SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Forest Science / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

A comparative study of Ranked Set Sampling (RSS) and Simple Random Sampling (SRS) in agricultural studies: A case study on the walnut tree

Arzu ALTIN YAVUZ
Derya ÖZ
Pages
94–108
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study also emphasizes the advantage the RSS method requires fewer examples than the SRS method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sampling methods are used extensively in agricultural researches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Finally, estimation performances of the SRS and RSS methods were compared accordingly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study also emphasizes the advantage the RSS method requires fewer examples than the SRS method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Agriculture · sampling · simple random sampling (SRS)

Abstract

Sampling methods are used extensively in agricultural researches. In the sampling process, taking into consideration the characteristics of the target population and the use of a sampling method which can best represent the population make the estimates more sensitive and lead better estimations for the population. Several sampling methods have been developed for this purpose. In particular, Ranked Set Sampling (RSS) is a method that is used where it is difficult to measure all the units in the population, but it is easy and cheap to sort units in a small-sized population. In this study, we used the data based on the type of walnut tree leafage, Şebin, from a walnut garden established in the province of Giresun. The data was analyzed by using RSS designs and Simple Random Sampling (SRS) method to determine the mean estimators of the population. Finally, estimation performances of the SRS and RSS methods were compared accordingly. The study also emphasizes the advantage the RSS method requires fewer examples than the SRS method.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVUZ, A. A., ÖZ, D. (2022). A comparative study of Ranked Set Sampling (RSS) and Simple Random Sampling (SRS) in agricultural studies: A case study on the walnut tree. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 94–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/508437

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akça, Y. (2000), Cevizlerde Meyve Büyümesi ve Meyve Gelişiminin Saptanması Üzerinde bir Araştırma. Turk. J. Agric. For. 24 (2000), 349-354.
  2. Akıncı, N., Özdemir, Y. A., (2010a). L- Sıralı Küme Örneklemesi Kullanılarak Yığın Ortalamasının Tahmin Edilmesi. VII. İstatistik Günleri Sempozyumu, VII. İstatistik Günleri Sempozyumu, 28–30 Haziran 2010,
  3. Ankara,
  4. Turkey. Akıncı, N., Özdemir, Y. A., (2010b). A Study on The Efficiencies of Multistage Ranked Set Sampling Designs. Journal of Natural & Applied Sciences. Vol. 15 Issue 2, pp.127-134.
  5. Al-Nasser, A. D. (2007). L ranked set sampling: A generalization procedure for robust visual sampling. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 36: 33-43. Al-Odat,M.T., Al-Saleh,M.F.( 2001). A variation of ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistical Science. Vol.10,137–146.
  6. Al-Saleh, M. F., Samuh, M. H., (2009). On multistage ranked set sampling for distribution and median estimation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 52, 2066-2078.
  7. Balci, S., Akkaya, A., Ulgen, B.E. (2013). Modified maximum likelihood estimators using ranked set sampling. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 238, 171–179.
  8. Chen, W., Xie, M., Wu, M. (2013). Parametric estimation for the scale parameter for scale distributions using moving extremes ranked set sampling. Statistics and Probability Letters. 82, 2060-2066.
  9. Çıngı, H. (1994). Örnekleme Kuramı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Basımevi, p. 2, 11. Demir, B. (2018). Application of data mining and adaptive neuro-fuzzy structure to predict colour parameters of walnuts (Juglans regia L.). Turk. J. Agric. For. 42, 216-225.
  10. Deshpande, J. V. (2013). Ranked set sampling for environmental studies. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research. pp. 16. Dumanoğlu, H. (2000). Dessiccation Using saturated Salt Solutions and Improvement Germination Rate of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Somatic Embryos. Turk. J. Agric. For. 24, 491-498.
  11. Figueroa, F., Marhuenda, J., Gironés-Vilaplana, A., Villaño, D., Martínez-Cachá, A., Mulero, J., Cerdá, B., Zafrilla P. (2017). Soil and climate determine the antioxidant capacity of walnuts. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 29(7): 557-561.
  12. Gökpınar, F., Özdemir, Y. A., Esin, A. A. (2005). Comparing the efficiency of the estimators for the population mean under different designs of ranked set sampling. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 18, 3, 329-339.
  13. Kantay, R., As. Nusret, Ünsal, Ö. (2000). Ceviz (Juglans regia L.) odunu