Journals / Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship and Distinctions Between Editors and Reviewers

Pages
87–90
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article is aiming to highlight some important key features of the editorial process and define an outline of the roles of the actors in this practice

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today’s world, scientific publications play a more distinctive role than ever.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even people with no academic background, or even media, are following the medical journals and publications with a growing interest and as a source to keep up with the current knowledge and outcomes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article is aiming to highlight some important key features of the editorial process and define an outline of the roles of the actors in this practice
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In today’s world, scientific publications play a more distinctive role than ever. Even people with no academic background, or even media, are following the medical journals and publications with a growing interest and as a source to keep up with the current knowledge and outcomes. Therefore, the integrity and accountability of scientific publications, especially in medical journals, have been of utmost interest for scientific publishers. This leads to a more vigorous and objective evaluation process for the journals. The main role seems to be on the Editors’ shoulders, however a peer review by independent reviewers is the key to an objective evaluation for a trustworthy scientific publication. This article is aiming to highlight some important key features of the editorial process and define an outline of the roles of the actors in this practice

🔖

Cite This Article

Dagdeviren, H. N., Oztora, S. (2022). The Relationship and Distinctions Between Editors and Reviewers. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 87–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/508278

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine [Internet]. Instructions for authors [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from:
  2. Committee on Publication Ethics [internet]. Conflicts of interest / competing interests [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from:
  3. Gaudino M, Robinson NB, Di Franco A, Hameed I, Naik A, Demetres M, et al. Effects of experimental interventions to improve the biomedical peer-review process: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10(15):e019903. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019903 4. The European Association of Science Editors [Internet]. What is peer review? [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from:
  4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [Internet]. Responsibilities in the submission and peer- review process [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles- and-responsibilities/responsibilities-in-the-submission-and-peer-peview-process.html#three 6. World Association of Medical Editors [Internet]. WAME Professionalism Code of Conduct [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from:
  5. Sizo A, Lino A, Reis LP, Rocha Á. An overview of assessing the quality of peer review reports of scientific articles. International Journal of Information Management 2019;46:286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.002.