Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Investigation of the Patients with Angioedema who Applied to the Emergency Department

Pages
213–218
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the timely recognition and appropriate management of this clinical condition in the emergency departmentis of great importance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with angioedema admitted to the emergencydepartment.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Emergency Medicine Department of Erciyes University MedicalSchool between April 15 and November 30, 2016.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients older than 18 years presenting with angioedema were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the timely recognition and appropriate management of this clinical condition in the emergency departmentis of great importance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with angioedema admitted to the emergencydepartment.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Emergency Medicine Department of Erciyes University MedicalSchool between April 15 and November 30, 2016. Patients older than 18 years presenting with angioedema were included in the study. Thedemographic and clinical data of the patients were then analyzed.Results: This study included 100 patients with angioedema and the mean age of 41.48±14.10 years. Forty-five percent of the patients wereexperiencing their first attack. The most frequent complaints were swelling (93%) and itching and redness (54%). Edema was typically observedin the periorbital region and on the lips. Drug use (52%) was the most frequent cause of angioedema, with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs being the most common drug-related cause (23%). All the patients received antihistamine and steroid therapy. Althoughmost patients were administered adrenaline (67%), some were administered fresh frozen plasma and complement 1 inhibitor concentrate(3%). Furthermore, the dermatology department was consulted for most of the patients (89%).Conclusion: Angioedema is a medical condition that requires hospitalization in most cases and has the potential to rapidly progress into alife-threatening stage. Therefore, the timely recognition and appropriate management of this clinical condition in the emergency departmentis of great importance.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDİNÇ, Ş., ERTEKİN, A., AVŞAROĞULLARI, Ö. L. (2022). Investigation of the Patients with Angioedema who Applied to the Emergency Department. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 213–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/507971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Satkiene D, Kavoliuniene A, Petrauskiene I, Sirvyte R. Tongue angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment). Medicina (Kaunas). 2003;39:570-3
  2. Wilkerson RG. Angioedema in the emergency department: an evidencebased review. Emerg Med Pract. 2012;14:1-21
  3. Bernstein JA, Moellman J. Emerging concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with undifferentiated angioedema. Int J Emerg Med. 2012;6;5:39
  4. Jaiganesh T, Wiese M, Hollingsworth J, Hughan C, Kamara M, Wood P, et al. Acute angioedema: recognition and management in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013;20:10-7
  5. Cicardi M, Bellis P, Bertazzoni G, Cancian M, Chiesa M, Cremonesi P, et al. Guidance for diagnosis and treatment of acute angioedema in the emergency department: consensus statement by a panel of Italian experts. Intern Emerg Med. 2014;9:85-92
  6. Vázquez Nava F, Almeida Arvizu VM, Sánchez Nuncio HR, de los Angeles Villanueva Carreto M, Fogelbach Guidos GA. Prevalence and potential triggering factors of chronic urticaria and angioedema in an urban area of northeastern Mexico. Rev Alerg Mex. 2004;51:181-8
  7. Gakhal MS, Marcotte GV. Hereditary angioedema: imaging manifestations and clinical management. Emerg Radiol. 2015;22:83-90
  8. Lewis LM. Angioedema: etiology, pathophysiology, current and emerging therapies. J Emerg Med. 2013;45:789-96
  9. Sin A. Acute urticaria and angioedema. 7th National Internal Medicine Congress. 2005; 16-20 September
  10. Zingale LC, Beltrami L, Zanichelli A, Maggioni L, Pappalardo E, Cicardi B, et al. Angioedema without urticaria: a large clinical survey. CMAJ. 2006;175:1065- 70
  11. Bork K, Meng G, Staubach P, Hardt J. Hereditary angioedema: new findings concerning symptoms, affected organs, and course. Am J Med. 2006;119:267- 74
  12. Champion RH, Roberts SOB, Carpenter RG, Roger JH. Urticaria and angioedema: a review of 554 patients. Br J Dermatol. 1969;588-97
  13. Inomata N. Recent Advances in Drug-InducedAngioedema. Allergol Int. 2012;61:545-57
  14. Kaplan AP, Greaves MW. Angioedema. Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:373-88
  15. Banerji A, Clark S, Blanda M, LoVecchio F, Synder B, Camargo CA Jr. Multicenter study of patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorinduced angioedema who present to the emergency department. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100:327-32
  16. Iwamoto K, Mihara S, Ikezawa Z, Hide M. National prevalence survey of hereditary angioedema in Japan. Arer