Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Assessment of Safety Status and Response Capacity of Selected Primary Health Care Hospitals in Bangladesh

Pages
137–141
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study will helppolicymakers decide priority-based resource allocations for the hospitals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Hospital is an integral part of society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The number of healthcare providers (physicians and nurses) in each PHH was 20.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study will helppolicymakers decide priority-based resource allocations for the hospitals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Hospital is an integral part of society. It can play vital role in saving lives during disasters. Bangladesh is a highly disaster-pronecountry in the world. It is urgent to know the safety status and response capacity of our healthcare facilities to ensure effective, necessaryhealthcare services during a disaster, safety and security of healthcare providers and patients. Our aim was to assess hospital safety statusand response capacity of selected Upazila Health Complexes [primary healthcare hospital (PHH)].Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at three PHH namely - Savar, Dhamrai and Saturia PHH. Sampling Technique: Purposivesampling technique was used. Healthcare providers and supporting staffs of the selected PHH and the PHH building were the studypopulation of this study. The number of healthcare providers (physicians and nurses) in each PHH was 20. The total number of healthcareproviders as study population was 60. The number of supporting staffs in each PHH was 73. The total number of supporting staff as studypopulation was 219. PHH itself was a study population in this study and the total number of PHHs as study population was three. Estimatedtotal number of study population was 282. Data were collected from 110 participants due to resource constraint. Of the 110 participants,28 were physicians, 26 were nurses and 50 were other staffs. Three hospitals (PHH) were also included as the study population in this study.Results: Among the three PHH, Savar and Dhamrai were classified as average resilient healthcare facilities on the impacts of the eventualdisasters and Saturia PHH was classified as vulnerable healthcare facility on the impacts of the disasters.Conclusion: Bangladesh has a large population compared to scarce healthcare resources. It is very pertinent to know the hospital safetystatus and response capacity of the healthcare facilities. Although it was a small-scale study, the results are alarming. This study will helppolicymakers decide priority-based resource allocations for the hospitals.

🔖

Cite This Article

MURSHID, M. E., ISLAM, Z., RIAZ, B. K., HAQUE, M. (2022). Assessment of Safety Status and Response Capacity of Selected Primary Health Care Hospitals in Bangladesh. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 137–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/507993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Directorate General of Health Services. 2010. Guidelines for Hospital Contingency Plan. Available at https://www.slideshare.net/ nationalguidelines/guidelines-for-hospital-contingency-plan [Accessed February 27, 2017] 2. Directorate General of Health Services. 2010. Disaster Management: Bangladesh Perspective. Available at https://www.ifrc.org/PageFiles/212320/ Forecast%20Based%20Financing/Bangladesh%20Government%20 Presentation.pdf [Accessed: February 28, 2017] 3. Applied Technology Council. 2011. Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage – A Practical Guide. 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 240, Redwood City, California 94065, USA. Available at http://www.curee. org/organization/office/docs/2011_FEMA_E-74_Nonstructural.pdf [Accessed March 8, 2018] 4. Directorate General of Health Services, 2012. Healthcare Network of Bangladesh: From Policy Planners to Domiciliary Workers. Ministry of Health and Family of Welfare, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Available at https://www. k4health.org/sites/default/files/hb2012_ch2_healthcare-network-bd.pdf [December 27, 2018] 5. World Health Organization and Pan American Health Organization. Hospital Safety Index Guide For Evaluators. Safe Hospitals Initiative. 2nd Edition.
  2. WHO Press, Switzerland. 2015. Available at https://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/ hospital_safety_index_evaluators.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed December 27, 2018] 6. Pan American Health Organization, and World Health Organization. Medium and Small Hospitals Safety Index. Hospital Safety Index. Series: Hospitals Safe from Disasters, No 4. Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Relief Coordination. Washington D.C: PAHO/WHO. 2015. Available at https://www.paho.org/disasters/index.php?option=com_ docman&view=download&category_slug=books&alias=2389-mediumand- small-hospitals-safety-index-2015&Itemid=1179&lang=en [Accessed December 27, 2018] 7. Pan American Health Organization, and World Health Organization. Guide for Evaluators. Hospital Safety Index. Series Hospitals Safe from Disasters, N° 1. Hospitals Safe from Disasters. Pan American Health Organization, Washington DC, 2008. Available at https://www.paho.org/disasters%20 %20/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&category_ slug=hospital-safety-index&alias=329-safe-hospitals-evaluators-guideenglish& Itemid=1179&lang=en [Accessed December 27, 2018] 8. Pisla M, Domente S, Chetraru L, Ostaficiuc R. Republic of Moldova Hospital Safety Assessment Report. National Center for Disaster Medicine. Chisinau, 2010. Availab