Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2018 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

For Whom the Sirens Toll: A Study on an Ethical Challenge in Prehospital Emergency Medicine

Pages
122–128
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that the number of victims was the main factor influenc-ing priorities and resource allocation in an emergency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The main responsibility of an emergency medical dispatcher (EMD) is to determine the situation and location of an emergency and allocate emergency resources to the scene.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the present study was to determine (theoretically) the triage decisions of dispatchers in equal emergency care situations and the factors influencing their thinking and decisions.Materials and Methods: A questionnaire containing two emergency scenarios was applied to 92 students who were candidate ambulance dispatchers in training.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that the number of victims was the main factor influenc-ing priorities and resource allocation in an emergency.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The main responsibility of an emergency medical dispatcher (EMD) is to determine the situation and location of an emergency and allocate emergency resources to the scene. However, in some cases, there might be more than one emergency calls at one time forcing an EMD to decide which call should be given priority. Triage, prioritization, and choosing are issues that may be influenced by the EMD’s personal values and thus raise ethical challenges. The aim of the present study was to determine (theoretically) the triage decisions of dispatchers in equal emergency care situations and the factors influencing their thinking and decisions.Materials and Methods: A questionnaire containing two emergency scenarios was applied to 92 students who were candidate ambulance dispatchers in training. The distribution of the participants’ response was analyzed and the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests of independence were performed.Results: Most of the participants chose to direct the ambulance to the orphanage. Results showed that the number of victims was the main factor influenc-ing priorities and resource allocation in an emergency. In the second survey, age of the injured person influenced the choices.Conclusion: In triage decisions, EMD students prioritize the age and the number of the victims while deciding the allocation of emergency resources. It includes many individual values that might influence the decision. The ethical conflict of principles in a triage decision is between justice and beneficence.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBAY, H., CAN, R., TÜRKAN, A. H. (2022). For Whom the Sirens Toll: A Study on an Ethical Challenge in Prehospital Emergency Medicine. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 122–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/508056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Huibers L, Smits M, Renaud V, Giesen P, Wensing M. Safety of telephone triage in out-of-hours care: a systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011; 29: 198-209. [CrossRef] Icisleri Bakanligi. 112 acil cagri merkezleri kuruluş, görev ve calisma yo-netmeligi. 2014; 1-26
  2. Smith RM, Conn AK. Prehospital care - Scoop and run or stay and play? Injury. 2009; 40: 23-6. [CrossRef] Erbay, H. Some ethical issues in prehospital emergency medicine. Turk J Emerg Med. 2014; 14: 193-8. [CrossRef] Adams JG, Arnold R, Siminoff L, Wolfson AB. Ethical conflicts in the pre-hospital setting. Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21: 1259-65. [CrossRef] Benson M, Koenig KL, Schultz CH. Disaster triage: START, then SAVE--a new method of dynamic triage for victims of a catastrophic earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996; 11: 117-24. [CrossRef] Ellensen EN, Hunskaar S, Wisborg T, Zakariassen E. Variations in contact patterns and dispatch guideline adherence between Norwegian emer-gency medical communication centres - a cross-sectional study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014; 22: 2. [CrossRef] Geiderman JM, Marco CA, Moskop JC, Adams J, Derse AR. Ethics of am-bulance diversion. Am J Emerg Med. 2014; 33: 1-6.
  3. Ersoy N, Akpınar A. Triage decisions of emergency physicians in Kocaeli and the principle of justice. Turkish J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010; 16: 203-9. Funderburke P. Exploring best practice for triage. J Emerg Nurs. 2008; 34: 180-2. [CrossRef] Sztajnkrycer MD, Madsen BE, Alejandro Baez A. Unstable Ethical Plateaus and Disaster Triage. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006; 24: 749-68. [CrossRef] Robertson-Steel I. Evolution of triage systems. Emerg Med J. 2006; 23: 154-5. [CrossRef] Repine TB, Lisagor P, Cohen DJ. The Dynamics and Ethics of Triage: Rationing Care in Hard Times. Mil Med. 2005; 170: 505-9. [CrossRef] Becker TK, Gausche-Hill M, Aswegan AL, Baker EF, Bookman KJ, Bradley RN, et al. Ethical challenges in Emergency Medical Services: controversies and recommendations. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013; 28: 488-97. [CrossRef] Larkin GL, Fowler RL. Essential ethics for EMS: cardinal virtues and core principles. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2002; 20: 887-911. [CrossRef] Iserson KV. Ethical principles--emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006; 24: 513-45. [CrossRef] James A, Terri S, Art SL, La G, Robert K. Professionalism in Emergency Medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5: 1193-9. [CrossRef] ten Have HAMJ, Jean MS, editors. The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights Background,