Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2017 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Calculation of the Index of Turkey's Vulnerability in Natural Disasters

Pages
102–111
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In the picture, it is seen that economic and social costs endured due to disasters are separated into two regions starting from the region of Eastern Anatolia and the north branch extends across the Black Sea region and the other south branch reaches to the Mediterranean.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the vulnerability levels of Turkey in terms of natural disasters and to guide decision makers and strategists in this field.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, disaster data obtained for 1987-2011 were used, and the disaster of type was most observed in our country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In the picture, it is seen that economic and social costs endured due to disasters are separated into two regions starting from the region of Eastern Anatolia and the north branch extends across the Black Sea region and the other south branch reaches to the Mediterranean.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the vulnerability levels of Turkey in terms of natural disasters and to guide decision makers and strategists in this field. In the study, disaster data obtained for 1987-2011 were used, and the disaster of type was most observed in our country. Materials and Methods: Data vulnerability indices against the disasters were calculated using a Data Envelopment Analysis Program (DEAP) 2.1 program with a Data envelopment analysis-based output-oriented Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index method. Results: The regions of Turkey, which have the highest vulnerability index for the disasters, were TRA2 (0.323), TRB2 (0.305), and TRB1 (0.287) regions. In addition, it was seen that in the Black Sea region, the TR82 (0.267) region was more vulnerable than the other places of the region. In this study, a picture of the whole country over a period of 25 years in terms of disasters was captured. Conclusion: In the picture, it is seen that economic and social costs endured due to disasters are separated into two regions starting from the region of Eastern Anatolia and the north branch extends across the Black Sea region and the other south branch reaches to the Mediterranean.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOSTAN, S., YAPRAK, Ü. (2022). Calculation of the Index of Turkey's Vulnerability in Natural Disasters. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 102–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/508090

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Tanyas M, Gunalay Y, Aksoy L, Kucuk B. Disaster Logistics Management: A New Model Proposal for Rize (Turkish). In: II. Rize Development Symposium Proceedings (Saime CB, Emre Y, eds) Rize: Recep Tayyip Erdogan University 2013: 4: 256-8
  2. Gokce O, Ozden S, Demir A. Spatial and Statistical Distribution of Disasters in Turkey; Disaster Information Inventory (Turkish) (Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Public Works and Settlement General Directorate of Disaster Affairs and Disaster Damage Assessment Studies Department, 2008)
  3. Yaprak U. Data Analysis for Inventory Control In Disaster Logistics (Turkish) [Master's Thesis] (Gumushane: Gumushane University Institute of Social Sciences, 2015)
  4. Pindyck RS, Wang N. The Economic and Policy Consequences of Catastrophes. National Bureau of Economic Research 2009; NBER Working Paper 15373: 1-42
  5. Borenszteın E, Cavallo E, Valenzuela P. Dept Sustainability Under Catastrophic Risk: The Case For Goverment Budget Insurance 2008; IMF Working Paper WP/08/44: 2-26
  6. Cavallo E, Galiani S, Noy I, Pantano J. Catastrophic Natural Disasters and Economic Growth. IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-183 (2010)
  7. Akar S. The Impact of Natural Disasters on Public Finance and Macroeconomy: Turkey Case (Turkish). Journal of Management and Economics Research 2013; 21: 185-206. [CrossRef] 8. Besiou M, Pedraza-Martinez A, Van WLN. The Effect of Earmarked Funding on Fleet Management for Relief and Development. SSRN ELECTRONICJOURNAL 2012; DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1991068; [cited 2015 December 10]. Available from: www.researchgate.net/publication/228265489_The_Effect_of_Earmarked_Funding_on_Fleet_Management_for_Relief_and_ Development
  8. Kadıoglu M, Ozdamar E. Principles of Disaster Loss Mitigation (Turkish) 1th ed. (Ankara: JICA Turkey Office, 2008)
  9. Kadıoglu M. Disaster Management: Expect Unexpected, Managing the Worst (Turkish) 1th ed. (İstanbul: Turkey Republic of the Union of Municipalities of Marmara, 2011)
  10. Wei YM, Fan Y, Lu C, Tsai HT. The Assessment of Vulnerability to Natural Disasters in China by Using the DEA Method. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2004; 24: 427-39. [CrossRef] 12. Anderson MB. Vulnerability to Disaster and Sustainable Development: A General Frame Work for Assessing Vulnerability. In: Disaster Prevention for Sustainable Development (Mohan M, Caroline C, eds) (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1995: 41-51); Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis L. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People' s Vulnerability