SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Forest Science / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

A Study on the traditional usages of woody plants in Derdin village / Düzce (Turkey)

Ernaz ALTUNDAĞ ÇAKIR
Busem ERDİNÇ USTA
Pages
221–243
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the evaluation, the majority of the woody plants are used for more than one purpose.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study shows the tools made from locally used woody plants found during the ethnobotanical research of Derdin, an Abkhaz village of Düzce province established after migration from the Caucasus to Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty-three woody plant taxa belonging to 18 families were identified scientifically that is used by people of the area.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the evaluation, the majority of the woody plants are used for more than one purpose.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study shows the tools made from locally used woody plants found during the ethnobotanical research of Derdin, an Abkhaz village of Düzce province established after migration from the Caucasus to Anatolia. Local names, usages, and the frequency of use, of the woody plants were recorded. Woody plants whether naturally grown or cultivated are used to create tools that can be found in social life, farm equipment, kitchen, and architecture. Thirty-three woody plant taxa belonging to 18 families were identified scientifically that is used by people of the area. Plant taxa are grouped according to their usage areas. According to data gathered, the plant families that are sorted by the intensity of the use are Rosaceae, Pinaceae, and Fagaceae families, respectively. As a result of the evaluation, the majority of the woody plants are used for more than one purpose.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, E. A., USTA, B. E. (2022). A Study on the traditional usages of woody plants in Derdin village / Düzce (Turkey). Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 221–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/508421

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akan, H., Korkut, M. M. and Balos, M. M. (2008). Arat Dağı ve Çevresinde (Birecik, Şanlıurfa) Etnobotanik Bir Araştırma. Fırat Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 67-81.
  2. Akaydın, G., Şimşek, I., Arıtuluk, Z. C. and Yeşilada, E. (2013). An ethnobotanical survey in selected towns of the Mediterranean subregion (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Biology 37, 230-247.
  3. Aksoy, N. (2006). Elmacık Dağı (Düzce) Vejetasyonu. [Doktora Tezi] İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstütüsü, İstanbul,
  4. Türkiye. Aksoy, N., Özkan, N. G., Aslan, S. and Koçer, N. (2014). Düzce İli Bitki Biyolojik Çeşitliliği, Endemik, Nadir Bitki Taksonları ve Koruma Statüleri. Düzce'de Tarih ve Kültür, 316-375.
  5. Aksoy, N., Özkan, N. G., Aslan, S. and Koçer, N. (2016). Düzce İli Botanik Tarihi Araştırmaları. Düzce’de Tarih Kültür ve Sanat, 409-421.
  6. Aksoy, N., Özkan, N. G., Aslan, S. and Koçer, N. (2017). Düzce İli Halk Kültüründe Tıbbi ve Yemeklik Olarak Kullanılan Bitkiler. Düzce’de Tarih Kültür ve Sanat, 206-221.
  7. Aksoy, N. (2018). Elmacık Dağı (Düzce) Florası. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 25(2), 105- 150. Altundağ, E. and Öztürk, M. (2011). Ethnomedicinal studies on the plant resources of east Anatolia, Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 19, 756–777.
  8. Arı, S., Temel, M., Kargıoğlu, M. and Konuk, M. (2015). Ethnobotanical survey of plants used in Afyonkarahisar-Turkey. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 1-15.
  9. Arıtuluk, Z. C. and Ezer, N. (2012). Halk Arasında Diyabete Karşı Kullanılan Bitkiler (Türkiye)-II. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi 32(2), 179-208.
  10. Aslan, M., Akan, H. and Balos, M. M. (2019). Şanlıurfa'da Bazı Odunsu Bitkilerin Etkinliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 18(1), 117-137.
  11. Bağcı, Y. (2000). Aladağlar (Yahyalı, Kayseri) ve Cevresinin Etnobotanik Özellikleri. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 7(1), 89-94.
  12. Baj, J. (1969). Çerkesya'da Sosyal Yaşayış ve Adetler. Kafkas Kültürel Dergi Yayınları,
  13. Ankara.
  14. Başer, K. C. (1997). Current Knowledge On The Wıld Food And Non-Food Plants of Turkey. Cahiers Options Mediterraneennes, 129-159.
  15. Baytop, T. (1984). Türkiye'de Bitkiler ile Tedavi Geçmişte ve Bugün. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları,
  16. İstanbul.
  17. Cakilcioglu, U., Khatun, S., Turkoglu, I. and Hayta, S. (2011). Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants in Maden (Elazig-Turkey). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 137, 469-486.
  18. Çakır, E. A. (2017). Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants of Iğdır Province (East Anatolia, Tu