Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Vertebral Fracture Detection Differences of Axial Section Computed Tomography Images and Coronal Sagittal Reformat Images in Trauma Cases

Pages
232–235
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While there were no significant differences between axial and coronal sagittal reformat imaging techniques in thedifferentiation of cervical fractures, differences were found between the techniques for thoracic and lumbar fractures (p=0.636, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To investigate the contribution of multiplanar sections to vertebral fracture detection by examining the multislice computed tomography(CT) images of patients who were referred to our emergency department (ED) with trauma.Materials and Methods: We scanned 896 patients who were referred to our ED between 01.06.2016 and 01.06.2018 and whose multisliceCTs were taken with a vertebral fracture pre-diagnosis made by the ED physician.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The differences between axial and coronal sagittal reformatimages in the detection of vertebral fractures were compared in 78 cases that were found with a fracture in their tomographies.Results: The average age of the 78 cases was 55.93±23.23 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While there were no significant differences between axial and coronal sagittal reformat imaging techniques in thedifferentiation of cervical fractures, differences were found between the techniques for thoracic and lumbar fractures (p=0.636, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the contribution of multiplanar sections to vertebral fracture detection by examining the multislice computed tomography(CT) images of patients who were referred to our emergency department (ED) with trauma.Materials and Methods: We scanned 896 patients who were referred to our ED between 01.06.2016 and 01.06.2018 and whose multisliceCTs were taken with a vertebral fracture pre-diagnosis made by the ED physician. The differences between axial and coronal sagittal reformatimages in the detection of vertebral fractures were compared in 78 cases that were found with a fracture in their tomographies.Results: The average age of the 78 cases was 55.93±23.23 years. In total, 145 fractures were detected in the 78 cases. Twenty-four fractureswere detected in 12 cases in the cervical area, 67 were detected in 36 cases in the thoracic area, and 54 fractures were detected in 30 casesin the lumbar area. While there were no significant differences between axial and coronal sagittal reformat imaging techniques in thedifferentiation of cervical fractures, differences were found between the techniques for thoracic and lumbar fractures (p=0.636, p

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKDOĞAN, F. T., ERTEKİN, E., ÇANAKÇI, S. E., TUNÇYÜREK, Ö. (2022). Vertebral Fracture Detection Differences of Axial Section Computed Tomography Images and Coronal Sagittal Reformat Images in Trauma Cases. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 232–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/507986

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Pretorius ES, Fishman EK. Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral CT: musculoskeletal applications. Radiographics. 1999;19:1143-60
  2. Magid D, Fishman EK. Imaging of musculoskeletal trauma in three dimensions. Radiol Clin North Am. 1989;27:945-56
  3. Kuszyk BS, Ney DR, Fishman EK. The current state of the art in threedimensional oncologic imaging: an overview. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:1029-39
  4. Pretorius ES, Fishman EK. Helical (spiral) CT of the musculoskeletal system. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:949-79
  5. Pretorius ES, Scott WW Jr, Fishman EK. Acute trauma of shoulder: role of spiral CT imaging. Emerg Radiol. 1995;2:13-7
  6. Pate D, Resnick D, Andre M, Sartoris DJ, Kursunoglu S, Bielecki D, et al. Perspective: Three-dimensional imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Am J Roentgenol AJR. 1986;147:545-51
  7. Wicky S, Blaser PF, Blanc CH, Leyvraz PF, Schnyder P, Meuli RA. Comparison between standard radiography and spiral CT with 3D reconstruction in the evaluation, classification and management of tibial plateau fractures. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1227-32. 8. te Stroet MAJ, Holla M, Biert J, van Kampen A. The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures. Emerg Radiol. 2011;18:279-83
  8. Uzun Ç, Atman E, Şahin G. Evaluation of Articular trauma with helical computed tomography: contribution of three-dimensional imaging. J Ankara Univ Fac Med. 2017;70:151-60
  9. Brouwer KM, Lindenhovius AL, Dyer GS, Zurakowski D, Mudgal CS, Ring D. Diagnostic accuracy of 2- and 3-dimensional imaging and modeling of distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:772-6
  10. Bahrs C, Rolauffs B, Südkamp NP, Schmal H, Eingartner C, Dietz K, Pereira PL, Weise K, Lingenfelter E, Helwig P. Indications for computed tomography (CT-) diagnostics in proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study of plain radiography and computed tomography. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:33
  11. You JS, Chung SP, Chung HS, Park IC, Lee HS, Kim SH. The usefulness of CT for patients with carpal bone fractures in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:248-50.