chapter 7. 10 pp.75-84.
  6. Kalıpsız, A. (1984) Orman hasılat bilgisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayını, 4060/448, 349 p., İstanbul.
  7. Kavgacı, A., Erdoğan, N., Arslan, M., Denli, Ö. (2018) Forest vegetation along gradient from two extreme conditions. Tubitak Uluslararası İkili İşbirliği Projesi Sonuç Raporu, 116 p. Leibundgut, H. (1984) Die Natürlihe waldverjüngung. Verlag Paul Haupt, 115 p. Bonn und Stutgart. Mayer, H., Aksoy, H. (1998) Türkiye ormanları. Batı Karadeniz Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayını, No 2, 291 s., Bolu. Nixon, K.C. (1993) Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Annals of Forest Science, 5