SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of Constipation Assessment Scale In Nursing Students

Konstipasyon Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinde Geçerlilik Güvenirlik Çalışması

Cemile AKTUĞ
Melike DEMİR DOĞAN
Pages
72–76
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The test-retest reliability showed almost perfect agreement, with an ICC of 0.744 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Constipation is a common symptom for many patients and constipation assessment scales used by the nurses providing care take a long time to apply.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The Constipation Assessment Scale was translated into Turkish and was administered to a sample of 140 participants after the validation of cultural adaptation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The test-retest reliability showed almost perfect agreement, with an ICC of 0.744 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Constipation is a common symptom for many patients and constipation assessment scales used by the nurses providing care take a long time to apply. Assessment of constipation is important to improve its management. Therefore, our study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of The Constipation Assessment Scale. Methods: The Constipation Assessment Scale was translated into Turkish and was administered to a sample of 140 participants after the validation of cultural adaptation. The test–retest method was used to assess the scale’s stability over time. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Results: The Constipation Assessment Scale’s structural validity was determined with confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis was used to examine dimensionality. The test-retest reliability showed almost perfect agreement, with an ICC of 0.744 (p

Özet

Amaç: Konstipasyon birçok hastada sık görülen bir semptomdur ve bakımı yapan hemşireler tarafından kullanılan mevcut konstipasyon değerlendirme ölçekleri uygulamak uzun zaman almaktadır. Konstipasyonun değerlendirilmesi, tedavisini geliştirmek için önemlidir. Bu nedenle, çalışmamızda Konstipasyon Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlik ve güvenilirliğini saptamayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: Konstipasyon Değerlendirme Ölçeği, Türkçe'ye çevrildi ve kültürel adaptasyonun doğrulanmasından sonra 140 katılımcıdan oluşan bir örneklem grubuna uygulandı. Ölçeğin zaman içindeki stabilitesini değerlendirmek için test-tekrar test yöntemi kullanılmıştır. İç tutarlık güvenilirliği Cronbach alfa katsayıları ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Konstipasyon Değerlendirme Ölçeği' nin yapısal geçerliliği doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile belirlendi ve boyutsallığı incelemek için exploratory faktör analizi kullanıldı. Test- tekrar test güvenilirliği, Konstipasyon Değerlendirme Ölçeği' nin Türkçe versiyonunun toplam puanı için ICC 0,744 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTUĞ, C., DOĞAN, M. D. (2022). Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of Constipation Assessment Scale In Nursing Students. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 72–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/508408

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Goodman M, Low J, Wilkinson S. Constipation management in palliative care: a survey of practices in the United Kingdom. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005;29(3):238–44.
  2. Riechelmann RP, Krzyzanowska MK, O’Carroll A, Zimmermann C. Symptom and medication profilesameong cancer patients attending a palliative care clinic. Support Care Cancer 2007;15(12):1407-12.
  3. Nagaviroj K, Yong WC, Fassbender K, Zhu G, Oneschuk D. Comparison of the Constipation Assessment Scale and plain abdominal radiography in the assessment of constipation in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011;42(2):222-8.
  4. Droney J, Ross J, Gretton S, Welsh K, Sato H, Riley J. Constipation in cancer patients on morphine. Support Care Cancer 2008;16(5):453–9.
  5. Bell TJ, Panchal SJ, Miaskowski C, Bolge SC, Milanova T, Williamson R. The prevalence, severity, and impact of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: results of a US and European Patient Survey (PROBE 1). Pain Med 2009;10(1):35–42.
  6. Brown E, Henderson A, McDonagh A. Exploring the causes, assessment and management of constipation in palliative care. Int J Palliat Nurs 2009;15(2):58–64. Pieszak S. Evidence-based interventions for constipation in patients with cancer. American Nurse Today 2011;6(2):1-4.
  7. Wald A, Scarpignato C, Kamm MA, Mueller-Lissner S, Helfrich I, Schuijt C, et al. The burden of constipation on quality of life: results of a multinational survey. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26(2):227–36.
  8. Johanson JF, Kralstein J. Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;25(5):599–608.
  9. Irvine EJ, Ferrazzi S, Pare P, Thompson WG, Rance L. Health related quality of life in functional GI disorders: focus on constipation and resource utilization. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97(8):1986–93.
  10. Dennison C, Prasad M, Lloyd A, Bhattacharyya SK, Dhawan R, Coyne K. The health-related quality of life and economic burden of constipation. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23(5):461–76. Izumi K. The measures to evaluate constipation: a review article. Gastroenterol Nurs 2014;37(2):137-46. Withnell B. A protocol for treating acute constipation in the community setting. Br J Community Nurs 2000;5(3):110–7.
  11. McMillan SC, Williams FA. Validity and reliability of the Constipation Assessment Scale. Cancer Nurs 1989;12(3):183–8. O’Mahony S, Coyle N, Payne R. Current management of opioid-related side effects. Oncology 2001;15(1):61–73.
  12. Molin AD, McMillan SC, Zenerino F, Rattone V, Grubich S, Guazzini A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Italia