Journals / Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Fatigue’s Effect and Severity in Hemodialysis Patients

Pages
136–142
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In our study, patients over 65 years of age and those with chronic diseases other than Chronic Renal Failure had higher levels and greater impact and severity of fatigue

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect and severity of fatigue levels in hemodialysis patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 130 patients who applied to Hemodialysis units between 01 November-01 December 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In our study, patients over 65 years of age and those with chronic diseases other than Chronic Renal Failure had higher levels and greater impact and severity of fatigue
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect and severity of fatigue levels in hemodialysis patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 130 patients who applied to Hemodialysis units between 01 November-01 December 2019. Piper Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Impact Scale, and Fatigue Severity Scale were used as data collection tools. In statistical analysis, Student's t-test and variance analysis were used. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between the variables. Results: It is found that hemodialysis patients got the highest score on Piper Fatigue Scale from Piper Fatigue Scale - Affect (5.48±2.85) and patients felt moderately tired. Of the patients, 43.1% stated that ‘dialysis’ was the most important reason that contributes directly or causes their fatigue, and 23.1% stated that the best thing they found to reduce their fatigue was to sleep. Hemodialysis patients got the highest score on the Fatigue Impact Scale from the psychosocial (35.42±18.67) effect dimension. The mean score of the patients' Fatigue Impact Scale was 4.84±1.93. The Piper Fatigue Scale - Behavior, Piper Fatigue Scale - Affective, Piper Fatigue Scale - Sensory and Piper Fatigue Scale - Cognitive Dimension Scores, Fatigue Impact Scale - Cognitive, Fatigue Impact Scale - Physical and Fatigue Impact Scale - Psychosocial Dimension and Fatigue Impact Scale Total Scores and Fatigue Severity Scale Scores in Chronic Renal Failure patients with a chronic disease were significantly higher than in patients without chronic disease. The Fatigue Impact Scale - Cognitive, Fatigue Impact Scale - Physical, and Fatigue Impact Scale - Psychosocial dimensions, Fatigue Impact Scale total scores, and Fatigue Severity Scale scores in patients diagnosed with anemia were significantly higher than in those without anemia. Conclusion: In our study, patients over 65 years of age and those with chronic diseases other than Chronic Renal Failure had higher levels and greater impact and severity of fatigue

🔖

Cite This Article

Mistik, S., Tokgoz, B., Unalan, D., Aslaner, H. (2022). Evaluation of Fatigue’s Effect and Severity in Hemodialysis Patients. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 136–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/508268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ju A, Unruh ML, Davison SN, Dapueto J, Dew MA, Fluck R, et al. Patient- reported outcome measures for fatigue in patients on hemodialysis: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 2018
  2. 71(3):327-43. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.019 2. Evangelidis N, Tong A, Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Wheeler DC, Tugwell P, et al. Developing a set of core outcomes for trials in hemodialysis: an international Delphi survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2017
  3. 70(4):464-75. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.029 3. Jhamb M, Weisbord SD, Steel JL, Unruh M. Fatigue in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a review of definitions, measures, and contributing factors. Am J Kidney Dis 2008
  4. 52(2):353-65. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.005 4. Tong A, Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Wheeler DC, Evangelidis N, Tugwell P, et al. Establishing core outcome domains in hemodialysis: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop. Am J Kidney Dis 2017
  5. 69(1):97-107. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.022 5. Jhamb M, Pike F, Ramer S, Argyropoulos C, Steel J, Dew MA, et al. Impact of fatigue on outcomes in the hemodialysis (HEMO) study. Am J Nephrol 2011
  6. 33(6):515-23. doi: 10.1159/000328004 6. Wang SY, Zang XY, Liu JD, Gao M, Cheng M, Zhao Y. Psychometric properties of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) in Chinese patients receiving maintenance dialysis. Pain Symptom Manage 2015
  7. 49(1):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.011 7. Can G. Meme kanserli hastalarda yorgunluğun ve bakım gereksinimlerinin değerlendirilmesi (tez). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2001. 8. Armutlu K, Keser I, Korkmaz N, Akbiyik DI, Sümbüloğlu V, Güney Z, et al. Psychometric study of Turkish version of Fatigue Impact Scale in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci 2007
  8. 255(1-2):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.073 9. Armutlu K, Cetisli KN, Keser I, Sumbuloglu V, Akbiyik DI, Guney Z, et al. The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehabil Res 2007
  9. 30(1):81-5. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3280146ec4 10. Bai YL, Lai LY, Lee BO, Chang YY, Chiou CP. The impact of depression on fatigue in patients with haemodialysis:a correlational study. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2015
  10. 2014–22. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12804 11. Bonner A, Wellard S, Caltabiano M. Levels of fatigue in people with ESRD living in far North Queensland. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2008
  11. 17(1):90–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02042.