Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the Correlation Between Breast Artery Calcification and Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Predicting the Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

Pages
136–141
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that mammographic calcification scoring,which is already commonly used as a screening tool and is more advantageous than tomography, can be used for the early determination ofintermediate risk groups for cardiovascular diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a scoring system used in the stratification of coronary risks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has been reported thata significant correlation exists between BAC and CAC and that the presence of BAC improves the ability of detecting women with CAC.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that mammographic calcification scoring,which is already commonly used as a screening tool and is more advantageous than tomography, can be used for the early determination ofintermediate risk groups for cardiovascular diseases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a scoring system used in the stratification of coronary risks. Breast artery calcification (BAC) is atype of medial artery calcification that can be visualized using mammography and is also known as arteriosclerosis. It has been reported thata significant correlation exists between BAC and CAC and that the presence of BAC improves the ability of detecting women with CAC. Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the relationship between mammographically-detected BAC and CAC.Materials and Methods: A total of 31 patients who presented to our hospital for diagnostic or screening mammography and who underwentCAC scoring between 2015 and 2018 were included in the study. Agatston method was used to determine the CAC score. Total BAC, whichvaries from 0 to 12, was measured based on the number and length of calcified vessels and the severity of mammographically-visualizedcalcification.Results: The mean BAC scores were found to be 0 in 1 patient, 1-3 in nine patients and 4-12 in 21 patients. The mean CAC scores were found tobe 0 in eight patients, 11-100 in 12 patients, 101-400 in eight patients and >400 in three patients. There was a statistically significant positivecorrelation between the BAC and CAC scores.Conclusion: This study revealed a positive correlation between the BAC and CAC scores. It was found that mammographic calcification scoring,which is already commonly used as a screening tool and is more advantageous than tomography, can be used for the early determination ofintermediate risk groups for cardiovascular diseases.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURDAIŞIK, I., NURİLİ, F. (2022). Evaluation of the Correlation Between Breast Artery Calcification and Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Predicting the Risk for Cardiovascular Disease. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 136–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/507983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. World Health Organization 2017, cardiovascular disease, viewed 21 January 2019
  2. TÜİK Haber Bülteni, Ankara Sayı:24572, 27 Nisan 2017 http://www.tuik.gov. tr/HbPrint.do?id=24572 (Accessed on: 25/03/2019)
  3. TÜİK Haber Bülteni, Ankara Sayı:16050, 30 Nisan 2014, http://www.tuik.gov. tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do%3Fid%3D16050 4. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Matthew J Budoff, Mark J Eisenberg, Scott M Grundy, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:378-402
  4. Nasir K, Bittencourt MS, Blaha MJ, Blank-stein R, Agatson AS, Rivera JJ, et al. Implications of Coronary Artery Calcium Testing Among Statin Candidates According to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Management Guidelines: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Ath. erosclerosis). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015;66:1657- 68
  5. Yiğit A. Mamografi Sağlık Teknolojisi ile Meme Kanseri Tarama Programının Klinik Etkililiğinin Meta Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. SBE Dergisi. 2017;28:401-30.https://sbedergi.sdu.edu.tr/assets/uploads/sites/343/ files/28-sayi-yazi22-20112017.pdf 7. Topuz, E. Meme Kanseri. Tanı-Tedavi-Takip. In: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, İstanbul, Aydıner A, İğci A, editors, 2006
  6. Aslan FE, Gürkan A. Kadınlarda Meme Kanseri Risk Düzeyi. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi. 2007;3:63-8
  7. Meme Kanseri Tarama Programı Ulusal Standartları. https://hsgm. saglik.gov.tr/tr/kanser-tarama-standartlari/listesi/meme-kanseri-taramaprogram% C4%B1-ulusal-standartlar%C4%B1.html 10. TRD Yeterlilik Kurulu, Rehber ve Standartlar Komitesi-Meme Kanseri Tarama Rehberi, 2011. https://www.turkrad.org.tr/assets/standartlar/meme-taramarehberi. pdf 11. Everhart JE, Pettitt DJ, Knowler WC, Rose FA, Bennett PH. Medial arterial calcification and its association with mortality and complications of diabetes. Diabetologia. 1988;31:16-23
  8. Shanahan CM, Cary NR, Salisbury JR, Proudfoot D, Weissberg PL, Edmonds ME. Medial localization of mineralization-regula